Collapse vs Demolition
in [Physics]
|
From: Ray Fischer on 13 Jul 2010 14:08 Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >Ray Fischer wrote: >> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: > >>> Focus on WTC7. It accelerated at free fall with near perfect symmetry. >>> It also had melted and vaporized steel columns in the rubble. That's > >> Why? > > You deleted the answer when you quoted my post. Here it is again. >Let us know if you disagree with any of the facts, research, and >evidence, and if so, what and why, exactly. > > Free fall, by definition, can only be achieved if a falling structure >or object encounters no significant resistance. "no SIGNIFICANT" resistance. > Obviously, a steel >frame that's engineered to support several times its own weight "melted and vaporized steel columns" >can >not crush itself at the the rate of free fall. Why? > The belief that it can, >is one of the most comically absurd claims in your impossible magic "I'm right and you must agree with me!" Yawn. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: Henry on 13 Jul 2010 14:58 Ray Fischer wrote: > Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >> Ray Fischer wrote: >>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>>> Focus on WTC7. It accelerated at free fall with near perfect symmetry. >>>> It also had melted and vaporized steel columns in the rubble. That's >>> Why? >> You deleted the answer when you quoted my post. Here it is again. >> Let us know if you disagree with any of the facts, research, and >> evidence, and if so, what and why, exactly. >> Free fall, by definition, can only be achieved if a falling structure >> or object encounters no significant resistance. > "no SIGNIFICANT" resistance. Well, technically, no resistance at all. Even air resistance will reduce the rate of acceleration to less than free fall, but the change can be so minor that it's difficult to observe. >> Obviously, a steel >> frame that's engineered to support several times its own weight > "melted and vaporized steel columns" Could not have been the result of the minor, ordinary office fires that were in WTC7, which is more proof of demolition. >> can not crush itself at the the rate of free fall. > Why? Wow... First, if an object or structure accelerates at the rate of free fall, *all* of its gravitational potential energy has been converted to motion, and no energy is available to crush, bend, and break 10s of thousands of tons of structural steel. Obviously that would *greatly* reduce or stop the acceleration. A steel structure that's capable of supporting several times the weight of the building would produce significant resistance. Free fall can only take place when there is no resistance. Look at some of the presentations on this website. The author is a physics teacher and presents the information very articulately. Let us know if you disagree with any of his research. It's been peer reviewed, and so far, no one has been able to find any errors. http://www.911speakout.org/ -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Ray Fischer on 13 Jul 2010 22:52 Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >Ray Fischer wrote: >> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>> Obviously, a steel >>> frame that's engineered to support several times its own weight > >> "melted and vaporized steel columns" > > Could not have been the result of the minor, You claim that "melted and vaporized steel columns" could support "several times [their] own weight". You can't even keep your own story straight. >>> can not crush itself at the the rate of free fall. > >> Why? > > Wow... First, if an object or structure accelerates at the rate of >free fall, I don't accept your premise. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: Henry on 14 Jul 2010 11:32 Ray Fischer wrote: > "melted and vaporized steel columns" http://911blogger.com/news/2010-07-13/911-experiments-mysterious-eutectic-steel http://wtc.nist.gov/media/AppendixC-fema403_apc.pdf -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Henry on 14 Jul 2010 11:36
Ray Fischer wrote: > Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: > You claim that "melted and vaporized steel columns" could support > "several times [their] own weight". No, I never made that claim. You need to work on your reading comprehension. >> Wow... First, if an object or structure accelerates at the rate of >> free fall, *all* of its gravitational potential energy has been >> converted to motion, and no energy is available to crush, bend, >> and break 10s of thousands of tons of structural steel. Obviously >> that would *greatly* reduce or stop the acceleration. A steel >> structure that's capable of supporting several times the weight >> of the building would produce significant resistance. Free fall can >> only take place when there is no resistance. >> Look at some of the presentations on this website. The author is a >> physics teacher and presents the information very articulately. >> Let us know if you disagree with any of his research. It's been peer >> reviewed, and so far, no one has been able to find any errors. >> http://www.911speakout.org/ > I don't accept your premise. Do you disagree with any of the research on the website? If so, can you tell us what and why, exactly? -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org |