Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?
in [Logic]
|
From: Patricia Aldoraz on 25 Dec 2009 22:18 On Dec 13, 10:08 pm, Tim <tbees...(a)aci.on.ca> wrote: > On Dec 13, 2:29 am, Michael Gordge <mikegor...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > > > On Dec 13, 1:01 pm, Immortalista <extro...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge? > > > Clue for the idiots, preceeding reasoning with an adjective does not > > change the meaning of reasoing. > > > MG > > So then deduction and induction are the same thing? Talk about idiocy! That is *not * a consequence of what Michael is saying. So be a bit careful who ewe are calling an idiot. Michael is making the astute point that using the adjective does not add or give the slightest insight into the reasoning or intelligence element to general scientific or indeed everyday reasoning that is not merely deductive.
From: Patricia Aldoraz on 25 Dec 2009 23:48 On Dec 26, 2:53 pm, Michael Gordge <mikegor...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > Clue I don't think it is in your best interests to use this word, Michael.
From: Monsieur Turtoni on 26 Dec 2009 00:24 Patricia Aldoraz wrote: (snip) Pat when you hit the wall you should at least shave those flabby basketweaving armpits.
From: Michael Gordge on 26 Dec 2009 02:00 On Dec 26, 1:48 pm, Patricia Aldoraz <patricia.aldo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't think.......... Thats always been obvious, it happens when ewe allow your mind to become engaged in eating / destroying itself. MG
From: Zinnic on 26 Dec 2009 02:54
On Dec 25, 9:18 pm, Patricia Aldoraz <patricia.aldo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 13, 10:08 pm, Tim <tbees...(a)aci.on.ca> wrote: > > > On Dec 13, 2:29 am, Michael Gordge <mikegor...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > > > > On Dec 13, 1:01 pm, Immortalista <extro...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge? > > > > Clue for the idiots, preceeding reasoning with an adjective does not > > > change the meaning of reasoing. > > > > MG > > > So then deduction and induction are the same thing? Talk about idiocy! > > That is *not * a consequence of what Michael is saying. So be a bit > careful who ewe are calling an idiot. Michael is making the astute > point that using the adjective does not add or give the slightest > insight into the reasoning or intelligence element to general > scientific or indeed everyday reasoning that is not merely deductive. Suck, suck, suck. |