From: krw on
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:36:13 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>"krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:
>>
>> My RAS is a Craftsman. The table saw is a Delta Unisaw, I bought last year. I
>> was going to buy one a few years ago but knew we were going to try to get out
>> of Vermont. I didn't see the point in moving a 600lb saw into our basement
>> and then hauling it back out in a year or two. So I waited until we moved and
>> bought another house. It's living in the garage now so I could wheel it into
>> the driveway. The door open is good enough. It'll move upstairs when I get
>> the room finished (probably another year).
>
>
> The garage is good enough for me. I'd have to build an elevator if I
>had a second floor. :(

Understood. There is access to the second floor of the house. I'll be
putting a (bought it from HF last year) hoist in any time, to get the sheet
goods up, then the tools.
From: Sylvia Else on
On 2/06/2010 9:56 AM, Don Klipstein wrote:
> In article<Xns9D8A63E218A0Czyadayadayada(a)216.196.97.130>, z wrote:
>> "Michael A. Terrell"<mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in
>> news:YcKdnVzaNLRnrJjRnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com:
>>
>>> vaughn wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Sylvia Else"<sylvia(a)not.here.invalid> wrote in message
>>>> news:86j7pjF9i7U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't believe in these alleged economies of scale. Solar panels
>>>>> already represent a large industry. The economies of scale, such as
>>>>> they are, have already been obtained.
>>>>
>>>> Not so, especially not so at the consumer level. At the consumer
>>>> level PV panels remain a nitch product, so lack of retail competition
>>>> and huge shipping costs because of a lack of any local distribution
>>>> channel presents significant barriers.
>>>>
>>>> Vaughn
>>>
>>> Harbor Freight sells several panels& systems. They do mail order
>>> and have a lot of retail stores in the US.
>>>
>>> <http://www.harborfreight.com/catalogsearch/result/index/?category=&q=s
>>> olar&limit=32>
>>
>> OUCH! the larger panels there are 6-8 dollars a watt
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Insolation.png :
>
> It appears to me that Philadelphia gets year-round-average insolation
> of 175 watts, at least 170 per square meter. Compare that to the 1 KW
> per square meter that I have some impression that solar cell arrays are
> rated at...
>
> That sounds to me like 34-47 dollars per watt in Philadelphia, if the
> panels are laid horizontally.

You're forcing a comparison of apples and oranges if you use that approach.

Figures for output are peak numbers, but anyone running the financials
knows that you have then to apply data relating to insolation, which are
location dependent.

The figure of $/peak watt is much more useful in practice.

Sylvia.

From: Michael A. Terrell on

"krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:36:13 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
> <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >"krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:
> >>
> >> My RAS is a Craftsman. The table saw is a Delta Unisaw, I bought last year. I
> >> was going to buy one a few years ago but knew we were going to try to get out
> >> of Vermont. I didn't see the point in moving a 600lb saw into our basement
> >> and then hauling it back out in a year or two. So I waited until we moved and
> >> bought another house. It's living in the garage now so I could wheel it into
> >> the driveway. The door open is good enough. It'll move upstairs when I get
> >> the room finished (probably another year).
> >
> >
> > The garage is good enough for me. I'd have to build an elevator if I
> >had a second floor. :(
>
> Understood. There is access to the second floor of the house. I'll be
> putting a (bought it from HF last year) hoist in any time, to get the sheet
> goods up, then the tools.


Better anyone else than me. I fell three times this week, just
walking through the house. Luckily, I was next to a wall all three
times and fell against it..


--
Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to
have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
From: Ahem A Rivet's Shot on
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:18:47 +1000
Sylvia Else <sylvia(a)not.here.invalid> wrote:

> Figures for output are peak numbers, but anyone running the financials
> knows that you have then to apply data relating to insolation, which are
> location dependent.
>
> The figure of $/peak watt is much more useful in practice.

It depends entirely on whether you're comparing panels or working
out payback periods.

--
Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays
C:>WIN | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see
You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/
From: Sylvia Else on
On 5/06/2010 4:46 PM, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:18:47 +1000
> Sylvia Else<sylvia(a)not.here.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Figures for output are peak numbers, but anyone running the financials
>> knows that you have then to apply data relating to insolation, which are
>> location dependent.
>>
>> The figure of $/peak watt is much more useful in practice.
>
> It depends entirely on whether you're comparing panels or working
> out payback periods.
>

I don't see why. A payback period (which doesn't exist at anything like
current unsubsidised pricing) will also depend on location.

Sylvia.