Chinese "Demolition" Proves 9-11 was an Inside Job
in [Physics]
|
Prev: FR Bending of Light = GR 1919 Eddington Experiment
Next: Solutions manual to Intermediate Accounting 13e Kieso
From: DanB on 13 Jan 2010 01:43 Peter Webb wrote: > > "DanB" <abc(a)some.net> wrote in message > news:3qd3n.652$Ft3.361(a)newsfe04.iad... >> Peter Webb wrote: >>> >>> "DanB" <abc(a)some.net> wrote in message >>> news:fYa3n.8803$TC5.388(a)newsfe24.iad... >>>> Peter Webb wrote: >>>>> >>>>> "DanB" <abc(a)some.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:07a3n.14379$Ef7.7709(a)newsfe07.iad... >>>>>> Peter Webb wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "DanB" <abc(a)some.net> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:vs93n.17869$w21.16657(a)newsfe17.iad... >>>>>>>> Peter Webb wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>> Perhaps you can outline your alternate theory of what happened on >>>>>>>>> 9/11, >>>>>>>>> which explains all this? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why do you keep asking for this? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because I want to know what happened on 9/11. The truth. I was >>>>>>> hoping >>>>>>> that a 9/11 "truther" would be able to explain the truth of what >>>>>>> actually happened on 9/11. However, they seem to want to keep this >>>>>>> secret, for reasons I don't understand. Its hard to believe in a >>>>>>> theory >>>>>>> which nobody will explain to you. >>>>>> >>>>>> That is not the way you do science. You don't 'believe' in theories. >>>>>> You take a theory and see if it can be falsified. >>>>>> >>>>>> A 'supporting' theory is not required. >>>>> >>>>> We aren't doing science... >>>> >>>> Do you have a mouse in your pocket? >>> >>> Simple question. Do you or don't you have a more plausible explanation >>> for the events of 9/11 than the official explanation? >>> >>> >> Why do you keep asking this? Not that I didn't see your first answer, >> 'Because I want to know.' >> >> So, why beg me, or anyone else on usenet, when there are a whole pile >> of claims on the web? Why would any one person's answer be the >> definitive? Especially on usenet. >> >> Do you have an agenda that you have yet to revel? >> >> Either you are very new to this, or, you have an agenda. Which is it? >> >> That you suspect everyone wants to keep a secret from you, it may be >> that you are somewhat schizo. >> >> You need to think about your demand... > > I don't know its a "demand". And I only asked for his own personal > theory, doesn't seem an unreasonable question. I mean, if he has a > better explanation, wouldn't he want to share it with us anyway? > > 9/11 was clearly an extremely significant event, and it is important we > all know exactly what happened. > > I am aware of people called "truthers", who feel there is a different > explanation of the events of 9/11 than the one offered by the US > Government. > > These "truthers" appear to have done a great deal of time researching > exactly this questions. They also seem very generous in giving their > time to help spread the truth. I expected that when I asked them the > "truth" of what happened, they would be happy to help. Unfortunately, no > such luck so far. > > If I do find a "truther" who is prepared to tell me what they think the > true events of 9/11 were, I will post their version of the truth here. Yep, you seem to have an agenda, or have a mental problem. You didn't read/respond to a word of what I wrote. You simply went on a rant about 'truthers',(who ever they are.), (your interpretation, by the way.) You can believe in what the mouse in your pocket says, or get a grip. But I have no hope.... Agenda seems to be your operative, just like the rest of those kooks...
From: knews4u2chew on 13 Jan 2010 12:42 On Jan 13, 3:38 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > Innews:4Z53n.6328$nR4.2834(a)newsfe01.iad, > DanB <a...(a)some.net> mused: > > > AllYou! wrote: > >> Innews:Yp53n.17765$w21.4410(a)newsfe17.iad, > >> DanB<a...(a)some.net> mused: > >>> AllYou! wrote: > >>>> Innews:_D43n.16832$DY5.4413(a)newsfe08.iad, > >>>> DanB<a...(a)some.net> mused: > >>>>> AllYou! wrote: > > >>>>>> We have: > >>>>>> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A> > > >> So, once again: > >>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A > > -- > And your obsession continues.......... And your belief that the Laws of Physics were suspended on 9-11 continues. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xevv8ITcJGk&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7kGZ3XPEm4&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epIv0IxpuCE&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDHN1gBkx0M&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlBjAZ4EFR0&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QMSAsOkumI&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_S0F4OJ3Q0&feature=related
From: AllYou! on 13 Jan 2010 13:33 In news:a582a2a5-cb30-4321-a939-b87524d20cc6(a)f5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> mused: > On Jan 13, 3:38 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: >> Innews:4Z53n.6328$nR4.2834(a)newsfe01.iad, >> DanB <a...(a)some.net> mused: >> >>> AllYou! wrote: >>>> Innews:Yp53n.17765$w21.4410(a)newsfe17.iad, >>>> DanB<a...(a)some.net> mused: >>>>> AllYou! wrote: >>>>>> Innews:_D43n.16832$DY5.4413(a)newsfe08.iad, >>>>>> DanB<a...(a)some.net> mused: >>>>>>> AllYou! wrote: >> >>>>>>>> We have: >>>>>>>> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A> >> >>>> So, once again: >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A >> >> -- >> And your obsession continues.......... > > And your belief that the Laws of Physics were suspended on 9-11 > continues. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xevv8ITcJGk&feature=related > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7kGZ3XPEm4&feature=related > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epIv0IxpuCE&feature=related > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDHN1gBkx0M&feature=related > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlBjAZ4EFR0&feature=related > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QMSAsOkumI&feature=related > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_S0F4OJ3Q0&feature=related Huhhh, no, it doesn't. http://www.911myths.com/ http://www.debunking911.com/links.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debunking_9/11_Myths http://www.answers.com/topic/debunking-9-11-myths http://www.debunk911myths.org/ http://www.slate.com/id/2088092/ http://www.amazon.com/Debunking-11-Myths-Conspiracy-Theories/dp/15881... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=fahrenheit-2777 http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2006/04/... http://www.2spare.com/item_43133.aspx http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkZMQAC95kI&mode=related&search= http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkZMQAC95kI&mode=related&search=
From: Iarnrod on 13 Jan 2010 13:46 On Jan 12, 11:43 pm, DanB <a...(a)some.net> wrote: > Peter Webb wrote: > > > "DanB" <a...(a)some.net> wrote in message > >news:3qd3n.652$Ft3.361(a)newsfe04.iad... > >> Peter Webb wrote: > > >>> "DanB" <a...(a)some.net> wrote in message > >>>news:fYa3n.8803$TC5.388(a)newsfe24.iad... > >>>> Peter Webb wrote: > > >>>>> "DanB" <a...(a)some.net> wrote in message > >>>>>news:07a3n.14379$Ef7.7709(a)newsfe07.iad... > >>>>>> Peter Webb wrote: > > >>>>>>> "DanB" <a...(a)some.net> wrote in message > >>>>>>>news:vs93n.17869$w21.16657(a)newsfe17.iad... > >>>>>>>> Peter Webb wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> Perhaps you can outline your alternate theory of what happened on > >>>>>>>>> 9/11, > >>>>>>>>> which explains all this? > > >>>>>>>> Why do you keep asking for this? > > >>>>>>> Because I want to know what happened on 9/11. The truth. I was > >>>>>>> hoping > >>>>>>> that a 9/11 "truther" would be able to explain the truth of what > >>>>>>> actually happened on 9/11. However, they seem to want to keep this > >>>>>>> secret, for reasons I don't understand. Its hard to believe in a > >>>>>>> theory > >>>>>>> which nobody will explain to you. > > >>>>>> That is not the way you do science. You don't 'believe' in theories. > >>>>>> You take a theory and see if it can be falsified. > > >>>>>> A 'supporting' theory is not required. > > >>>>> We aren't doing science... > > >>>> Do you have a mouse in your pocket? > > >>> Simple question. Do you or don't you have a more plausible explanation > >>> for the events of 9/11 than the official explanation? > > >> Why do you keep asking this? Not that I didn't see your first answer, > >> 'Because I want to know.' > > >> So, why beg me, or anyone else on usenet, when there are a whole pile > >> of claims on the web? Why would any one person's answer be the > >> definitive? Especially on usenet. > > >> Do you have an agenda that you have yet to revel? > > >> Either you are very new to this, or, you have an agenda. Which is it? > > >> That you suspect everyone wants to keep a secret from you, it may be > >> that you are somewhat schizo. > > >> You need to think about your demand... > > > I don't know its a "demand". And I only asked for his own personal > > theory, doesn't seem an unreasonable question. I mean, if he has a > > better explanation, wouldn't he want to share it with us anyway? > > > 9/11 was clearly an extremely significant event, and it is important we > > all know exactly what happened. > > > I am aware of people called "truthers", who feel there is a different > > explanation of the events of 9/11 than the one offered by the US > > Government. > > > These "truthers" appear to have done a great deal of time researching > > exactly this questions. They also seem very generous in giving their > > time to help spread the truth. I expected that when I asked them the > > "truth" of what happened, they would be happy to help. Unfortunately, no > > such luck so far. > > > If I do find a "truther" who is prepared to tell me what they think the > > true events of 9/11 were, I will post their version of the truth here. > > Yep, you seem to have an agenda, or have a mental problem. You didn't > read/respond to a word of what I wrote. You simply went on a rant about > 'truthers',(who ever they are.), (your interpretation, by the way.) > > You can believe in what the mouse in your pocket says, or get a grip. > But I have no hope.... > > Agenda seems to be your operative, just like the rest of those kooks... Get off drugs and re-read what he said, kook.
From: DanB on 13 Jan 2010 14:07
Iarnrod wrote: > <http://www.nomoretyranny.org/gallery/gallery3-4.jpg> |