Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?
in [Logic]
|
From: Michael Gordge on 2 Jan 2010 19:24 On Jan 2, 10:37 pm, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote: > > I understood what he meant. But ewe'd prefer not to say for fear of sounding as stupid as PD. MG
From: Patricia Aldoraz on 2 Jan 2010 19:24 On Jan 3, 12:42 am, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote: > Patricia Aldoraz wrote: > > On Jan 2, 1:08 am, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote: > >> Patricia Aldoraz wrote: > >>> On Jan 1, 4:23 am, John Stafford <n...(a)droffats.net> wrote: > >>>> Inductive reasoning can lead to practical and theoretical understanding, > >>>> which is knowledge. > >>> Such a wonderfully instructive and enlightening statement at this > >>> stage! Christ! > >> No, his name John. > > > You are a corny simple-minded little jerk > > And no humor on top of everything else. > Hang on! I thought you said you were not going top bother with me any more? Anyway, never mind, I am used to you usenet guys acting like hypocrites. But on now to a more serious matter: humour! To say you are corny, you little ignorant jerk, is to criticise your sense of humour. It is to complain about its crudeness. That is what corny means, you little jerk. It is not evidence of a lack of humour. Not only your humour is wanting but your logic. Apply the Scientific Method to investigate your logical skills.
From: Patricia Aldoraz on 2 Jan 2010 19:27 On Jan 3, 12:33 am, Zinnic <zeenr...(a)gate.net> wrote: > On Jan 2, 12:17 am, Patricia Aldoraz <patricia.aldo...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > At least Zinnic was starting to ask a few pertinent questions. You are > > such a sad lot. > > Hey! No fair teach. Please please take that back and tell me that I, > ZINNIC, am still at the bottom of your class. You have not done enough bad things lately. You are trying to gain an unfair advantage over that prick Stafford and Dutch! You fail. They are beating you to the bottom.
From: John Stafford on 2 Jan 2010 19:29 In article <f78e048c-6e96-4a80-bc56-a15b5292b682(a)a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, Patricia Aldoraz <patricia.aldoraz(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 3, 12:42�am, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote: > > Patricia Aldoraz wrote: > > > On Jan 2, 1:08 am, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote: > > >> Patricia Aldoraz wrote: > > >>> On Jan 1, 4:23 am, John Stafford <n...(a)droffats.net> wrote: > > >>>> Inductive reasoning can lead to practical and theoretical > > >>>> understanding, > > >>>> which is knowledge. > > >>> Such a wonderfully instructive and enlightening statement at this > > >>> stage! Christ! > > >> No, his name John. � > > > > > You are a corny simple-minded little jerk > > > > And no humor on top of everything else. > > > > Hang on! I thought you said you were not going top bother with me any > more? > > Anyway, never mind, I am used to you usenet guys acting like > hypocrites. > > But on now to a more serious matter: humour! To say you are corny, you > little ignorant jerk, is to criticise your sense of humour. It is to > complain about its crudeness. That is what corny means, you little > jerk. It is not evidence of a lack of humour. Not only your humour is > wanting but your logic. Apply the Scientific Method to investigate > your logical skills. Bluster, bluster. Raging insane nonsense. Aldoraz is once again backing into a corner spewing insults rather than contributing to the subject. Pity.
From: Patricia Aldoraz on 2 Jan 2010 19:29
On Jan 3, 12:51 am, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote: > Well, now I'm considering that I don't know when I'm using > inductive reasoning when I'm thinking about a problem. Neither does Stafford. He just waves his hand to websites and to Scientific Method. You are so gullible! |