GOD, RELATIVITY & THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
in [Relativity]
|
From: M Otis Beard on 11 Nov 2009 15:10 On Nov 11, 11:30 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.net> wrote: > > [Hammond] > Not only do I have an advanced degree in science "I have a Master's degree... in SCIENCE!"
From: M Otis Beard on 11 Nov 2009 15:20 On Nov 11, 11:30 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.net> wrote: > > So the ancient Greeks were 2500 years ahead of modern > science, they guessed 12 and the actual answer is 13. That's > 92% mathematical accuracy, pretty good for 500 BC in my > opinion. > > Like I say sarge, modern science has now proven that they > were scientifically correct. > > Not only do I have an advanced degree in science and > mathematics, I'm the one that has discovered and published > in the peer-reviewed literature that the ancient Greeks were > scientifically correct to 92% accuracy. SCIENCE WORLD STUNNED AS HAMMOND PROVES THAT 12 is 92% of 13 LARGE HADRON COLLIDER SCIENTICIANS ABANDON THEIR POSTS, SAYING "WHAT'S THE POINT NOW?" "NO COMMENT" SAYS OMNISCIENT OMNIPOTENT ANTHROPOMORPHIC CREATOR AND RULER OF UNIVERSE NIETZSCHE DUG UP AND TARRED, FEATHERED BY ANGRY MOB
From: Jimbo on 11 Nov 2009 15:29 On Nov 11, 2:43 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.net> wrote: > On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:00:27 -0800 (PST), Jimbo > > <ckdbig...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > It's a common fallacy to > >> >assume your conclusion, then try to prop it up. > > >> [Hammond] > >> Never did that. I derived a proven result. > > >Yes, you most certainly did. > > [Hammond] > Your apology is magnanimously accepted. > Your idiocy is duly noted.
From: John Stafford on 11 Nov 2009 15:40 In article <169ef0b0-4936-4eb9-8dce-5b9c803605f0(a)h14g2000pri.googlegroups.com>, M Otis Beard <atomdebris(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 11, 11:30�am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.net> wrote: > > > > [Hammond] > > � �Not only do I have an advanced degree in science > > > "I have a Master's degree... in SCIENCE!" Soil Science.
From: Doctroid on 11 Nov 2009 14:46
In article <6e2d9092-7bad-4c94-b470-2e9b3eda6aea(a)g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, M Otis Beard <atomdebris(a)gmail.com> wrote: > SCIENCE WORLD STUNNED AS HAMMOND PROVES THAT 12 is 92% of 13 > > LARGE HADRON COLLIDER SCIENTICIANS ABANDON THEIR POSTS, SAYING "WHAT'S > THE POINT NOW?" Your fatuous sarcasm is wholly inappropriate, Beard. As you would know if you were even casually acquainted with recent results of string theory, the predicted value (in a third order perturbative calculation) of 92% of 13 is 11.93 +- 0.04, or nearly two standard deviations below 12, a discrepancy that has the potential to rock physics to its very foundations if confirmed. The LHC should be able to provide a measurement of 92% of 12 within its first three years with an error bar of +- 0.06% if the damn birds stop dropping bread on it. -- Sig available on request. - Doctroid |