C4 Hilariousness
in [Commodore]
|
Prev: Key-Mapper on C64?
Next: Datel SuperRom Expander..
From: Martijn van Buul on 10 May 2010 15:03 * Brandon Staggs: > The advent of right-to-carry law in states (here in the USA) began > recently, and violent crime has been *falling* as more lawful people > begin to carry weapons. Completely sidestepping the flaw in your logic (and historic background, for that matter), this begs one question: Is an arrogant loudmouth like Dragos "lawful" ? So far, the only evidence is to the contrary. There goes the last straw of your theory.. -- Martijn van Buul - pino(a)dohd.org
From: Martijn van Buul on 10 May 2010 15:09 * Dragos: > You are a real tool, posting pictures is not waiving a gun around. Um. Please tell me how I'm supposed to interpret your thinly veiled threats then. > I see that whatever hole you live in has conditioned you well..... Do you ave any point to make? If so, please make it, because so far, all you've done is insult people, and try to scare them with your weapons. I can't say your discussion"skills" impress me. If all you can come up with is more pointless banter, please go away. -- Martijn van Buul - pino(a)dohd.org
From: Dragos on 10 May 2010 15:12 > > Is an arrogant loudmouth like Dragos "lawful" ? So far, the only evidence is > to the contrary. There goes the last straw of your theory.. > > -- > Martijn van Buul - p...(a)dohd.org Really? and what empirical evidence do you have to support this claim? none? correct.... Running off at the mouth about things you clearly know nothing about. If you didn't make the initial threat, I am at a loss as to why you are so involved in this? Must be anti-us sentiments rising up.
From: Martijn van Buul on 10 May 2010 15:14 * Dragos: > Must be anti-us sentiments rising up. *headdesk* I'm not even going to respond to this. -- Martijn van Buul - pino(a)dohd.org
From: Brandon Staggs on 10 May 2010 15:35
"Martijn van Buul" wrote on Mon, 10 May 2010 19:03:11 +0000 (UTC): > * Brandon Staggs: >> The advent of right-to-carry law in states (here in the USA) began >> recently, and violent crime has been *falling* as more lawful people >> begin to carry weapons. > > Completely sidestepping the flaw in your logic (and historic background, > for that matter), this begs one question: Just to be clear, I am not claiming a causal relationship -- I am showing that private firearm ownership has no causal relationship with violent crime -- the idea that banning gun ownership decreases violent crime like murder is wholly unsupported by the facts. If anything, statistics show increased private gun ownership correlating with lower violent crime, in the United States. > Is an arrogant loudmouth like Dragos "lawful" ? So far, the only evidence is > to the contrary. There goes the last straw of your theory.. I have no idea who he is or what he does. As far as I can tell, all he's done is post some pictures of his guns. I've never seen the need to post pictures of any of my guns, but it certainly doesn't evince an unlawful attitude. Unless you possess an irrational fear of handguns, a picture of a handgun is no more threatening or worrisome than a picture of a computer. -- -Brandon http://www.brandonstaggs.com/c64.html |