Collapse vs Demolition
in [Physics]
|
From: Henry on 8 Jul 2010 11:12 Vito wrote: > "Henry" <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote > http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5547481422995115331&q=zeitgeist&total=3851&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0# > Watch it all Henry. Dude, I bought a bunch of copies and have been handing them out to friends. Good flick, although I'm sure that all the religion claims are accurate. -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Henry on 8 Jul 2010 14:45 Vito wrote: > "Henry" <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote > http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5547481422995115331&q=zeitgeist&total=3851&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0# > Watch it all Henry. Dude, I bought a bunch of copies and have been handing them out to friends. Good flick, although I'm not sure that all the religion claims are accurate. -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: spudnik on 12 Jul 2010 15:23 I *did* focus upon WTC7, but does the numbering infer that it was the seventh bild. to be built?... I think, not. > Focus on WTC7. It accelerated at free fall with near perfect symmetry.. > the height of ignorance." --Albert Einstein. thus&so: if it's any consolation, I get the next-to-last word on it; I'd rather wear a pseudorandom pair of Imelda Marcos's shoes, then try to debate in the context of your New sciencE -- just think of all of the permutations, dood. thus&so: that is sufficiently all, to be said on Benford's God-am law; can we not necessarily use e? (not "sumorial, although I know that there is a 'real' analog of the factorial, dood?") > >> "Generalization to digits beyond the first". > For base-b, the probability of d being the n-th digit > (n > 1) is: > b^{n-1}-1 > --- 1 > > log ( 1 + ------ ) > --- b bk + d > k=b^{n-2} > > that the probability of the first > digit being d is: > 1 > log ( 1 + - ) > b d thus&so: sorry; I'm going to stop saying, thence he died, and abuzing my time with this monolog. thanks for all fish! I'm just saying, go jumpt into a pool of spacetime, or timespace, as long as it's deep! > read more »... thus&so: yeah, but are the glasses, 3d, or the clocks -- or neither or both? > ... so, I said, "Hey, Einstein, space and time are made of rubber! > "Just kidding, dood." > I am, however, not implying that he was a surfer, but > he did know the canonical surfer's value ... of pi. thus&so: it's just his bot, as far as I can tell, without researching it ... googoling would be way too much positive feedback, and that's unpositively moderate anyway, what difference between lightwaves and rocks o'light, vis-a-vu the curvature of space (as was uncovered by You now who & you know whO-oo, in the 18th and BCE centuries (or 2nd and Minus Oneth millenia ?-) also, don't forget the ... well, their are a few of them! > If colleagues know, what good? thus&so: .... time, considered to be perpendicular to all of the three spatial directions; at least, in some abstract sense. anyway, I invented the terminology; so ,there.... um, perpendicular Universes: --BP's cap™ call of brokers the group! association http://tarpley.net
From: Henry on 12 Jul 2010 15:35 spudnik wrote: > I *did* focus upon WTC7, but does the numbering infer that > it was the seventh bild. to be built?... I think, not. >> Focus on WTC7. It accelerated at free fall with near perfect symmetry. >> "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. > thus&so: > if it's any consolation, I get the next-to-last word on it; > I'd rather wear a pseudorandom pair of Imelda Marcos's shoes, > then try to debate in the context of your New sciencE -- > just think of all of the permutations, dood. > > thus&so: > that is sufficiently all, to be said on Benford's God-am law; > can we not necessarily use e? (not "sumorial, although I know that > there is a 'real' analog of the factorial, dood?") >>>> "Generalization to digits beyond the first". >> For base-b, the probability of d being the n-th digit >> (n > 1) is: >> b^{n-1}-1 >> --- 1 >> > log ( 1 + ------ ) >> --- b bk + d >> k=b^{n-2} >> >> that the probability of the first >> digit being d is: >> 1 >> log ( 1 + - ) >> b d > > thus&so: > sorry; I'm going to stop saying, thence he died, and > abuzing my time with this monolog. thanks for all fish! > I'm just saying, go jumpt into a pool of spacetime, or > timespace, as long as it's deep! >> read more �... > > thus&so: > yeah, but are the glasses, 3d, or the clocks -- or neither or both? >> ... so, I said, "Hey, Einstein, space and time are made of rubber! >> "Just kidding, dood." >> I am, however, not implying that he was a surfer, but >> he did know the canonical surfer's value ... of pi. > > thus&so: > it's just his bot, as far as I can tell, > without researching it ... googoling would be way > too much positive feedback, and that's unpositively moderate > anyway, what difference between lightwaves and rocks > o'light, vis-a-vu the curvature of space (as > was uncovered by You now who & you know whO-oo, > in the 18th and BCE centuries (or 2nd and Minus Oneth millenia ?-) > also, don't forget the ... well, their are a few of them! >> If colleagues know, what good? > > thus&so: > ... time, considered to be perpendicular to all > of the three spatial directions; at least, in some abstract sense. > anyway, I invented the terminology; so ,there.... um, > perpendicular Universes: > > --BP's cap™ call of brokers the group! association > http://tarpley.net Party on dood.... -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Ray Fischer on 13 Jul 2010 04:04
Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >spudnik wrote: > >> where I skipped-to in that video >> Rodriquez was holding forth, presumably about his interpretation, >> that "the bombs went off in the lower basement and, >> seven seconds later, the plane hit!" (no audio, here.) > >> well, that's his interpretation. anway, it behooves the Truthers, >> that "controlled demolition" is just a subset of "catastrophic >> collapse," >> and not the other way around (those planes didn't cause a trashfire, >> such as neve-before had demolished a skyscraper; >> they were huge bombs). > > Focus on WTC7. It accelerated at free fall with near perfect symmetry. >It also had melted and vaporized steel columns in the rubble. That's >impossible without demolition. Why? > Please explain how WTC7 could have dropped at the rate of free fall It didn't. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net |