Collapse vs Demolition
in [Physics]
|
From: Road Glidin' Don on 18 Jun 2010 14:34 On Jun 18, 10:08 am, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > >Ray Fischer wrote: > > >> There is nothing there except the opinions of uneducated fools. > > > Yet, when challenged to cite any evidence to support your > >emotional, faith based and fact free kook rants, or cite even > > The cultist insists that his religious MUST BE TRUE because he says so. Continue this unending debate with rec.motorcycles removed from the newsgroups list.
From: Ray Fischer on 19 Jun 2010 02:15 Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >Ray Fischer wrote: >> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>> Ray Fischer wrote: > >>>> There is nothing there except the opinions of uneducated fools. > >>> Yet, when challenged to cite any evidence to support your >>> emotional, faith based and fact free kook rants, or cite even >>> *one* error, you come even further undone and even more stupid, >>> and thus prove my point - which of course, is that mindless, >>> blind faith followers of the government's 9-11 cartoon fairy >>> tale lack the intellect, self respect, and integrity to defend >>> their kook rants or address the facts, evidence and expert >>> research. > >> The cultist insists that his religious MUST BE TRUE because he says so. > > Which of course, is why you can't address any of the facts, Given that you're an obvious liar I really have no interest in your cult insanity. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: * US on 29 Jun 2010 22:10 http://www.vt911.org/finalcollapse%20analysis.htm
From: Michael Moroney on 30 Jun 2010 14:40 Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> writes: >>(Michael Moroney) wrote: >>> Once again, "Henry" is forging part of Ray Fischer's post > The quote is Ray's and it's 100% accurate. Nothing was forged. Sorry, "Henry". You were caught red-handed. Anyone can look at your post Message-ID: <i0afn6$jq0$2(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu> and see that the post you are responding to is Message-ID: <4c1c6094$0$1631$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>, Ray's post. But if you look at Ray's post, what he responds to isn't the same as what your post has him responding to. You added stuff Ray cut as irrelevant to his reply. This changes the meaning of his response. That's dishonest at best. But dishonesty is what I've come to expect from you 9/11 kooktards. Also, don't you think people will find it rather odd that you reply to Ray's 27 line post by adding 7 lines of your own, and somehow come up with a 149 line reply?
From: Vito on 8 Jul 2010 07:10
"Henry" <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5547481422995115331&q=zeitgeist&total=3851&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0# Watch it all Henry. |