Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: rbwinn on 12 Jul 2008 18:35 On Jul 11, 5:04�pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote: > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > news:6ebcae55-3c20-4ea3-960e-25f802c31860(a)s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... > On Jul 10, 8:51?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > >news:1b629e70-db18-4208-a3da-4381dcebabb4(a)p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com.... > > On Jul 8, 8:45?pm, ben_dolan_...(a)reet.com (Ben Dolan) wrote: > > > > rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > > > There were some atheists who said Harry Potter went on the train from > > > > London to wizard's school. > > > > And once again, child, you have confused fiction with reality... > > > Harry Potter is fiction. ?The woman who wrote the books said it was > > fiction. ?I know this may come as a shock to atheists. > > =================================== > > > The bible is also fiction. We don't even know who wrote it. > > I know this may come as a shock to christians. > > Get over it. > > No, Smiler, the Bible tells about the construction of Hezekiah's > tunnel. � Didn't we discuss this before. > ================================ > And the Harry Potter books tell us about Kings Cross station and London. > Both the Harry Potter books and the bible are fiction. > Get over it. > > Smiler, > The godless one > a.a.# 2275- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Harry Potter and Kings Cross station are not even mentioned in the Bible. So how do you claim that Harry Potter and King's Cross station prove that the Bible is fiction? Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 12 Jul 2008 18:44 On Jul 12, 8:22�am, Linda Fox <linda...(a)ntlworld.com> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 05:58:08 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > wrote: > > >Well, that could be. �I had to give a speech because I had the best > >grades in my high school class. �I talked about how wonderful college > >was going to be. > > More vague prophesies? > > Linda ff False prophecies. I did not really believe what I was saying. Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 12 Jul 2008 18:49 On Jul 12, 8:25�am, Linda Fox <linda...(a)ntlworld.com> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:20:29 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > wrote: > > > > >A two year old is learning to lie or tell the truth. �If a two year > >old sees its parents lie all the time, then the two year old is going > >to do the same thing. > > Ho-kayyyy - tell us please, because we'd love to know, how a > two-year-old can tell its parents are lying when it does not know the > truth itself. Unless it's by watching the nose grow longer and longer. > > Linda ff A two year old is concerned about what works. If the two year old sees that lying is more effective in getting results than telling the truth, then that is what the two year old is going to start doing. Atheists generally reward untruth. Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 12 Jul 2008 18:55 On Jul 12, 11:58 am, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > news:9befe6a5-fc3f-4d47-93b0-bddbfa97bb06(a)34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > On Jul 12, 6:54 am, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: > >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > >>news:845bca25-7a13-463b-94c1-1f466a5ea605(a)z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com.... > > >> > On Jul 11, 1:51�pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: > >> >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > >> >>news:e730cc99-4f9a-47c2-a0e9-5a0b9903b552(a)y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... > > >> >> > Your two year old child is trying to be like you. �Didn't you say > >> >> > that > >> >> > you were an atheist? > >> >> > Robert B. Winn > > >> >> What is it about the outward appearance and behaviour of an atheist > >> >> which > >> >> you imagine is noticeable or copyable for a two year old? > > >> > I would say the fact that atheists are dishonest. > > >> My irony meter just shattered. > >> I have rarely seen dishonesty from any atheist in this newsgroup, yet I > >> have > >> witnessed a constant stream of lying, deceptive and downright unpleasant > >> theists, of which you happen to be the latest. > > >> > A two year old is learning its behavior faster at that age than at any > >> > other time. > >> > Robert B. Winn > > >> So you think a two year old is capable of distinguishing the difference > >> between theism and atheism? > >> More evidence of you delusional condition, I'm afraid to say. > > >> -- > >> Steve O > > > A two year old is learning to lie or tell the truth.  If a two year > > old sees its parents lie all the time, then the two year old is going > > to do the same thing. > > Robert B. Winn > > What on earth is it, in your twisted and convoluted mind, that you imagine > atheists lie about? > YOU are the one who is making the silly and unsubstantiated claims, and > lying through your teeth as you do so. > > -- > Steve O Well, let me know how well your two year old turned out when he becomes a teenager. See how much you like lying when it is not cute. Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 12 Jul 2008 19:30
On Jul 12, 7:29�am, Stan-O <bndsna...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:21:44 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > wrote: > > >> >You atheists seem to have a lot of trouble with the meanings of > >> >words. ?There was another atheist who seemed to believe that adult and > >> >adulterer meant the same thing. > >> >Robert B. Winn > > >> ...which is an old joke that you obviously didn't get. > > >It is a very foolish mistake. �Although the two words look and sound > >similar, they mean very different things. > >Robert B. Winn > > I'd explain the meaning of "a play on words", but it would be like > pouring water on a rock and expecting it to sink in... With atheists, it is not a play on words. They really believe that adulterers are the most mature adults. Robert B. Winn |