From: AV3 on
Jamie Kahn Genet wrote:
> AV3 <arvimide(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> Nick Naym wrote:
>>> In article 171120091055449487%nospam(a)nospam.invalid, nospam at
>>> nospam(a)nospam.invalid wrote on 11/17/09 11:55 AM:
>>>
>>>> In article <rowbotth-86259F.09422717112009(a)news.newsgroupdirect.com>,
>>>> Rowbotth <rowbotth(a)telusplanet.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ...
>
> I've never made a coffee that wasn't hot enough to cause serious burns
> if spilt all over myself.



Of course, the victim didn't get her coffee fresh from the pot in the
kitchen, but was sold a substance supposedly ready to drink at some
remove from the pot.


Do you drink from styrofoam at home? As someone else remarked, something
resembling porcelain reduces the temperature differently from styrofoam,
so home consumption isn't directly comparable. As established by ample
evidence at the trial, the serving temperature at MacDonald's was
appreciably higher than the serving temperature at other such
establishments, and that excessive temperature was already the source of
numerous ignored complaints. MacDonald's had had fair warning, even if
that temperature may have been to the taste of some like you.


--
++====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====+====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====++
||Arnold VICTOR, New York City, i. e., <arvimideQ(a)Wearthlink.net> ||
||Arnoldo VIKTORO, Nov-jorkurbo, t. e., <arvimideQ(a)Wearthlink.net> ||
||Remove capital letters from e-mail address for correct address/ ||
|| Forigu majusklajn literojn el e-poŝta adreso por ĝusta adreso ||
++====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====+====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====++
From: D.F. Manno on
In article <doraymeRidThis-40CDAB.12015419112009(a)news.albasani.net>,
dorayme <doraymeRidThis(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote:

> AV3 <arvimide(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > Coffee is supposed to be sold at a drinkable temperature
>
> You just make things up as they suit you. It is not *supposed* to be
> this at all for reasons I have given.

So if you come into my establishment for a cup of coffee and I sell you
coffee at 212 degrees, that's OK? After all, coffee is not *supposed* to
be sold at a drinkable temperature.

--
D.F. Manno | dfmanno(a)mail.com
"I don't trust organized anything: teams, religions, corporations. People
in enterprise together consistently do two things: promulgate the enterprise,
no matter what, and protect miscreants in their midst." (Alfred Lubrano, author)
From: Wes Groleau on
D.F. Manno wrote:
> Well, how about this: she suffered third-degree burns and required skin
> grafts.

Does it actually say that in the transcripts?

In every medical or first aid class or book I've seen,
part of the definition of "third degree burn" includes
charred flesh. Coffee is mostly water, thus if not under
pressure, CANNOT be higher than 100 degrees Celsius, and
cannot char flesh.

(However, second degree burns can be caused by coffee at
sixty degrees Celsius, and if extensive, might require
skin grafts.)

--
Wes Groleau

Pat's Polemics
http://Ideas.Lang-Learn.us/barrett
From: Nick Naym on
In article doraymeRidThis-1921F3.07282319112009(a)news.albasani.net, dorayme
at doraymeRidThis(a)optusnet.com.au wrote on 11/18/09 3:28 PM:

> In article <C7299F71.4BBB0%nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com>,
> Nick Naym <nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In article doraymeRidThis-54FE62.13022317112009(a)news.albasani.net, dorayme
>> at doraymeRidThis(a)optusnet.com.au wrote on 11/16/09 9:02 PM:
>>
>>> In article <C727662E.4BAA3%nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com>,
>>> Nick Naym <nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gimmee a break.
>>>
>>> Granted by all the authority of dorayme.
>>
>>
>> Boy, don't I feel better. ;P
>
> That does not mean you are free to go forth among the sheep and
> multiply.

Not to worry: I wouldn't even think of raiding your harem.

> Take up some useful study.

If I did that, I wouldn't have time to humor you.

--
iMac (24", 2.8 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2GB RAM, 320 GB HDD) � OS X (10.5.8)

From: Nick Naym on
In article doraymeRidThis-C3288B.07351719112009(a)news.albasani.net, dorayme
at doraymeRidThis(a)optusnet.com.au wrote on 11/18/09 3:35 PM:

> In article <C729A256.4BBB3%nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com>,
> Nick Naym <nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In article 171120090213489304%nospam(a)nospam.invalid, nospam at
>> nospam(a)nospam.invalid wrote on 11/17/09 5:13 AM:
>>
> ...
>
>>> it's not a matter of correct or incorrect. the coffee was 20 degrees
>>> hotter than other restaurants. that is *not* an interpretation but a
>>> verifiable fact that anyone with a thermometer can determine.
>>>
>>
>> I guess that means that Henkels -- because its knives are well-known to be
>> sharper than those of most other manufacturers of kitchen cutlery -- would
>> be responsible for me injuring myself because I didn't use one of its
>> kitchen knives properly.
>
> Good case.
>
> (I see you have recovered a little brain power.

Whatever I recovered far exceeds what little you ever had.

> Must be hard keeping
> away from those sheep.

I told you not to worry.


> But well done!)

Glad you can rest easy.

--
iMac (24", 2.8 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2GB RAM, 320 GB HDD) � OS X (10.5.8)

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Prev: spam
Next: "Canceled opening the page" (Safari)