Prev: practice online trading. platinum online trading. online trading worldwide. online trading which is best
Next: variant data type
From: Lynn McGuire on 29 Jun 2010 17:05 >> However, I find that the programmer is more important than the >> language. Good programmers can write good code in any language. >> Bad programmers can screw anything up. > > Fortran programmers can write Fortran in any language. :-) I was waiting for that ! Lynn
From: Colin Watters on 29 Jun 2010 17:15 Fortran is the worst programming language, apart from all the others for which compilers have been written from time to time. -- Qolin Email: my qname at domain dot com Domain: qomputing "Gib Bogle" <g.bogle(a)auckland.no.spam.ac.nz> wrote in message news:i0c529$5rh$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... > Jerry DeLisle wrote: > >> In spite of all the arguments, Fortran (as it continues to evolve) is at >> a very minimum, damn good! > > I don't like Fortran > oh no > I love it!
From: Lynn McGuire on 29 Jun 2010 17:20 > There are many Fortran compilers written in C, as far as I know, > no C compilers written in Fortran. If the old Prime computers had a C compiler, it was probably written in Fortran. The whole operating system was written in a heavily extended fortran 66 until the 198? release which was rewritten in PL/1. Lynn
From: Colin Watters on 29 Jun 2010 17:22 Here is an even more dated paper (1893) comparing Fortran and some other languages: http://www.pbm.com/~lindahl/real.programmers.html -- Qolin Email: my qname at domain dot com Domain: qomputing "Lynn McGuire" <lmc(a)winsim.com> wrote in message news:i0b9nl$809$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> What can Fortran do that C, C++, C# can't? >> >> Along similar lines where would Fortran be a superior chice over C, C+ >> +, or C# > > None that I know of. Here is a dated (1992) paper comparing F77, > F90, C and C++ for engineering pgrograms: > http://www.leshatton.org/Documents/JSX_0192.pdf > > Me, myself and I, we all prefer C++. I like strong typing and > mandatory function prototypes. I also like function overloading. > > However, I find that the programmer is more important than the > language. Good programmers can write good code in any language. > Bad programmers can screw anything up. > > Lynn
From: Luka Djigas on 29 Jun 2010 17:32
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:44:49 -0700, "Steve Fry" <scfry(a)raytheon.com> wrote: >"rfengineer55" asked this question: >> What can Fortran do that C, C++, C# can't? >> >> Along similar lines where would Fortran be a superior chice over C, C+ >> +, or C# >> > >Since the CPUs on todays computers are not getting any faster (as was >promised 20 years ago), my main concern is what will crunch numbers faster. > Based on what criteria ? The last time I checked, Moore's law still holds. Luka |