Experts doubt Einstein..... but Einstein Dingleberries still worship him
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Quantum Gravity 398.0: USA Proves Flexagons Related to Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
Next: The Necessity of an experiment (classical electrodynamics) that should have been done 100 years ago
From: PD on 4 Jun 2010 13:05 On Jun 4, 11:59 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: [spam] When you don't want to face facts, drown it out with cut-n-paste spam. Lots and lots of it. Until the maddening voices go away.
From: Androcles on 4 Jun 2010 13:46 <paparios(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:9b8b35f6-533b-479e-8b85-57f4bfaafd56(a)u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com... | On 4 jun, 11:41, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: | | You continue, again and again, to proof to all of us your | insanity!!!. Get help!!! | | Miguel Rios | | "Well this is the last time I respond to your idiocies. You are to old and dumb to be here wasting our time. x1=(x'1+vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)" -- papabozo Ref: news:90f88419-b50e-445b-826a-0136aff5f79e(a)5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com ======================================== Bwahahahahahaha! x'1 = (x1-vt)/ sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) x1-vt = x'1 * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) x1 = x'1*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) + vt Papa bozo is too stupid to manage simple schoolboy algebra!
From: PD on 4 Jun 2010 15:40 On Jun 4, 12:19 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: [more spam] Very good, boy. You do it on command. Watch: I'm going to snap my fingers....SO!
From: mpc755 on 4 Jun 2010 15:46 What physically occurs in nature to cause curved 'space-time', E=mc^2, conservation of mass, conservation of energy, gravity, double slit experiments, Higg's background field, what physically occurs in nature to cause atomic clocks to 'tick' at different rates, Einstein's train gedanken, and on and on and on the list of things which are misunderstood in physics today are easily understood in the theory of Aether Displacement. 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein' http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... disregarding the causes which condition its state." The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the aether's state of displacement. Aether and matter are different states of the same material. The material is mæther. Mæther has mass. Aether and matter have mass. Aether is uncompressed mæther and matter is compressed mæther. Aether is displaced by matter. The aether is not at rest when displaced and 'displaces back'. The 'displacing back' is the pressure exerted by the aether. Gravity is pressure exerted by displaced aether towards matter. A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit. The aether wave enters and exits multiple slits. The aether wave creates interference upon exiting the slits which alters the direction the C-60 molecule travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the aether wave and there is no interference. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. EINSTEIN' http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is energy. Mass does not convert to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the mæther transitions from matter to aether it increases in volume. The physical effect the increase in volume has on the neighboring matter and aether is energy. The physical effect of mæther decompressing is energy. Mass is conserved. The rate at which an atomic clock 'ticks' is based upon the aether pressure in which it exists. In terms of motion, the speed of a GPS satellite with respect to the aether causes it to displace more aether and for that aether to exert more pressure on the clock in the GPS satellite than the aether pressure associated with a clock at rest with respect to the Earth. This causes the GPS satellite clock to "result in a delay of about 7 ìs/day". The aether pressure associated with the aether displaced by the Earth exerts less pressure on the GPS satellite than a similar clock at rest on the Earth" causing the GPS clocks to appear faster by about 45 ìs/day". The aether pressure associated with the speed at which the GPS satellite moves with respect to the aether and the aether pressure associated with the aether displaced by the Earth causes "clocks on the GPS satellites [to] tick approximately 38 ìs/day faster than clocks on the ground." (quoted text from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_relativity_on_GPS). 'The Need to Understand Mass' By Roger Cashmore Department of Physics University of Oxford, UK. http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/courses/phy400w/particle/higgs2.htm "There is, however, one very clever and very elegant solution to this problem, a solution first proposed by Peter Higgs. He proposed that the whole of space is permeated by a field, similar in some ways to the electromagnetic field. As particles move through space they travel through this field, and if they interact with it they acquire what appears to be mass. This is similar to the action of viscous forces felt by particles moving through any thick liquid. the larger the interaction of the particles with the field, the more mass they appear to have. Thus the existence of this field is essential in Higg's hypothesis for the production of the mass of particles." The "action of viscous forces felt by particles moving through any thick liquid" is the particles interaction with the aether. The force is the pressure exerted by the displaced aether towards the particle. The "thick liquid" is the aether behaving as a frictionless superfluid 'one something'. "the larger the interaction of the particles with the field, the more mass they appear to have." The faster the particle moves with respect to the aether, the greater the pressure exerted by the displaced aether towards the particle. 'Politics, Solid State and the Higgs' By David Miller Department of Physics and Astronomy University College, London, UK. http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/courses/phy400w/particle/higgs3.htm "1. The Higgs Mechanism In three dimensions, and with the complications of relativity, this is the Higgs mechanism. In order to give particles mass, a background field is invented which becomes locally distorted whenever a particle moves through it. The distortion - the clustering of the field around the particle - generates the particle's mass. The idea comes directly from the physics of solids. Instead of a field spread throughout all space a solid contains a lattice of positively charged crystal atoms. When an electron moves through the lattice the atoms are attracted to it, causing the electron's effective mass to be as much as 40 times bigger than the mass of a free electron." The distortion of the background field is the displacement of the aether by the moving particle. The 'clustering' of the field around the particle is the 'displacing back'. The 'clustering' of the field is the pressure exerted by the displaced aether towards the particle. "The idea comes directly from the physics of solids." The aether behaves as a frictionless superfluid 'one something'.
From: Me, ...again! on 4 Jun 2010 16:12
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Martin Brown wrote: > On 03/06/2010 13:26, Me, ...again! wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Martin Brown wrote: >> >>> I think you really need to learn to recognise Usenet kooks. >> >> Oh, I've had two decades of experience. But, I was happy to see serious >> discussion following my posts of the book list. >> >>> By any reasonable definition Einstein was a *genius*. His >>> contributions to quantum mechaincs and relativity were both very >>> important to modern physics. It is telling that even today so many >>> people cannot cope with the mathematical insights he provided. As I >>> pointed out before the derivation of the Einstein-Lorentz equations >>> for special relativity can be done with nothing more than >>> consideration of two metre rules passing each other and cataloguing >>> the mutual events. >> >> I will defer the arguments to people who know the material much better >> than I know it, and I have not studied this stuff since college days >> (many decades ago, and my career went into biology and out of physics, >> anyway). One way I judge any area of study is by finding the "experts" >> and trying to learn what controversies and interpretations are currently >> being entertained, what claims are being made and refuted, and what is >> being said in the newspapers compared to what is being said in the >> scholarly monographs and review papers and by people who do this stuff >> for a living and have been doing it for decades, too. > > For that to work you have to know enough about the subject be able to > distinguish who are the experts and the ever present netkooks. What you have > posted so far and your "methodology" suggests that you cannot. Well, you and I are in disagreement. > There may be others like Hilbert and Ricci who should get more public credit > for their contributions (particularly on the mathematics) but Einstein > brought it all together and provided the inspired physical interpretation. > Nothing that any of these deranged nutters says can alter the fact that every > experiment to date has confirmed the theory. Namecalling is not legitamate refutation. > Regards, > Martin Brown > |