From: CodeMonk on 10 Sep 2007 13:43 //\\o//\\annabee wrote: > > Cant you read? > > " This installation requires the Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition to be > installed on the computer." > Yes, I told Rene yesterday (i think) that I finally got the C-Side-Toy joke. I understand that getting MASM isn't the issue. I'm actually pondering a reply to your other post. For now, must eat Waffles :) - Scott
From: Frank Kotler on 10 Sep 2007 17:04 //\\o//\\annabee wrote: .... > Complete here means that they are ONE file each! Absurd, Wannabee! This is like Hutch demanding that your RosAsm equivalents be "modular". Won't fly. Best, Frank
From: //o//annabee on 10 Sep 2007 18:08 P� Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:04:56 +0100, skrev Frank Kotler <fbkotler(a)verizon.net>: > //\\o//\\annabee wrote: > > ... >> Complete here means that they are ONE file each! > > Absurd, Wannabee! This is like Hutch demanding that your RosAsm > equivalents be "modular". Won't fly. What are you saying? Are MASM _forcing_! you to divide your source??? I dont belive this can be correct. > Best, > Frank > >
From: //o//annabee on 10 Sep 2007 19:20 P� Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:04:56 +0100, skrev Frank Kotler <fbkotler(a)verizon.net>: > //\\o//\\annabee wrote: > > ... >> Complete here means that they are ONE file each! > > Absurd, Wannabee! This is like Hutch demanding that your RosAsm > equivalents be "modular". Won't fly. In case you probably missed it Frank. I _do_ modular with RosAsm. Every day. > Best, > Frank > >
From: hutch-- on 10 Sep 2007 18:34
smile, > No sorry, RosAsm does not eat hats. It only can do coffea and pizzas. Thats very clever Betov, such AI from an author like you but why is it so poor at writing assembler ? |