Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: Alex W. on 13 Jul 2008 18:47 "Linda Fox" <linda.ff(a)ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:ij7k74tnobjq7cfjqsrfidvm8ito221c6i(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:44:39 +0100, "Alex W." <ingilt(a)yahoo.co.uk> > wrote: > >> >>"Smiler" <Smiler(a)Joe.King.com> wrote in message >>news:1Acek.15296$xs1.7418(a)newsfe28.ams2... >> >> >>> >>> Sorry, but we are all 'closed minded atheists' (whatever that is) here. >> >>You misheard. We're all clothes-minded. >> > Aah, knickers t'that, y'big girl's blouse. > Oh, put a sock in it!
From: The Natural Philosopher on 13 Jul 2008 18:47 Linda Fox wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:44:39 +0100, "Alex W." <ingilt(a)yahoo.co.uk> > wrote: > >> "Smiler" <Smiler(a)Joe.King.com> wrote in message >> news:1Acek.15296$xs1.7418(a)newsfe28.ams2... >> >> >>> Sorry, but we are all 'closed minded atheists' (whatever that is) here. >> You misheard. We're all clothes-minded. >> > Aah, knickers t'that, y'big girl's blouse. > > Linda ff So good it will sail right over his head..
From: The Natural Philosopher on 13 Jul 2008 18:48 rbwinn wrote: > On Jul 13, 8:43�am, Linda Fox <linda...(a)ntlworld.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 15:49:43 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Jul 12, 8:25?am, Linda Fox <linda...(a)ntlworld.com> wrote: >>>> On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:20:29 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> A two year old is learning to lie or tell the truth. ?If a two year >>>>> old sees its parents lie all the time, then the two year old is going >>>>> to do the same thing. >>>> Ho-kayyyy - tell us please, because we'd love to know, how a >>>> two-year-old can tell its parents are lying when it does not know the >>>> truth itself. Unless it's by watching the nose grow longer and longer. >>> A two year old is concerned about what works. �If the two year old >>> sees that lying is more effective in getting results than telling the >>> truth, then that is what the two year old is going to start doing. >>> Atheists generally reward untruth. >> Right, now just go back and read again, a bit slower this time. How >> does the two-year-old know - from the example of his elders - that >> lying is more effective, when - are you still there? - he does not >> yeat recognise it as lying? >> >> Linda ff >> In the beginning man created god in his own image- Hide quoted text - >> > What you are claiming is that a two year old cannot tell if something > is true or untrue. I take the position that a two year old is just as > capable of discerning as anyone, but might have more of a tendency to > try to say the answer he believes his parent wants to hear. > Robert B. Winn Is that why you believe in the Bible then? because that's what YOUR parents wanted to hear?. I do feel very sorry for you.
From: The Natural Philosopher on 13 Jul 2008 18:49 Stan-O wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 08:00:08 -0700, DanielSan > <danielsan(a)speakeasy.net> wrote: > > >>>> Well, you have not talked to any of your fellow atheists lately. >>>> Their idea is that if Hezekiah's tunnel exists, then Harry Potter has >>>> to be true because the train station in London is mentioned in Harry >>>> Potter. >>> You are such a liar. >>> >>> Every lie you tell shows us that you don't respect the God you claim to >>> worship. You appear to be a total fake. >> I think he's misspelling the word "theist" by putting an "a" in front of >> the word, because everything he ascribes to atheists is actually true of >> theists. >> >> Let's give him the benefit of the doubt.... ;-) > > It would be better to sign an organ donor card and give him a brain... He couldn't handle mine. It would kill him.
From: rbwinn on 13 Jul 2008 18:51
On Jul 13, 10:12 am, "pba...(a)worldonline.nl" <pba...(a)worldonline.nl> wrote: > On 13 jul, 16:22, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 12:10 am, The Natural Philosopher <a...(a)b.c> wrote: > > > > rbwinn wrote: > > > > On Jul 12, 7:29�am, Stan-O <bndsna...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:21:44 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > > >>>>> You atheists seem to have a lot of trouble with the meanings of > > > >>>>> words. ?There was another atheist who seemed to believe that adult and > > > >>>>> adulterer meant the same thing. > > > >>>>> Robert B. Winn > > > >>>> ...which is an old joke that you obviously didn't get. > > > >>> It is a very foolish mistake. �Although the two words look and sound > > > >>> similar, they mean very different things. > > > >>> Robert B. Winn > > > >> I'd explain the meaning of "a play on words", but it would be like > > > >> pouring water on a rock and expecting it to sink in... > > > > > With atheists, it is not a play on words.  They really believe that > > > > adulterers are the most mature adults. > > > > Atheists don't believe anything. > > > > More lies from the Prince of Lies. > > > > Its amazing how much ore of an atheist I want to be, listening to you.. > > > Well, there you have it.  Atheists don't believe anything, they don't > > do anything, and they don't think anything.  It does not sound very > > exciting to me, but maybe it does to an atheist. > > Robert B. Winn- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven - > > > - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven - > > Well. Atheist are not lying their butt off like you do. > Most of them believe in natural explanations, > most of them have a job, > and many of them are intelligent enough not to make as silly a claim > as to say someone else doesn't think anything. > > Your statement would be truth though if it was made about dead people. > But if all dead people are atheists, what would that mean for heaven > and hell? > > Think about it! > I am sure you have enough brains to understand, > I only doubt whether you will use them on this issue or perfer to keep > making silly statements > > Peter van Velzen Thank you for your analysis, Peter. I was merely expanding on a statement from an atheist to show where it was leading: Atheists do not believe anything. Robert B. Winn |