From: alexd on
On 18/03/10 15:53, Roy wrote:


> Seoul has a density of 44,000 people per square mile, San Jose is less
> than 6,000. San Francisco is less than 7,000. NYC is around 27,000.

Nuenen in the Netherlands has a pop den of 1742/sq mile and they've all
[90%] got fibre:

http://www.rogerdarlington.me.uk/Nuenen.html

Eindhoven is next. I'm sure you God-fearing capitalists will abhor the
idea of a co-operative building a broadband network, but hey, your loss!

--
<http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpEaTm(a)ale.cx)
17:13:24 up 43 days, 17:17, 3 users, load average: 0.05, 0.16, 0.12
It is better to have been wasted and then sober
than to never have been wasted at all
From: John Higdon on
In article <ho0cho$1la$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
alexd <troffasky(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

> On 18/03/10 15:53, Roy wrote:
>
>
> > Seoul has a density of 44,000 people per square mile, San Jose is less
> > than 6,000. San Francisco is less than 7,000. NYC is around 27,000.
>
> Nuenen in the Netherlands has a pop den of 1742/sq mile and they've all
> [90%] got fibre:
>
> http://www.rogerdarlington.me.uk/Nuenen.html
>
> Eindhoven is next. I'm sure you God-fearing capitalists will abhor the
> idea of a co-operative building a broadband network, but hey, your loss!

Iceland is very well connected. I never knew that Iceland was a highly
dense country.

--
John Higdon
+1 408 ANdrews 6-4400
AT&T-Free At Last
From: John Richards on
"alexd" <troffasky(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ho0cho$1la$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
> Nuenen in the Netherlands has a pop den of 1742/sq mile and they've all
> [90%] got fibre:
>
> http://www.rogerdarlington.me.uk/Nuenen.html
>
> Eindhoven is next. I'm sure you God-fearing capitalists will abhor the
> idea of a co-operative building a broadband network, but hey, your loss!

Government interference through various subsidies hides the true cost of
providing such service. It boils down to a willingness by everyone to pay
higher taxes in order to get more cradle-to-grave services. Most Americans
are unwilling to pay higher taxes.

--
John Richards
From: John Higdon on
In article <ho0fot$ikt$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
"John Richards" <JR(a)blackhole.invalid> wrote:

> Government interference through various subsidies hides the true cost of
> providing such service. It boils down to a willingness by everyone to pay
> higher taxes in order to get more cradle-to-grave services. Most Americans
> are unwilling to pay higher taxes.

We have too much of the Internet in this country handled by huge
corporations that are also content providers. They have a vested
interest in keeping consumer Internet access crippled. After all, they
don't want people streaming in program material from competing content
providers over *their* wires, as David Whitaker, former CEO of SBC put
it.

It may be that "government interference" may be the only way we get
anything at all at any kind of affordable price to the user. I'm not
putting a lot of faith in Comcast or AT&T.

--
John Higdon
+1 408 ANdrews 6-4400
AT&T-Free At Last
From: Roy on
On 3/19/2010 10:52 AM, John Higdon wrote:
> In article<ho0cho$1la$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
> alexd<troffasky(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 18/03/10 15:53, Roy wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Seoul has a density of 44,000 people per square mile, San Jose is less
>>> than 6,000. San Francisco is less than 7,000. NYC is around 27,000.
>>
>> Nuenen in the Netherlands has a pop den of 1742/sq mile and they've all
>> [90%] got fibre:
>>
>> http://www.rogerdarlington.me.uk/Nuenen.html
>>
>> Eindhoven is next. I'm sure you God-fearing capitalists will abhor the
>> idea of a co-operative building a broadband network, but hey, your loss!
>
> Iceland is very well connected. I never knew that Iceland was a highly
> dense country.
>

60% of the population lives in one city which occupies 300 square miles
(think 30 by 10 miles).

The country is basically bankrupt

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008%E2%80%932009_Icelandic_financial_crisis