From: George Kerby on 29 May 2010 14:02 On 5/29/10 10:09 AM, in article elmop-9766E3.11094229052010(a)news.eternal-september.org, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop(a)nastydesigns.com> wrote: > In article <q19206h473eu9mnkedh9g1iqh73v0hkpok(a)4ax.com>, > John Navas <jnspam1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >> Newtonian affair grows cold >> By Rik Myslewski in San Francisco >> >> As the iPad goes on sale in the UK (and eight other countries), I've >> had my own "magical and revolutionary" Apple tablet for exactly 56 >> days. And I'm using it less and less each day. >> >> My fading relationship with my iPad reminds me of a long-ago college >> fling with a young lovely. High anticipation, fervent consummation, >> growing familiarization, decreasing fascination, and the inevitable: >> "No, hon, it's not you. It's me." >> >> Which is the line you use even when you're pretty damn sure that it >> is indeed her. >> >> Full disclosure: I write this as a fervent fanboi who has used Macs >> since literally the first day that the original Macintosh 128k became >> available in 1984. I've partnered with and enjoyed PowerBooks, >> Quadras, Performas, iMacs, Power Macs, MacBooks, Mac Pros, and >> iPhones � even a Newton. >> >> But of all of those Apple products, it's my whirlwind affair with the >> Newton that most reminds me of my first 56 days with my iPad. >> >> With the Newton, as with the iPad, I eagerly anticipated its release, >> and bagged one as soon as I could. I took it on business trips for >> note-taking and email, had no problems with its much-maligned >> handwriting recognition, and even played the occasional game on it. >> >> But after the first blush of novelty wore off, the Newton's flaws >> asserted themselves: small display, unpocketable bulk, non-standard >> file system, and so on. I found myself spending less and less time >> with it, and soon returned to my previous partner, my trusty >> PowerBook 170. >> >> So it has been with the iPad. ... >> >> MORE: >> <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/28/ipad_love_affair_goes_sour/>: > > It's amazing that people feel a need to hate an inanimate object. Yeah, > Navas, I'm talking about you and those like you (see Gizmodo for good > examples). > > I don't have an iPad, and I don't think I want one. But I don't hate it > any more than I hate any other things I don't feel a need for. More > importantly, I don't feel the burning need to spend energy actively > hating it and telling people how much I hate it and how bad it must be. > > What drives that behavior of yours, Navas? > > Oh, I know--mental instability. Correct. The lithium has worn out and "Sybil" has come out of NavAss. If an inanimate object is not on the NavAss Official List of Approved Products�, it obviously is inferior and must be challenged as to it's 'worthiness' of ever existing, and NO one should have any reason for having such a despised object. It is The Law of NavAss and NO ONE should EVER question the NavAss wisdom. Be it said. It is done.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Verizon Iphone coming? Was: Qs about Verizon Droid Next: Linksys 54G wireless Problem |