Google Chrome 5.0 vs Mozilla 3.x
in [Freeware]
|
Prev: alt.comp.freeware links at Mon Jun 7 21:20:01 2010
Next: alt.comp.freeware newsgroup statistics for 05/2010
From: Man-wai Chang to The Door (33600bps) on 7 Jun 2010 07:37 I noticed a report claiming that Chrome 5.0 was a lot faster than Mozilla 3.x! And Opera 10 was on par with Chrome 5.0! Is it really true? -- @~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY. / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you! /( _ )\ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.34 ^ ^ 19:36:01 up 19 days 22:47 2 users load average: 1.27 1.16 1.10 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
From: Martin Jay on 7 Jun 2010 07:57 On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:37:54 +0800, "Man-wai Chang to The Door (33600bps)" <toylet.toylet(a)gmail.com> wrote: >I noticed a report claiming that Chrome 5.0 was a lot faster than >Mozilla 3.x! And Opera 10 was on par with Chrome 5.0! > >Is it really true? What is faster? Faster program loading time? Faster rendering of HTML? Faster Javascript execution? Whichever way you look at it, Firefox is sluggish when compared to Chrome. I find Opera takes longer to load than Chrome, but once it's up and running it's pretty nippy. -- Martin Jay
From: Mike Easter on 7 Jun 2010 08:45 Man-wai Chang to The Door (33600bps) wrote: > > I noticed a report claiming that Chrome 5.0 was a lot faster than > Mozilla 3.x! And Opera 10 was on par with Chrome 5.0! > > Is it really true? > You notice an unlinked report. I saw a 2010 Feb betanews report (Opera 10.5 beta beats Chrome 5 dev), but I haven't seen the latest Opera 10.60 alpha compared to the latest Chrome 5 development version. http://peek.snipr.com/x6o2d Opera's lead over Chrome is no longer a narrow gap. -- Mike Easter
From: Man-wai Chang to The Door (33600bps) on 7 Jun 2010 08:48 > Faster rendering of HTML? > Faster Javascript execution? These two. There is a table in a local computer magazine PC Market. The tests showed that Chrome was like 5-10 times faster than Mozilla. > Whichever way you look at it, Firefox is sluggish when compared to > Chrome. > I find Opera takes longer to load than Chrome, but once it's up and > running it's pretty nippy. I see. -- @~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY. / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you! /( _ )\ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.34 ^ ^ 20:46:01 up 19 days 23:57 2 users load average: 1.10 1.09 1.07 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
From: Craig on 7 Jun 2010 08:59
On 06/07/2010 04:37 AM, Man-wai Chang to The Door (33600bps) wrote: > I noticed a report claiming that Chrome 5.0 was a lot faster Absolutely! Indubitably! Except in certain, broad and poorly-defined situations. "hth," -- -Craig |