From: Andrew Holme on 28 Aug 2005 11:44 The dividers and the phase detector of my experimental frequency synthesizer are implemented in a 15ns Altera MAX7000S CPLD. I've tried different multiplication factors (kN) to see how the close-in phase noise varies. At a 1 KHz offset, I get: -82 dBc/Hz for N=198 (VCO=19.8 MHz, comparison freq = 100 KHz) -95 dBc/Hz for N=39 (VCO=19.5 MHz, comparison freq = 500 KHz) Calculating the equivalent phase noise at the PFD: -82-20*log10(198) = -128 dBc/Hz -95-20*log10(39) = -127 dBc/Hz Given the 5:1 ratio of comparison frequencies, at a guess, I'd expect these to differ by 13 dB if the noise was mainly due to a fixed amount of time jitter at the PFD. I'm using a 10 MHz canned crystal oscillator, which I'm dividing down (inside the CPLD) to obtain the reference frequencies. I've read these are good for at least -130 dBc/Hz (before dividing down) so I'm a bit dissappointed with my noise levels. Maybe it got a bit too hot when I soldered it to the ground plane! I must try another.... Googling for "altera cpld jitter" doesn't turn-up much, and they don't mention jitter in the datasheet. Does anyone know what sort of performance can be expected from a CPLD in this regard? I don't know if the CPLD, or my circuit lash-up is the root cause. A full write-up of the project can be found at http://www.holmea.demon.co.uk/Frac2/Main.htm It has a fractional-N capability, but noise-levels are the same in integer-N mode with the external RAM disabled. Thanks, Andrew.
From: Ken Smith on 28 Aug 2005 12:30 In article <desmbt$i07$1$8302bc10(a)news.demon.co.uk>, Andrew Holme <andrew(a)nospam.com> wrote: [...] >Googling for "altera cpld jitter" doesn't turn-up much, and they don't >mention jitter in the datasheet. Does anyone know what sort of performance >can be expected from a CPLD in this regard? I don't know if the CPLD, or my >circuit lash-up is the root cause. If you have other signals running through the CPLD, part of the problem could be crosstalk. Power supply noise will also show up as a jitter. There seems to be a bad solder joint in the upper left corner. Check the LM78M05 for oscillations. We don't see the traces hooking up the bypasses on it. You also have to be careful when making things like flip-flop phase comparitors inside the MAX series. When I made one, I had to add some extra logic after the flip-flops so that the "both" state of the flip-flop pair was used to gate off the output. I think the CLRN timing was the problem bit once I got it working, I stopped looking for the root cause. IIRC: BothLatch = (UpFlipFlop # DownFlipFlop) & BothLatch # UpFlipFlop & DownFlipFlop; Up = UpFlipFlop & !DownFlipFlop & !BothLatch; > >A full write-up of the project can be found at >http://www.holmea.demon.co.uk/Frac2/Main.htm It has a fractional-N >capability, but noise-levels are the same in integer-N mode with the >external RAM disabled. > >Thanks, >Andrew. > > -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Hal Murray on 28 Aug 2005 15:47 >I'm using a 10 MHz canned crystal oscillator, which I'm dividing down >(inside the CPLD) to obtain the reference frequencies. I've read these are >good for at least -130 dBc/Hz (before dividing down) so I'm a bit >dissappointed with my noise levels. Maybe it got a bit too hot when I >soldered it to the ground plane! I must try another.... Can you measure the raw oscillator output? It may not be as good as you expect. Many low volume oscillators now use a PLL. They program the dividers rather than grind the crystal to get custom frequencies. I'd expect that numbers like 10 MHz would have enough volume so that they would avoid the PLL but maybe it's cheaper to have one production setup and use it for the common frequencies too. -- The suespammers.org mail server is located in California. So are all my other mailboxes. Please do not send unsolicited bulk e-mail or unsolicited commercial e-mail to my suespammers.org address or any of my other addresses. These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam.
From: Daniel Lang on 28 Aug 2005 16:07 I would suggest inserting a 100 ohm resistor between C3 and C7 and placing a 100uF capacitor in parallel with C7. The noise on the output of U4 is just as critical as the noise on the + input of U3. You may also want to add an RC filter on the output of U5 before feeding it to U6. Daniel Lang "Andrew Holme" <andrew(a)nospam.com> wrote in message news:desmbt$i07$1$8302bc10(a)news.demon.co.uk... > The dividers and the phase detector of my experimental frequency > synthesizer > are implemented in a 15ns Altera MAX7000S CPLD. I've tried different > multiplication factors (kN) to see how the close-in phase noise varies. > At > a 1 KHz offset, I get: > > -82 dBc/Hz for N=198 (VCO=19.8 MHz, comparison freq = 100 KHz) > -95 dBc/Hz for N=39 (VCO=19.5 MHz, comparison freq = 500 KHz) > > Calculating the equivalent phase noise at the PFD: > > -82-20*log10(198) = -128 dBc/Hz > -95-20*log10(39) = -127 dBc/Hz > > Given the 5:1 ratio of comparison frequencies, at a guess, I'd expect > these > to differ by 13 dB if the noise was mainly due to a fixed amount of time > jitter at the PFD. > > I'm using a 10 MHz canned crystal oscillator, which I'm dividing down > (inside the CPLD) to obtain the reference frequencies. I've read these > are > good for at least -130 dBc/Hz (before dividing down) so I'm a bit > dissappointed with my noise levels. Maybe it got a bit too hot when I > soldered it to the ground plane! I must try another.... > > Googling for "altera cpld jitter" doesn't turn-up much, and they don't > mention jitter in the datasheet. Does anyone know what sort of > performance > can be expected from a CPLD in this regard? I don't know if the CPLD, or > my > circuit lash-up is the root cause. > > A full write-up of the project can be found at > http://www.holmea.demon.co.uk/Frac2/Main.htm It has a fractional-N > capability, but noise-levels are the same in integer-N mode with the > external RAM disabled. > > Thanks, > Andrew. > >
From: Joerg on 28 Aug 2005 21:11 Hello Andrew, > I'm using a 10 MHz canned crystal oscillator, which I'm dividing down > (inside the CPLD) to obtain the reference frequencies. I've read these are > good for at least -130 dBc/Hz (before dividing down) so I'm a bit > dissappointed with my noise levels. ... Check its data sheet. If it doesn't have any noise specs on there get a better one. Or better yet, roll your own. CTS is a good source though. > http://www.holmea.demon.co.uk/Frac2/Main.htm How are the Altera GND pins connected to the plane? I can't see any connections. If that is via traces that's the first easy thing to fix. Look at your VCC. Switch the scope to AC and crank it way up. When called out to clients that is were I found the main contributors for phase noise. Video line sync, RAM banking spikes, whatever, it all ended up adding a little AM modulation to the logic output stages which in turn causes jitter. Sometimes others thought now I'd gone crazy: It often helps to take a very good comm receiver, put on tight fitting headphones and listen to your signals. Both sidebands plus wide open w/o IF filter. Often that revealed the tiny telltale "weeeee" or "rat-tat-tat". A spectrum analyzer on the pins and also on VCC can help as well. Then there is the usual, such as 0.01uF caps tightly fitted from VCC pins (all of them) to the ground plane. Also, check what else is happening in the FPGA. As Ken wrote this could cause crosstalk, especially if other outputs are heavily loaded or must drive longer traces. Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: Evolutionary VHDL code example Next: modelsim simulation problem |