Chinese "Demolition" Proves 9-11 was an Inside Job
in [Physics]
|
Prev: FR Bending of Light = GR 1919 Eddington Experiment
Next: Solutions manual to Intermediate Accounting 13e Kieso
From: knews4u2chew on 9 Jan 2010 15:08 On Jan 9, 5:24 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > Innews:71a5f425-4a11-4dbe-a074-84fa63909636(a)s3g2000yqs.googlegroups.com, > knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > > > > On Jan 8, 11:48 am, Robert Higgins > > <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> > > wrote: > >> I don't understand exactly what the video is supposed to > >> "prove". > > > That even given a "start" with demolition charges an old > > building does > > NOT "globally collapse" like the WTC towers and building 7 did > > without > > even more help than the failed demolition shows. > > >> This > >> is certainly a "controlled demolition", yet looks nothing like > >> 9/11. > > > The point exactly. > > You're so comletely whacked that you're actually posting proof that > the WTC buildings collapsd nothing like a controlled demonlition, > and then claiming that they did. > > LOL! You are lost as usual. You are drunk. You can't spell.
From: Iarnrod on 9 Jan 2010 19:10 On Jan 9, 1:08 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > On Jan 9, 5:24 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > > > > > Innews:71a5f425-4a11-4dbe-a074-84fa63909636(a)s3g2000yqs.googlegroups.com, > > knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > > > On Jan 8, 11:48 am, Robert Higgins > > > <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> > > > wrote: > > >> I don't understand exactly what the video is supposed to > > >> "prove". > > > > That even given a "start" with demolition charges an old > > > building does > > > NOT "globally collapse" like the WTC towers and building 7 did > > > without > > > even more help than the failed demolition shows. > > > >> This > > >> is certainly a "controlled demolition", yet looks nothing like > > >> 9/11. > > > > The point exactly. > > > You're so comletely whacked that you're actually posting proof that > > the WTC buildings collapsd nothing like a controlled demonlition, > > and then claiming that they did. > > > LOL! > > You are lost as usual. Lost? He proved you wrong, as did I. YOU are the one who is lost. Q.E.D. > You are drunk. Projection.
From: john on 9 Jan 2010 19:56 On Jan 9, 6:10 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jan 9, 1:08 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > > > > > > > On Jan 9, 5:24 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > > > > Innews:71a5f425-4a11-4dbe-a074-84fa63909636(a)s3g2000yqs.googlegroups.com, > > > knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > > > > On Jan 8, 11:48 am, Robert Higgins > > > > <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > >> I don't understand exactly what the video is supposed to > > > >> "prove". > > > > > That even given a "start" with demolition charges an old > > > > building does > > > > NOT "globally collapse" like the WTC towers and building 7 did > > > > without > > > > even more help than the failed demolition shows. > > > > >> This > > > >> is certainly a "controlled demolition", yet looks nothing like > > > >> 9/11. > > > > > The point exactly. > > > > You're so comletely whacked that you're actually posting proof that > > > the WTC buildings collapsd nothing like a controlled demonlition, > > > and then claiming that they did. > > > > LOL! > > > You are lost as usual. > > Lost? He proved you wrong, as did I. YOU are the one who is lost. > Q.E.D. > > > You are drunk. > > Projection.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9056
From: knews4u2chew on 9 Jan 2010 21:30 On Jan 9, 4:56 pm, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote: > On Jan 9, 6:10 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 9, 1:08 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > > > > On Jan 9, 5:24 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > > > > > Innews:71a5f425-4a11-4dbe-a074-84fa63909636(a)s3g2000yqs.googlegroups..com, > > > > knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > > > > > On Jan 8, 11:48 am, Robert Higgins > > > > > <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> I don't understand exactly what the video is supposed to > > > > >> "prove". > > > > > > That even given a "start" with demolition charges an old > > > > > building does > > > > > NOT "globally collapse" like the WTC towers and building 7 did > > > > > without > > > > > even more help than the failed demolition shows. > > > > > >> This > > > > >> is certainly a "controlled demolition", yet looks nothing like > > > > >> 9/11. > > > > > > The point exactly. > > > > > You're so comletely whacked that you're actually posting proof that > > > > the WTC buildings collapsd nothing like a controlled demonlition, > > > > and then claiming that they did. > > > > > LOL! > > > > You are lost as usual. > > > Lost? He proved you wrong, as did I. YOU are the one who is lost. > > Q.E.D. > > > > You are drunk. > > > Projection.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9056 Stop bothering them with facts. They claim they have all the facts by decree. Do you want to be called every name in the book for denying that the government's conspiracy "theory" is false?
From: Iarnrod on 9 Jan 2010 22:52
On Jan 9, 5:56 pm, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote: > On Jan 9, 6:10 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 9, 1:08 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > > > > On Jan 9, 5:24 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > > > > > Innews:71a5f425-4a11-4dbe-a074-84fa63909636(a)s3g2000yqs.googlegroups..com, > > > > knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > > > > > On Jan 8, 11:48 am, Robert Higgins > > > > > <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> I don't understand exactly what the video is supposed to > > > > >> "prove". > > > > > > That even given a "start" with demolition charges an old > > > > > building does > > > > > NOT "globally collapse" like the WTC towers and building 7 did > > > > > without > > > > > even more help than the failed demolition shows. > > > > > >> This > > > > >> is certainly a "controlled demolition", yet looks nothing like > > > > >> 9/11. > > > > > > The point exactly. > > > > > You're so comletely whacked that you're actually posting proof that > > > > the WTC buildings collapsd nothing like a controlled demonlition, > > > > and then claiming that they did. > > > > > LOL! > > > > You are lost as usual. > > > Lost? He proved you wrong, as did I. YOU are the one who is lost. > > Q.E.D. > > > > You are drunk. > > > Projection.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9056 BWHAHAHAAAAAA!!!! Hint: You're a kook. |