Collapse vs Demolition
in [Physics]
|
From: * US on 17 Jul 2010 12:13 On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 09:48:26 -0600, "Bob Myers" <nospamplease(a)address.invalid> wrote: >... a single issue... It's a significant one. See "false flag".
From: Curly Surmudgeon on 17 Jul 2010 16:51 On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:19:21 +0000, rfischer(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudgeon(a)live.com> wrote: >>On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:26:03 -0700, Twibil <nowayjose6(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Jul 15, 11:48 pm, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> You're insane, aren't you? >>> >>> It took you this long to figure it out? >>> >>> Poor Henry has been a textbook case of a perfectly normal guy who >>> slipped into psychosis over an extended period of time, and he did so >>> right before everyone's eyes on Usenet. He's no longer able to >>> distinguish reality from his fanatsies, and unfortunately he gets >>> worse and worse as time goes on. So don't bother debating with him or >>> getting mad (unless you enjoy that sort of thing): it's a waste of >>> time. >>> >>> He isn't responsible for what he posts, and actually believes the >>> things he says: even when you show him what he himself said two posts >>> ago he will blandly deny that he ever said such a thing, and he will >>> believe it 100%. He will also claim that you said things you never >>> even suggested, and will continue making those claims for years >>> afterwards, even though everyone knows that he's simply inventing his >>> facts as he goes along. >>> >>> It's sad, but this sort of thing happens to people from time to time, >>> and so far as I'm aware there is no cure. >> >>From the bleachers it appears that you and Ray are the wackos. >> >>Henry sticks to the issues, you two engage in character assassination. > > In one post he claimed that the building couldn't not collapse as fast > as it did because stell columns were designed to support "several times > [their] own weight". The her referred to the "melted and vaporized > steel columns" in the wreakage. > > Those two statements are mutually incompatible. Then make that point rather than character assassination. Your behavior and responses are backfiring. -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lest we forget: Scott McInnis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Curly Surmudgeon on 17 Jul 2010 16:52 On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 09:48:26 -0600, "Bob Myers" <nospamplease(a)address.invalid> wrote: > Curly Surmudgeon wrote: >> From the bleachers it appears that you and Ray are the wackos. >> >> Henry sticks to the issues, you two engage in character assassination. > > Henry "sticks" monomaniacally to a single issue, and one in which he has > been shown to be completely wrong over and over and over again. If > that's not a textbook definition of "wacko," what is? > > Bob M. Same response as to Ray previously, make that point and stick to the issues. Character assassination backfired and you appear to the be lunatic. -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lest we forget: Scott McInnis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Curly Surmudgeon on 17 Jul 2010 16:53 On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:20:01 +0000, rfischer(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>Ray Fischer wrote: >>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>>> Ray Fischer wrote: >>>>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote: >> >>>>>>> You claim that "melted and vaporized steel columns" could support >>>>>>> "several times [their] own weight". >> >>>>>> No, I never made that claim. >> >>>>> Those are your words. >> >>>> Actually, they're your words. That's why the attributes that >>>> refer to them read, "Ray Fisher wrote". >> >>> Smirk. Looks like it says "Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote". >> >> More proof that you lack the intelligence to follow a thread - > > More proof that you're a crazy dumbass. Stand back and look at what you've just posted. If you're hoping to portray Henry as a wacko you just shot yourself in the foot. -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lest we forget: Scott McInnis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Ray Fischer on 17 Jul 2010 17:57
Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudgeon(a)live.com> wrote: > rfischer(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) >> Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudgeon(a)live.com> wrote: >>>On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:26:03 -0700, Twibil <nowayjose6(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Jul 15, 11:48 pm, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You're insane, aren't you? >>>> >>>> It took you this long to figure it out? >>>> >>>> Poor Henry has been a textbook case of a perfectly normal guy who >>>> slipped into psychosis over an extended period of time, and he did so >>>> right before everyone's eyes on Usenet. He's no longer able to >>>> distinguish reality from his fanatsies, and unfortunately he gets >>>> worse and worse as time goes on. So don't bother debating with him or >>>> getting mad (unless you enjoy that sort of thing): it's a waste of >>>> time. >>>> >>>> He isn't responsible for what he posts, and actually believes the >>>> things he says: even when you show him what he himself said two posts >>>> ago he will blandly deny that he ever said such a thing, and he will >>>> believe it 100%. He will also claim that you said things you never >>>> even suggested, and will continue making those claims for years >>>> afterwards, even though everyone knows that he's simply inventing his >>>> facts as he goes along. >>>> >>>> It's sad, but this sort of thing happens to people from time to time, >>>> and so far as I'm aware there is no cure. >>> >>>From the bleachers it appears that you and Ray are the wackos. >>> >>>Henry sticks to the issues, you two engage in character assassination. >> >> In one post he claimed that the building couldn't collapse as fast >> as it did because steel columns were designed to support "several times >> [their] own weight". The he referred to the "melted and vaporized >> steel columns" in the wreakage. >> >> Those two statements are mutually incompatible. > >Then make that point rather than character assassination. I did. The lunatic denied having written those words. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net |