Goddamned programmers are incompetent!
in [Suse]
|
From: StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt on 6 Nov 2009 20:52 On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:51:06 -0700, Kevin Nathan <knathan(a)project54.com> wrote: > I don't know what your OS is >(I am assuming you are writing your own), If all you are going to do is make stupid cracks, you should just go back to your masturbation session, because you will fail at jacking my brain, boy.
From: StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt on 6 Nov 2009 21:10 On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:02:29 -0900, Kevin Miller <atftb2(a)alaska.net> wrote: >Kevin Nathan wrote: >> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 07:12:40 -0600 >> Neil Ellwood <cral.elllwood(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:59:44 -0800, StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Talk about stupid. Show us where I said anything about paying for >>>> Usenet OR my news reader, you retarded twit. >>> >>> You are getting more than you paid for. >> >> He uses Forte Agent, which is *not* free and only runs on Windows, it >> has *no* native Linux version. If he is not paying for it, then he is a >> thief as well as an idiot... :-) > >But virtualbox does run under windows. Really? No! > If he installs Linux there, it >won't touch his boot loader. Oh boy! I'm really interested in emulated OSes that run several tens of percentage points slower than native boots. NOT! > Problem solved. Well, technical problem >anyway. Social skills are still apparently an alpha release... I have over 120 GB of ROMs for my emulation needs. I have done more variants of Linux installs than a twit like you has. How many ALPHA boxes do you have? I have one, and TWO SBCs for it. You are out of your league, boy. If you retarded had examined the problem instead of being peanut gallery retard wanna bes, you wouldn't be getting the south end of my social prowess.
From: StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt on 6 Nov 2009 21:11 On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:56 -0500, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap(a)library.lspace.org.invalid> wrote: > >I would see the claim as a warning if it came from a reliable source. Something you do not have the capacity to discern the nature of.
From: StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt on 6 Nov 2009 21:11 On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:37:41 -0700, Kevin Nathan <knathan(a)project54.com> wrote: >On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:41:11 -0500 >Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap(a)library.lspace.org.invalid> wrote: > >>Didn't su madre la puta teach you that "media" is plural? > >ROFLMAO! :-) Yet you make claims of maturity. I know better.
From: wolfgang kern on 7 Nov 2009 04:36
Kevin Nathan replied: > I wrote: >> I'm quite new to Linux and just checked an older SUSE 10.2 install >> to run aside an M$ boot loader (windoze or DOS 6) and my own OS. > When I first started running Linux (Red Hat 4.x), I was dual booting > with Win95 and, later, Win98. IIRC, I was using lilo and it was > difficult to get right and finally found XOSL. This bootloader was > really nice and I used it for several years. When I switched to SuSE > around 7.0 I continued to use it, but was keeping my eye on the new > 'GRUB' (before GNU took it over). I eventually switched to GRUB and > have used it ever since. I stopped dual booting in 2000 when I switched > to Linux exclusively. I'd like to get rid if windoze anyway, but I still miss a few things like HW-drivers [MSI DKA 790gx platin, HUAWEI3G] in Linux to make me fully swap. >> Grub seem to need the first partition on a boot-drive and wont >> (of course) be able to see my OS as a bootable partition at all. > *All* bootloaders need to access the MBR. I don't know what your OS is > (I am assuming you are writing your own), but if it can boot from the > boot record of its main partition, GRUB should be able to load it. It was/is my intention to isolate my OS(KESYS) and stay hidden for other systems in any case. So it doesn't follow any standards, not at least for security reasons. >> My workaround for the moment is to have my stuff on separate drives >> and use the BIOS-boot option to overcome GRUB inabilities. >> For near future I planned to create my own bootloader which then may >> understand Lunix, WinShit, and perhaps also Mac beside my very own >> partition types. > You don't need to write your own bootloader, unless you just want to do > it. GRUB handles Linux and Windows just fine. Again, I don't know what > your OS is, but I imagine it's possible to make it work, too. Yeah, I could make it standard Boot, but as mentiones above, I wont want :) > I don't > know about Mac but, if it's the OS/X version I would assume it will be > able to handle that since it's based on FreeBSD -- no experience there, > yet, so that may be inaccurate. I'll check on Mac some day ... > If you really want to write your own bootloader, I would suggest > reading through this: > http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/multiboot/multiboot.html > And for information on GRUB and GRUB 2, see: > http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/ > and follow the various links. > Good luck! :-) Many thanks Kevin, __ wolfgang |