Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: Stan-O on 13 Jul 2008 09:29 On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 16:30:35 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote: >> I'd explain the meaning of "a play on words", but it would be like >> pouring water on a rock and expecting it to sink in... > >With atheists, it is not a play on words. They really believe that >adulterers are the most mature adults. >Robert B. Winn You certainly have some twisted ideas about how the real world operates.
From: rbwinn on 13 Jul 2008 09:55 On Jul 12, 11:57 pm, The Natural Philosopher <a...(a)b.c> wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > > On Jul 12, 4:48 pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: > >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > >>news:e0417c27-033a-4ca8-87d9-a81f7e04025f(a)p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com.... > > >>> On Jul 12, 4:42 pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: > >>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > >>>>news:ad7f65d3-3fa2-4bfd-81f6-5ed6a97ccb30(a)34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com.... > >>>>> On Jul 12, 8:25�am, Linda Fox <linda...(a)ntlworld.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:20:29 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> A two year old is learning to lie or tell the truth. �If a two year > >>>>>>> old sees its parents lie all the time, then the two year old is going > >>>>>>> to do the same thing. > >>>>>> Ho-kayyyy - tell us please, because we'd love to know, how a > >>>>>> two-year-old can tell its parents are lying when it does not know the > >>>>>> truth itself. Unless it's by watching the nose grow longer and longer. > >>>>>> Linda ff > >>>>> A two year old is concerned about what works. If the two year old > >>>>> sees that lying is more effective in getting results than telling the > >>>>> truth, then that is what the two year old is going to start doing. > >>>>> Atheists generally reward untruth. > >>>>> Robert B. Winn > >>>> Clueless idiot. > >>>> -- > >>> And atheists generally try to punish truth.  Is that what you say to > >>> your two year old when he tells the truth? > >>> Robert B. Winn > >> Is there any point in actually replying to you, you clueless fuckwit? > >> No, I don't think so. > > >> -- > >> Steve O > > > How do you think your son is going to react when you talk to him like > > that? > > Possibly with a little respect, if he wants any in return. > > Well, as I said before, I think you are going to have problems with your son when he gets older. If you talk to him like you talk to me, he is going to talk back to you the same way. Are you ready for that? Robert B. Winn
From: The Loan Arranger on 13 Jul 2008 10:17 rbwinn wrote: > Your problem, Natural, is the same problem that all atheists have. > You never say anything. Oh, would that you were an atheist! TLA
From: rbwinn on 13 Jul 2008 10:20 On Jul 13, 12:08 am, The Natural Philosopher <a...(a)b.c> wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > > On Jul 12, 4:36�pm, "Alex W." <ing...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > >>news:1c80751f-d62b-4476-9127-9f62df713eaa(a)a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com.... > > >> � If religion is such a bedtime story, why do so many religious people > >> get killed for their beliefs? > > >> ========= > > >> Whatever makes you think this is special to religious types? �Every day in > >> the newspaper, there are examples of people killing and dying for their > >> desires and beliefs, most of which have nothing to do with god. > > > I never see much about any atheists being killed.  Why is that? > > Probably because they are smarter at not getting killed, and since they > have no beliefs, its difficult to say they died for them. > > OTOH ots of people get killed every day. Are you saying that all of them > are Christians? > Well, no, Madeliene Murray O'Hair was an atheist, and her death was well publicized. She and all the members of her family except for her rebellious son who was a Pentacostal preacher just disappeared mysteriously one day leaving their unfinished breakfast on the table. They did not find their bodies for a couple of years. For a while, they were being seen in New Zealand and other parts of the world, but that turned out to be untrue when their bodies were found on a farm in Texas where they had been murdered and buried by fellow members of their atheist society who were stealing the money from the atheist society treasury so they could buy drugs. Ms. O'Hair was not a Christian, although her son who was the object of her court case to get prayer out of school became a Pentacostal preacher. So there was one notable atheist who was killed, but she was killed by fellow atheists. Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 13 Jul 2008 10:22
On Jul 13, 12:10 am, The Natural Philosopher <a...(a)b.c> wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > > On Jul 12, 7:29�am, Stan-O <bndsna...(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:21:44 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > >> wrote: > > >>>>> You atheists seem to have a lot of trouble with the meanings of > >>>>> words. ?There was another atheist who seemed to believe that adult and > >>>>> adulterer meant the same thing. > >>>>> Robert B. Winn > >>>> ...which is an old joke that you obviously didn't get. > >>> It is a very foolish mistake. �Although the two words look and sound > >>> similar, they mean very different things. > >>> Robert B. Winn > >> I'd explain the meaning of "a play on words", but it would be like > >> pouring water on a rock and expecting it to sink in... > > > With atheists, it is not a play on words.  They really believe that > > adulterers are the most mature adults. > > Atheists don't believe anything. > > More lies from the Prince of Lies. > > Its amazing how much ore of an atheist I want to be, listening to you. > Well, there you have it. Atheists don't believe anything, they don't do anything, and they don't think anything. It does not sound very exciting to me, but maybe it does to an atheist. Robert B. Winn |