Prev: spam
Next: "Canceled opening the page" (Safari)
From: TaliesinSoft on 16 Nov 2009 01:06 And I speculate that there are those who will sue because their hearing has been damaged from playing things loud when they have on earphones. This, to me, is another of those "its not my fault" incidents. Why is it that individual responsibility has so fallen asunder? -- James Leo Ryan --- Austin, Texas --- taliesinsoft(a)me.com
From: Thomas R. Kettler on 16 Nov 2009 14:04 In article <0001HW.C726481C00016D4BB01029BF(a)News.Individual.NET>, TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft(a)me.com> wrote: > And I speculate that there are those who will sue because their hearing has > been damaged from playing things loud when they have on earphones. This, to > me, is another of those "its not my fault" incidents. Why is it that > individual responsibility has so fallen asunder? Yes, everyone should follow the taking of responsibility example set by the Wall Street Finance CEO's for the banking mess. -- Remove blown from email address to reply.
From: Mike Rosenberg on 16 Nov 2009 18:02 Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > In fairness to Ms. Liebeck, she initially asked for around $2500, her > out of pocket expenses for the burn. It was turned down by McD's and she > then got an attorney involved. After that it was just... An attorney friend filled me in on the details of that case. I wasn't aware that, at the time, McD's hot coffee was routinely considerably hotter than that of other fast food joints, that they had gotten numerous complaints about the temperature, that other people had already been burned, albeit less severely, and so on. There was a lot more to the case than we the public were aware of. -- My latest dance performance <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvB98fgse-s> Mac and geek T-shirts & gifts <http://designsbymike.net/shop/mac.cgi> Prius shirts/bumper stickers <http://designsbymike.net/shop/prius.cgi>
From: Mike Rosenberg on 16 Nov 2009 18:25 Mike Rosenberg <mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com> wrote: > > In fairness to Ms. Liebeck, she initially asked for around $2500, her > > out of pocket expenses for the burn. It was turned down by McD's and she > > then got an attorney involved. After that it was just... > > An attorney friend filled me in on the details of that case. I wasn't > aware that, at the time, McD's hot coffee was routinely considerably > hotter than that of other fast food joints, that they had gotten > numerous complaints about the temperature, that other people had already > been burned, albeit less severely, and so on. There was a lot more to > the case than we the public were aware of. http://lawandhelp.com/q298-2.htm -- My latest dance performance <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvB98fgse-s> Mac and geek T-shirts & gifts <http://designsbymike.net/shop/mac.cgi> Prius shirts/bumper stickers <http://designsbymike.net/shop/prius.cgi>
From: BakersT on 16 Nov 2009 19:15
In article <1j9blb4.1kyo21i1623iavN%jamiekg(a)wizardling.geek.nz>, jamiekg(a)wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) wrote: > Sadly the stupid need to be protected from hurting the rest of us as > they thrash about in their moronic screwups. If there was a way to > contain the effects of their idiocy to only them it would solve all our > problems. > [snip] > > Thus what we need to develop is the perfect trap for the stupid that has > no fallout that can affect us. Any thoughts? :-) I've got one: let's offer them loans to buy homes that they obviously can't afford, using terms they won't bother to understand, and then when... Oh, wait. You said "no fallout that can affect us", didn't you. Never mind. |