From: hutch-- on 10 Sep 2007 05:16 Betov, > As you seem unable to understand anything in Assembly What assembler, RotAsm is trying to be a compiler but doing it really badly. MASM is an assembler and it does the bulk of the high level stuff with its pre-processor, not compiler code like you have tried to write into RotAsm. > Plus, you can Double-Click upon, say, "MessageBox", select > [Unfold], and see the outputed pure Assembly, in the Click > time. So you need your compiler to see the code so its not assembler at all. > MessageBox &NULL, 'Hold on', 'Hutch--, --, --', &MB_OK > ExitProcess Wow you have hit the big time :) jmp lbl1 lbl0: fn MessageBox,0,"Stop deluding yourself Betov","Liar",MB_OK lbl1: .if rv(MessageBox,0,"Is Betov Past It ?","Question",MB_YESNO) == IDNO jmp lbl0 .else fn MessageBox,0,"Poor Old Fella","Yerp",MB_OK .endif exit > That being said, we are still waiting for you to post any Code > of yours, so that the Challenge could exist, and so that Half > could eventually eat his hat. Same place it was posted before Wannabee made his challenge, www.masm32.com
From: hutch-- on 10 Sep 2007 05:22 smile, > > The posted linkwww.masm32.com has over 100 complete short masm > > programs. > > Sorry, but this does not match with the challenge you have > accepted, on several points: Desperation again Betov. > * Nobody ever said that he would have to download an illegal > package. Is this based on your experience if stealing ASM32 ? When will you pay for it so RotAsm users can distribute their code safely ? > * The MASM examples are *NOT* from your hand. And RotAsm was written by the tooth fairy. How would you know, have you suddenly become an expert in MASM ? > Still waiting. While waiting help poor Wannabee chew his hat.
From: hutch-- on 10 Sep 2007 05:24 smile, > Give a try to a Power-Basic App: No use, it would be too powerful for you.
From: Betov on 10 Sep 2007 05:37 hutch-- <hutch(a)movsd.com> �crivait news:1189416270.361878.154180@ 22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com: > smile, > >> Give a try to a Power-Basic App: > > No use, it would be too powerful for you. You are right: Just post *complete* code of yours, that you would have written with your C-Side-Toy. Oooopppsss, in your case, it is a "PowerBasic-Side-Toy". :) Betov. < http://rosasm.org
From: hutch-- on 10 Sep 2007 06:43
smile, > You are right: Just post *complete* code of yours, that > you would have written with your C-Side-Toy. Oooopppsss, > in your case, it is a "PowerBasic-Side-Toy". You better try and stick to MASM code, at least you would have some chance to read it where PowerBASIC is just too powerful for you. |