Prev: Fighter Plane
Next: Nature in the city photo contest
From: RichA on 26 Jul 2010 11:45 Just when you thought they couldn't, imagine this nightmare of an idea: BBC: the proposed introduction of police reservists - a pool of volunteers to undertake police duties More uneducated, unemployed looney's to add to "special constables" who are already such a pain when it comes to photography.
From: DanP on 26 Jul 2010 13:54 On Jul 26, 4:45 pm, RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Just when you thought they couldn't, imagine this nightmare of an > idea: > > BBC: > the proposed introduction of police reservists - a pool of volunteers > to undertake police duties > > More uneducated, unemployed looney's to add to "special constables" > who are already such a pain when it comes to photography. They are out to get you Rich and they are getting stronger. DanP
From: George Kerby on 26 Jul 2010 14:13 On 7/26/10 10:45 AM, in article 35a0c6b6-4200-4267-a903-32bd1b51b4b1(a)j8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, "RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Just when you thought they couldn't, imagine this nightmare of an > idea: > > BBC: > the proposed introduction of police reservists - a pool of volunteers > to undertake police duties > > More uneducated, unemployed looney's to add to "special constables" > who are already such a pain when it comes to photography. Both of which you know nothing about.
From: jon on 26 Jul 2010 14:34 On 26/07/2010 16:45, RichA wrote: > Just when you[SNIP] Shut up.
From: Jenkem on 26 Jul 2010 15:21
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:45:24 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Just when you thought they couldn't, imagine this nightmare of an >idea: > >BBC: >the proposed introduction of police reservists - a pool of volunteers >to undertake police duties > >More uneducated, unemployed looney's to add to "special constables" >who are already such a pain when it comes to photography. On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:45:24 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Just when you thought they couldn't, imagine this nightmare of an >idea: > >BBC: >the proposed introduction of police reservists - a pool of volunteers >to undertake police duties > >More uneducated, unemployed looney's to add to "special constables" >who are already such a pain when it comes to photography. Ah. You appear to have misplaced delusions of adequacy. The Special Constabularies are not new. I'll even give you a clue: http://www.policespecials.com/about.html And, before casting aspersions on the educational adequacy of others perhaps you should do some remedial spelling work before posting further; the Chambers dictionary has not 'looney' but 'loony'. The plural of either does not require the use of a Grocer's Apostrophy. The 'y' should be replaced with 'ies' to be grammatically correct. The tenor of your observation suggests that you are aggrieved that the police have had cause to talk to you about delinquent behaviour on your part. I could be wrong on that deduction, it could just be that you're a troll or merely a piece of faecal detritus that needs to be flushed from Usenet. Into the toilet bowl with you and down around the trap into the sewers where you belong. Disgreards Jenks p.s. Have Nice Day! |