Chinese "Demolition" Proves 9-11 was an Inside Job
in [Physics]
|
Prev: FR Bending of Light = GR 1919 Eddington Experiment
Next: Solutions manual to Intermediate Accounting 13e Kieso
From: Peter Webb on 12 Jan 2010 23:03 "DanB" <abc(a)some.net> wrote in message news:fYa3n.8803$TC5.388(a)newsfe24.iad... > Peter Webb wrote: >> >> "DanB" <abc(a)some.net> wrote in message >> news:07a3n.14379$Ef7.7709(a)newsfe07.iad... >>> Peter Webb wrote: >>>> >>>> "DanB" <abc(a)some.net> wrote in message >>>> news:vs93n.17869$w21.16657(a)newsfe17.iad... >>>>> Peter Webb wrote: > >>>>>> Perhaps you can outline your alternate theory of what happened on >>>>>> 9/11, >>>>>> which explains all this? >>>>> >>>>> Why do you keep asking for this? >>>> >>>> Because I want to know what happened on 9/11. The truth. I was hoping >>>> that a 9/11 "truther" would be able to explain the truth of what >>>> actually happened on 9/11. However, they seem to want to keep this >>>> secret, for reasons I don't understand. Its hard to believe in a theory >>>> which nobody will explain to you. >>> >>> That is not the way you do science. You don't 'believe' in theories. >>> You take a theory and see if it can be falsified. >>> >>> A 'supporting' theory is not required. >> >> We aren't doing science... > > Do you have a mouse in your pocket? Simple question. Do you or don't you have a more plausible explanation for the events of 9/11 than the official explanation?
From: Peter Webb on 12 Jan 2010 23:58 Why are you trying to hide the truth of what happened on 9/11 ? I want to know the truth of what happened on 9/11. Why won't you tell me?
From: DanB on 13 Jan 2010 01:06 Peter Webb wrote: > > "DanB" <abc(a)some.net> wrote in message > news:fYa3n.8803$TC5.388(a)newsfe24.iad... >> Peter Webb wrote: >>> >>> "DanB" <abc(a)some.net> wrote in message >>> news:07a3n.14379$Ef7.7709(a)newsfe07.iad... >>>> Peter Webb wrote: >>>>> >>>>> "DanB" <abc(a)some.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:vs93n.17869$w21.16657(a)newsfe17.iad... >>>>>> Peter Webb wrote: >> >>>>>>> Perhaps you can outline your alternate theory of what happened on >>>>>>> 9/11, >>>>>>> which explains all this? >>>>>> >>>>>> Why do you keep asking for this? >>>>> >>>>> Because I want to know what happened on 9/11. The truth. I was hoping >>>>> that a 9/11 "truther" would be able to explain the truth of what >>>>> actually happened on 9/11. However, they seem to want to keep this >>>>> secret, for reasons I don't understand. Its hard to believe in a >>>>> theory >>>>> which nobody will explain to you. >>>> >>>> That is not the way you do science. You don't 'believe' in theories. >>>> You take a theory and see if it can be falsified. >>>> >>>> A 'supporting' theory is not required. >>> >>> We aren't doing science... >> >> Do you have a mouse in your pocket? > > Simple question. Do you or don't you have a more plausible explanation > for the events of 9/11 than the official explanation? > > Why do you keep asking this? Not that I didn't see your first answer, 'Because I want to know.' So, why beg me, or anyone else on usenet, when there are a whole pile of claims on the web? Why would any one person's answer be the definitive? Especially on usenet. Do you have an agenda that you have yet to revel? Either you are very new to this, or, you have an agenda. Which is it? That you suspect everyone wants to keep a secret from you, it may be that you are somewhat schizo. You need to think about your demand...
From: Iarnrod on 13 Jan 2010 01:07 On Jan 12, 6:36 pm, DanB <a...(a)some.net> wrote: > Peter Webb wrote: > > Perhaps you can outline your alternate theory of what happened on 9/11, > > which explains all this? > > Why do you keep asking for this? He wants the kook to answer. Knowsknothing is of course refusing because he has nothing. Peter is highlighting the FACT that 9/11 twoofers don't really have any actual reasonable explanation for what happened aside from the proven official findings.
From: Peter Webb on 13 Jan 2010 01:20
"DanB" <abc(a)some.net> wrote in message news:3qd3n.652$Ft3.361(a)newsfe04.iad... > Peter Webb wrote: >> >> "DanB" <abc(a)some.net> wrote in message >> news:fYa3n.8803$TC5.388(a)newsfe24.iad... >>> Peter Webb wrote: >>>> >>>> "DanB" <abc(a)some.net> wrote in message >>>> news:07a3n.14379$Ef7.7709(a)newsfe07.iad... >>>>> Peter Webb wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> "DanB" <abc(a)some.net> wrote in message >>>>>> news:vs93n.17869$w21.16657(a)newsfe17.iad... >>>>>>> Peter Webb wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> Perhaps you can outline your alternate theory of what happened on >>>>>>>> 9/11, >>>>>>>> which explains all this? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why do you keep asking for this? >>>>>> >>>>>> Because I want to know what happened on 9/11. The truth. I was hoping >>>>>> that a 9/11 "truther" would be able to explain the truth of what >>>>>> actually happened on 9/11. However, they seem to want to keep this >>>>>> secret, for reasons I don't understand. Its hard to believe in a >>>>>> theory >>>>>> which nobody will explain to you. >>>>> >>>>> That is not the way you do science. You don't 'believe' in theories. >>>>> You take a theory and see if it can be falsified. >>>>> >>>>> A 'supporting' theory is not required. >>>> >>>> We aren't doing science... >>> >>> Do you have a mouse in your pocket? >> >> Simple question. Do you or don't you have a more plausible explanation >> for the events of 9/11 than the official explanation? >> >> > Why do you keep asking this? Not that I didn't see your first answer, > 'Because I want to know.' > > So, why beg me, or anyone else on usenet, when there are a whole pile of > claims on the web? Why would any one person's answer be the definitive? > Especially on usenet. > > Do you have an agenda that you have yet to revel? > > Either you are very new to this, or, you have an agenda. Which is it? > > That you suspect everyone wants to keep a secret from you, it may be that > you are somewhat schizo. > > You need to think about your demand... I don't know its a "demand". And I only asked for his own personal theory, doesn't seem an unreasonable question. I mean, if he has a better explanation, wouldn't he want to share it with us anyway? 9/11 was clearly an extremely significant event, and it is important we all know exactly what happened. I am aware of people called "truthers", who feel there is a different explanation of the events of 9/11 than the one offered by the US Government. These "truthers" appear to have done a great deal of time researching exactly this questions. They also seem very generous in giving their time to help spread the truth. I expected that when I asked them the "truth" of what happened, they would be happy to help. Unfortunately, no such luck so far. If I do find a "truther" who is prepared to tell me what they think the true events of 9/11 were, I will post their version of the truth here. |