From: Duddits on 24 May 2010 17:03 On Mon, 24 May 2010 21:38:50 +0200, "JP Loken" <jp_lokennospam(a)hotmailspam.com> wrote: >P� Mon, 24 May 2010 19:22:54 +0200, skrev shrink4g <shrink4g(a)yahoo.com>: > >> Having been using Smart Defrag for awhile and I am about to switch gear >> due to the upgrade to 64bit Window7. I found 2 that are supporting the >> 64bit native, but have no experience (how well they work) using them. >> Between Mydefrag and Defraggler, which would you recommend? Thanks. > >It's a lot of work to test these apps on equal terms. >However, a computer magazine did that about four months ago. >MyDefrag was considered the best free alternative. >IIRC speed and optimization was measured, maybe other factors, too. > >I've used it and its predecessor for a long time. Never experienced any >problems with it. I've found a few articles: The Great Defrag Shoot Out: http://donnedwards.openaccess.co.za/2007/06/great-defrag-shootout-all.html Maximum PC http://www.maximumpc.com/article/the_disk_defrag_difference hth Dud
From: JP Loken on 24 May 2010 17:27 På Mon, 24 May 2010 21:38:50 +0200, skrev JP Loken <jp_lokennospam(a)hotmailspam.com>: > På Mon, 24 May 2010 19:22:54 +0200, skrev shrink4g <shrink4g(a)yahoo.com>: > >> Having been using Smart Defrag for awhile and I am about to switch gear >> due to the upgrade to 64bit Window7. I found 2 that are supporting the >> 64bit native, but have no experience (how well they work) using them. >> Between Mydefrag and Defraggler, which would you recommend? Thanks. > > It's a lot of work to test these apps on equal terms. > However, a computer magazine did that about four months ago. > MyDefrag was considered the best free alternative. > IIRC speed and optimization was measured, maybe other factors, too. <snip> Some other programs have been mentioned in this thread. I remember that Auslogics Defrag and Defraggler was tested. Auslogics with the better score of these two. I cannot remember if Puran was tested. -- JP Loken Sent with Opera's e-mail program: http://www.opera.com/mail/
From: VanguardLH on 24 May 2010 17:49 shrink4g wrote: > Having been using Smart Defrag for awhile and I am about to switch gear > due to the upgrade to 64bit Window7. I found 2 that are supporting the > 64bit native, but have no experience (how well they work) using them. > Between Mydefrag and Defraggler, which would you recommend? Thanks. A side note: Be careful of how often or when you defragment if you are performing regular *image* backups of your host. Many image backup programs can save either full or incremental image backups. However, if you go moving sectors around with a defrag then it is likely a scheduled incremental image backup will result in performing instead a full image backup and you consume more of the backup media's space than you had intended. If you scheduled image backups of your host, also schedule the defrag to occur before you schedule a full image backup and not on any other day when you schedule an incremental image backup. http://kb.acronis.com/content/2712
From: Thip on 24 May 2010 20:12 "shrink4g" <shrink4g(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:htehog$8lb$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > On 5/24/2010 12:29 PM, Thip wrote: > Thank you for the third alternative. > > Reading Puran's descriptions, they sound very powerful and useful of the > provided features. Also, the free version is "no" difference then the pay > version, yet I find no comparison chart between the 2. Surely there must > be some scale back on the free one. Do you know the diff? From the site: "This is Puran Defrag Free Edition which is exactly the same as its commercial version except you do not need to pay for it. " I think the key word is "exactly." If it's crippled in any way I have yet to discover it.
From: Bob Villa on 24 May 2010 20:35 >Also, the free version is "no" difference then the pay version... In the English speaking countries..."no different than..."
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: {UPDATE} Photoscape v3.5 Next: {UPDATE} Radical Image Optimization Tool (RIOT) 0.4.1 |