CERN, LHC. The End is soon.
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Fine Particle Physics and the Mathison-Trenite Life Energy Fluctuation Meter (LEF Meter) PART FOUR - {FPP 20090913-draft-V1.0-p4}
Next: JSH: So Crank.net really works?
From: Aleph on 19 Nov 2009 10:56 On Thursday 19 November 2009 15:14, in <efadca34-fe52-46f4-aaaa- a959722b7eb8(a)c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, Media Watcher sat down and wrote: > This is not what I'm saying and you know it. > Don't try to be funny by using twisted logic. > Being hit by a 4 square feet piece aliminium will not likely create a > 'red hole' in your body. > However, this same energy concentrated in a small bullet will most > certainly create a 'red hole' in your body. Defeated by your own analogy. Wonderful. -- Aleph This message was posted to usenet so please reply that way. Emails to this account are very likely to be ignored.
From: BradGuth on 19 Nov 2009 14:07 On Nov 19, 7:14 am, Media Watcher <b...(a)telenet.be> wrote: > On Nov 19, 3:18 pm, "Greg Neill" <gneil...(a)MOVEsympatico.ca> wrote: > > > > > So, you're saying that electricity flowing through > > your body could create a black hole just because the > > energy is being "handled" differently? > > This is not what I'm saying and you know it. > Don't try to be funny by using twisted logic. > Being hit by a 4 square feet piece aliminium will not likely create a > 'red hole' in your body. > However, this same energy concentrated in a small bullet will most > certainly create a 'red hole' in your body. Double density protons (even a great many of them) are really small, as in smaller than most any human cell. Molecular DNA is another matter. ~ BG
From: Dr Ivan D. Reid on 19 Nov 2009 14:59 On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:07:22 -0800 (PST), BradGuth <bradguth(a)gmail.com> wrote in <18577dd7-af64-4ff0-b168-0893a464d047(a)j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com>: > On Nov 19, 7:14�am, Media Watcher <b...(a)telenet.be> wrote: >> This is not what I'm saying and you know it. >> Don't try to be funny by using twisted logic. >> Being hit by a 4 square feet piece aliminium will not likely create a >> 'red hole' in your body. >> However, this same energy concentrated in a small bullet will most >> certainly create a 'red hole' in your body. > Double density protons (even a great many of them) are really small, > as in smaller than most any human cell. Molecular DNA is another > matter. Enough with the non sequiturs, m'kay? -- Ivan Reid, School of Engineering & Design, _____________ CMS Collaboration, Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".
From: nuny on 19 Nov 2009 15:10 On Nov 19, 5:20 am, Media Watcher <b...(a)telenet.be> wrote: > On Nov 19, 12:07 am, "n...(a)bid.nes" <alien8...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Nov 17, 2:11 pm, Media Watcher <b...(a)telenet.be> wrote: > > > Learn to spell "reports", you idiot. > > > Mark L. Fergerson > > I'm Dutch speaking. I don't need to hear any excuses from you. You want to be understood in English, learn to write properly in it. > I'm not an idiot. You side with "Magnetic". Yes, you are an idiot. > I bet my English spelling is a whole lot better than your Dutch. So what? I'm not writing for the benefit of those who can only read Dutch. > And here are two more quotes: > > "There is no danger that Titanic will sink. The boat is unsinkable and > nothing but inconvenience will be suffered by the passengers." > -Phillip Franklin, White Star Line Vice-President > > "I thought her unsinkable and I based my opinion on the best expert > advice." > -Phillip Franklin, White Star Line Vice President Not relevant, and you know it. If you don't know it, and can't see why they're irrelevant, it's because you're an idiot. Mark L. Fergerson
From: nuny on 19 Nov 2009 15:23
On Nov 19, 5:45 am, Media Watcher <b...(a)telenet.be> wrote: > On Nov 19, 12:07 am, "n...(a)bid.nes" <alien8...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Nov 17, 2:11 pm, Media Watcher <b...(a)telenet.be> wrote: > > > There is no relevant difference between "cosmic rays and the LHC > > collisions" in this context. Energy is energy, if the one were going > > to create strangelets so would the other. > > > Learn something, ANYTHING. > > Energy is indeed energy, but the way the energy handled is very much > different. No, it is not. > For example 120/220 Volt A/C directly earthed with a wire causes no > harm. The usual contracted form of "alternating current" requires no slash. It's just AC. When you include the slash, it's generally understood to mean "Air Conditioning". Grounding a wire carrying power certainly will cause harm to whatever is generating the power (also possibly melting the wires), unless the circuit is properly fused. > That same energy that flows through your body and meets you body's > resistance, in order to reach earth will destroy your body. Nonsense. I've taken many 120 volt and 220 volt shocks over the course of my life. Jolting, but not fatal. You should not use examples like that with someone who has not only book learning of, but also "hands-on" experience with, electricity. > Same energy but with quite a different result... You are still an idiot, but now you're a deliberately obtuse idiot. The energy in your example either does, or does not, pass through my body. I'd expect a difference in effects. In the referenced example- "cosmic rays and the LHC collisions", it goes into particle collisions in both cases. Hence in both cases the same effect should happen if "Magnetic" is right, but it happens in neither case, so he is not right. Learn some basic logic if science is too hard for you. Whatever you do, stop believing "Magnetic". Mark L. Fergerson |