Prev: Fighter Plane
Next: Nature in the city photo contest
From: Savageduck on 26 Jul 2010 17:18 On 2010-07-26 14:09:14 -0700, Paul Heslop <paul.heslop(a)blueyonder.co.uk> said: > ray wrote: >> >> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:45:24 -0700, RichA wrote: >> >>> Just when you thought they couldn't, imagine this nightmare of an idea: >>> >>> BBC: >>> the proposed introduction of police reservists - a pool of volunteers to >>> undertake police duties >>> >>> More uneducated, unemployed looney's to add to "special constables" who >>> are already such a pain when it comes to photography. >> >> It's been my general observation that if you take exception to the laws, >> it's better to direct your enmity at those who MAKE the laws than those >> who ENFORCE the laws. > > he's not a brit, he just uses us as something else to have a dig at. This conjures up visions of a Pythonesque invasion of Canada by a squad of "Special Constables", with the mission to track down Rich, and contain Canadian photographers so they do not threaten security at British railway stations. What would they do in Grand Fenwick? -- Regards, Savageduck
From: Chris F.A. Johnson on 26 Jul 2010 17:24 On 2010-07-26, Savageduck wrote: .... > What would they do in Grand Fenwick? Who knows? It's a Sellers market! -- Chris F.A. Johnson <http://cfajohnson.com> Author: ======================= Pro Bash Programming: Scripting the GNU/Linux Shell (2009, Apress) Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)
From: Savageduck on 26 Jul 2010 17:40 On 2010-07-26 14:24:10 -0700, Chris F.A. Johnson said: > On 2010-07-26, Savageduck wrote: > ... >> What would they do in Grand Fenwick? > > Who knows? It's a Sellers market! ;-) -- Regards, Savageduck
From: RichA on 26 Jul 2010 19:27 On Jul 26, 3:21 pm, Jen...(a)TheOutfall.net wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:45:24 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > >Just when you thought they couldn't, imagine this nightmare of an > >idea: > > >BBC: > >the proposed introduction of police reservists - a pool of volunteers > >to undertake police duties > > >More uneducated, unemployed looney's to add to "special constables" > >who are already such a pain when it comes to photography. > > On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:45:24 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > >Just when you thought they couldn't, imagine this nightmare of an > >idea: > > >BBC: > >the proposed introduction of police reservists - a pool of volunteers > >to undertake police duties > > >More uneducated, unemployed looney's to add to "special constables" > >who are already such a pain when it comes to photography. > > Ah. You appear to have misplaced delusions of adequacy. The Special > Constabularies are not new. Never said they were.
From: RichA on 26 Jul 2010 19:28
On Jul 26, 3:31 pm, ray <r...(a)zianet.com> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:45:24 -0700, RichA wrote: > > Just when you thought they couldn't, imagine this nightmare of an idea: > > > BBC: > > the proposed introduction of police reservists - a pool of volunteers to > > undertake police duties > > > More uneducated, unemployed looney's to add to "special constables" who > > are already such a pain when it comes to photography. > > It's been my general observation that if you take exception to the laws, > it's better to direct your enmity at those who MAKE the laws than those > who ENFORCE the laws. I thought the last election showed that in spades. |