From: Sam Wormley on
Magnetic wrote:
> On Nov 6, 4:35 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)mchsi.com> wrote:
>> Magnetic wrote:
>>> According to Russian online “opinion pole” at November 6, 2009, 52% of
>>> respondents had said that LHC is the dearth threat.
>>> But as we can see, CERN continues their preparations to this crime
>>> experiment. Conclusion - the science is criminal now!
>>> Is there online “opinion pole” about LHC in English?
>> So you think some country will bomb the LHC before it can get'm?
>
> To bomb the LHC now is better, than LHS destroy the Earth. CERN
> physicists do not want to listen about magnetic hole. They are
> potential killers of our planet. CERN physicists must be put into
> prison now; - otherwise they kill all of us.
>
> The rate of MH’s growth is not known exactly. Magnetic Hole can
> destroy the Earth in the period from 1000 seconds to 1000 days. If the
> second is correct, then you will wish to bomb the LHC yourself. But
> then it would not save you already. Because Magnetic Holes would
> already grow inside the Earth.
>
> I repeat: the probability of Earth explosion, caused by LHC, is about
> 50 %.

Have you presented calculation and gotten the physics correct,
or is the a gut instinct thing on your part. Show us your calculations.


From: tadchem on
On Nov 7, 2:29 am, Magnetic <magnetic.t...(a)yandex.ua> wrote:
> On Nov 6, 4:35 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)mchsi.com> wrote:
>
> > Magnetic wrote:
> > > According to Russian online “opinion pole” at November 6, 2009, 52% of
> > > respondents had said that LHC is the dearth threat.
> > > But as we can see, CERN continues their preparations to this crime
> > > experiment. Conclusion - the science is criminal now!
> > > Is there online “opinion pole” about LHC in English?
>
> >    So you think some country will bomb the LHC before it can get'm?
>
> To bomb the LHC now is better, than LHS destroy the Earth. CERN
> physicists do not want to listen about magnetic hole. They are
> potential killers of our planet. CERN physicists must be put into
> prison now; - otherwise they kill all of us.
>
> The rate of MH’s growth is not known exactly. Magnetic Hole can
> destroy the Earth in the period from 1000 seconds to 1000 days. If the
> second is correct, then you will wish to bomb the LHC yourself. But
> then it would not save you already. Because Magnetic Holes would
> already grow inside the Earth.
>
> I repeat: the probability of Earth explosion, caused by LHC, is about
> 50 %.

The history of eschatology shows that the probability of "the End" of
life, civilization, the earth, the universe, the solar system, etc. is
"practically" 0.

History tells us a society lasts anythere from a few hundred to a
couple thousand years.

Civilization (the building of cities) is about 7400 years old and
still going strong.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eridu

The fossil record tells us multicellular life is about 600 million
years old, and monocellular life is about 3.8 billion years old.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precambrian#Life_before_the_Cambrian

Cosmology tells us that the earth will remain habitanle for several
billion years, and that the sun will last 10 billion years.

Atop all this is the probability (about 50%) that you are a self-
deluded fool.

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
From: G=EMC^2 Glazier on
Sam Not very well informed these days. Is the LHC working or did it
again melt down as I predicted it would going up to full power? Bert

From: Sam Wormley on
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
> Sam Not very well informed these days. Is the LHC working or did it
> again melt down as I predicted it would going up to full power? Bert
>

LHC did not have meltdown, Herb. Some sparks up on the surface
due to bird dropping a crust of bread.... no big deal, but it
was a news story.

Herb, do you have public radio?

From: Jim Black on
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:40:03 GMT, Sam Wormley wrote:

> o There is evidence that a black hole has been created in particle
> accelerators in the past. Low mass black holes have an exceedingly
> short lifetime. t = m^3/(1.194 x 10^16 kg^3/s)

There have been no black holes created in accelerators. What you are
probably thinking of is the use of the AdS/CFT duality to make calculations
about quark-gluon plasmas using black hole physics.

--
Jim E. Black (domain in headers)
How to filter out stupid arguments in 40tude Dialog:
!markread,ignore From "Name" +"<email address>"
[X] Watch/Ignore works on subthreads