Brit police to get worse
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Fighter Plane
Next: Nature in the city photo contest
From: RichA on 26 Jul 2010 19:28 On Jul 26, 3:53 pm, Alan Dunlop-Walters <alanswo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 26/07/2010 19:13, George Kerby wrote: > > > On 7/26/10 10:45 AM, in article > > 35a0c6b6-4200-4267-a903-32bd1b51b...(a)j8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, "RichA" > > <rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> More uneducated, unemployed looney's to add to "special constables" > >> who are already such a pain when it comes to photography. > > > Both of which you know nothing about. > > Wrong. It knows all about unemployed. If it was employed it couldn't > possibly find the time to post all the shite it posts here. Er, you forgot the III after your name.
From: RichA on 26 Jul 2010 19:29 On Jul 26, 5:18 pm, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: > On 2010-07-26 14:09:14 -0700, Paul Heslop <paul.hes...(a)blueyonder.co.uk> said: > > > > > ray wrote: > > >> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:45:24 -0700, RichA wrote: > > >>> Just when you thought they couldn't, imagine this nightmare of an idea: > > >>> BBC: > >>> the proposed introduction of police reservists - a pool of volunteers to > >>> undertake police duties > > >>> More uneducated, unemployed looney's to add to "special constables" who > >>> are already such a pain when it comes to photography. > > >> It's been my general observation that if you take exception to the laws, > >> it's better to direct your enmity at those who MAKE the laws than those > >> who ENFORCE the laws. > > > he's not a brit, he just uses us as something else to have a dig at. > > This conjures up visions of a Pythonesque invasion of Canada by a squad > of "Special Constables", with the mission to track down Rich, and > contain Canadian photographers so they do not threaten security at > British railway stations. > > What would they do in Grand Fenwick? > > -- > Regards, > > Savageduck Employing amateurs as cops is beyond Pythonesque.
From: RichA on 26 Jul 2010 19:34 On Jul 26, 5:08 pm, Paul Heslop <paul.hes...(a)blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > RichA wrote: > > > Just when you thought they couldn't, imagine this nightmare of an > > idea: > > > BBC: > > the proposed introduction of police reservists - a pool of volunteers > > to undertake police duties > > > More uneducated, unemployed looney's to add to "special constables" > > who are already such a pain when it comes to photography. > > jees, that very broad minded of you mate. > > -- > Paul (we break easy) > ------------------------------------------------------- > Stop and Lookhttp://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/ You know what kind of people like to dress up in uniforms and pretend they're police, or army officers? Actors, and lunatics.
From: RichA on 26 Jul 2010 19:36 On Jul 26, 5:09 pm, Paul Heslop <paul.hes...(a)blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > ray wrote: > > > On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:45:24 -0700, RichA wrote: > > > > Just when you thought they couldn't, imagine this nightmare of an idea: > > > > BBC: > > > the proposed introduction of police reservists - a pool of volunteers to > > > undertake police duties > > > > More uneducated, unemployed looney's to add to "special constables" who > > > are already such a pain when it comes to photography. > > > It's been my general observation that if you take exception to the laws, > > it's better to direct your enmity at those who MAKE the laws than those > > who ENFORCE the laws. > > he's not a brit, he just uses us as something else to have a dig at. > > -- > Paul (we break easy) > ------------------------------------------------------- > Stop and Lookhttp://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/ Form up ranks, sheepdog. If you consider yourself to be part of a mass of dunderheads who are policing in Britain these days, then what the Hell are you doing with a camera, because they certainly (based on police behaviour) do not mesh.
From: Savageduck on 26 Jul 2010 19:51
On 2010-07-26 16:29:35 -0700, RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> said: > On Jul 26, 5:18�pm, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >> On 2010-07-26 14:09:14 -0700, Paul Heslop <paul.hes...(a)blueyonder.co.uk> > said: >> >> >> >>> ray wrote: >> >>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:45:24 -0700, RichA wrote: >> >>>>> Just when you thought they couldn't, imagine this nightmare of an ide > a: >> >>>>> BBC: >>>>> the proposed introduction of police reservists - a pool of volunteers > to >>>>> undertake police duties >> >>>>> More uneducated, unemployed looney's to add to "special constables" w > ho >>>>> are already such a pain when it comes to photography. >> >>>> It's been my general observation that if you take exception to the law > s, >>>> it's better to direct your enmity at those who MAKE the laws than thos > e >>>> who ENFORCE the laws. >> >>> he's not a brit, he just uses us as something else to have a dig at. >> >> This conjures up visions of a Pythonesque invasion of Canada by a squad >> of "Special Constables", with the mission to track down Rich, and >> contain Canadian photographers so they do not threaten security at >> British railway stations. >> >> What would they do in Grand Fenwick? >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Savageduck > > Employing amateurs as cops is beyond Pythonesque. Whooooosh! ....and here I was deluded into believing Canadians had a sense of humor. You need to come up for air from time to time. -- Regards, Savageduck |