HAY Herbert, wanna write a legal PE executable ?
in [ASM]
|
From: Betov on 10 Sep 2007 12:19 hutch-- <hutch(a)movsd.com> �crivait news:1189434092.180475.32990 @k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com: > This is the challenge I accepted. > >=========================================== > 7 Feb 2005 06:09:17 -0800 > > Come up with 10-20 diffrent examples of _complete_ (short) MASM > programs, and I will write the RosAsm equivalents Yes? Then, why do you refuse to post the very first "example of _complete_ (short) MASM program", so that Half could begin heating his hat? Betov. < http://rosasm.org >
From: Betov on 10 Sep 2007 12:44 CodeMonk <jascwa(a)yahoo.com> �crivait news:k2eFi.39511$wN3.37046(a)bignews2.bellsouth.net: > Betov wrote: >> >> 1) He is right with being affraid of downloading illegal stuff. >> > > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=7A1C9DA0-0510- > 44A2-B042-7EF370530C64&displaylang=en > > Ok, I'm fairly certain there wouldn't be any issues of legality there. This is not the topic. Learn how to read, Scott. Betov. < http://rosasm.org >
From: Betov on 10 Sep 2007 12:47 CodeMonk <jascwa(a)yahoo.com> �crivait news:W7eFi.39515$wN3.1986 @bignews2.bellsouth.net: > OK, so your issue is with the MASM32 package specifically. The MASM package is not part of the challenge that Hutch-- has taken and now refuses to assume. > Which, as > far as I can tell, are full of his and many other talented developer's > sources. As you like, but this is not the topic. > Is it that you dispute they exist? No. Betov. < http://rosasm.org >
From: CodeMonk on 10 Sep 2007 12:50 Betov wrote: > >> Betov wrote: >>> 1) He is right with being affraid of downloading illegal stuff. >>> >> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=7A1C9DA0-0510- >> 44A2-B042-7EF370530C64&displaylang=en >> >> Ok, I'm fairly certain there wouldn't be any issues of legality there. > > This is not the topic. Learn how to read, Scott. > I'm trying Rene, but my EULA-FU is clouded, no wait, that's my bifocals :) - Scott
From: Betov on 10 Sep 2007 12:52
"Ratch" <watchit(a)comcast.net> �crivait news:xPKdnbPMStzV9HjbnZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d(a)comcast.com: > What is everyone squawking about? You can download MASM "legally" > from MS. And then? Does it make MicroSoft property Public Domain? > They are giving it away. No Thanks. This is not the topic. > Then download just the code Hutch > wrote from his site. Impossible: This is illegal. Also, this it not the topic, and not the challenge that his has taken, and refuses to assume. > Then have at it. At what? Where is Hutch-written *complete* Assembly first Source, that he is suyppose to show, *here*? Betov. < http://rosasm.org > |