Prev: Perfectly safe science-fiction, earth heated from outside in?
Next: A repulsive Fifth Interaction regulates the Universe
From: Arindam Banerjee on 10 Apr 2010 10:41
On Apr 10, 1:28 am, Zinnic <zeenr...(a)gate.net> wrote:
> On Apr 9, 7:55 am, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...(a)bigpond.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 9, 8:00 pm, Romanise <josh...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 9, 6:24 am, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...(a)bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> > > > W  I have written on
> > > > many important matters,
>
> > > Would you care to enumerate them?
>
> > Weren't you following my talks with Zinnic on various matters in
> > physics very closely?  Now, more and more people are agreeing with me,
> > and they are all out to throw out the wrong ideas of einstein's
> > special relativity, following my new findings and analysis.  The
> > important thing to do now, IS TO CHANGE ALL THE TEXT BOOKS ON PHYSICS
> > WHICH STILL TEACH THESE WRONG THEORIES.  Only then will this subject
> > regain its vitality, and be the source of a superior technology.
>
> > Cheers,
> > Arindam Banerjee
>
> Arindam, you have severally cited your discussion with me as if I
> supported your views on special relativity and your "internal energy
> engine".

All I got from you was an admission that there is an extra factor d
involved because of the Earth's movement.

> Let me be clear- I do not! Your fundamental mistake in the latter is
> essentially to claim that (V' -V") ^2 is the same as V'^2 - V"^2 in
> the equation of  Energy(kinetic) = 0.5 m V^2 as applied for
> calculating the difference in kinetic energy of a mass at V' and V".

That was not the point of discussion to begin with. We were talking
about the Doppler effect.

> You  failed to respond to this  objection

Irrelevant. This is a matter to be settled by experiment, and this
has been my stand for the last 10 years.

and also failed to concede
> the issue re the non-ballistic nature of the speed of sound in its
> carrier medium.  Your esoteric imagery of masses of piano/organ
> players dispersed by a volcano eruption as a fitting analogy for the
> speed of sound of thunder following a lightning stroke, convinced me
> that either you were not being serious or that a sensible discussion
> was no longer possible.


I too believe that any discussion between us is no longer possible, as
I too do not care for your attitude.

> Again, please desist from implying that I support your unsubstantiated
> claims.

I do not think I gave any impression of that sort. I was merely
referring to the enormous amount of matter I wrote, in response to
your observations. In due course, I believe that genuine scientists
will take note of my work and give me the due credit. What people
like you think, is irrelevant to me, and please be assured that I will
not bother you any more, nor refer to you in any manner again.

Arindam Banerjee

> Regards
>  Zinnic
From: Arindam Banerjee on 10 Apr 2010 10:50
On Apr 10, 2:13 am, Romanise <josh...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 9, 4:28 pm, Zinnic <zeenr...(a)gate.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 9, 7:55 am, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...(a)bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 9, 8:00 pm, Romanise <josh...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 9, 6:24 am, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...(a)bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > W  I have written on
> > > > > many important matters,
>
> > > > Would you care to enumerate them?
>
> > > Weren't you following my talks with Zinnic on various matters in
> > > physics very closely?  Now, more and more people are agreeing with me,
> > > and they are all out to throw out the wrong ideas of einstein's
> > > special relativity, following my new findings and analysis.  The
> > > important thing to do now, IS TO CHANGE ALL THE TEXT BOOKS ON PHYSICS
> > > WHICH STILL TEACH THESE WRONG THEORIES.  Only then will this subject
> > > regain its vitality, and be the source of a superior technology.
>
> > > Cheers,
> > > Arindam Banerjee
>
> > Arindam, you have severally cited your discussion with me as if I
> > supported your views on special relativity and your "internal energy
> > engine".
> > Let me be clear- I do not! Your fundamental mistake in the latter is
> > essentially to claim that (V' -V") ^2 is the same as V'^2 - V"^2 in
> > the equation of  Energy(kinetic) = 0.5 m V^2 as applied for
> > calculating the difference in kinetic energy of a mass at V' and V".
>
> > You  failed to respond to this  objection and also failed to concede
> > the issue re the non-ballistic nature of the speed of sound in its
> > carrier medium.  Your esoteric imagery of masses of piano/organ
> > players dispersed by a volcano eruption as a fitting analogy for the
> > speed of sound of thunder following a lightning stroke, convinced me
> > that either you were not being serious or that a sensible discussion
> > was no longer possible.
> > Again, please desist from implying that I support your unsubstantiated
> > claims.
> > Regards
> >  Zinnic
>
> Now our delusional Indian will say it was Peter Webb who in thanking
> heavens for the git to have taken Avtar in this Universe has accepted
> what the git has been claiming to us Indians for past ten years here
> on Usenet.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

All that is clear is that there is no lack of treacherous and
backstabbing, mean-minded and evil Indians around.
From: Arindam Banerjee on 11 Apr 2010 06:27
On Apr 10, 10:15 pm, Inverse 19 mathematics <hope9...(a)verizon.net>
wrote:
> On Apr 7, 8:05 am, Romanise <josh...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 7, 1:10 pm, Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1...(a)gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > To get the award, you got to get it in person, and for that you have
> > > to stay in Ashoka hotel.  So you got to pay them some thousand dollars
> > > US for the privilege.  In advance.  Plus your own air fare, and the
> > > time you spent there for which you do not make earnings.  If you don't
> > > pay in advance for the hospitality, you do not get the award.
>
> > Did you tell your employers about you being nominated for Bharat
> > Rattan and the expenses involved.
>
> > I am sure they would have felt honoured to meet most of the expenses
> > and give you on-duty leave.
>
> > Did you not know then the Australian Mining Pioneer Sir Jean-Paul
> > Turcaud,the prospector Mr Malcolm Fabian or the famous  Scientist
> > Straydoggie ? I am sure any of them would have felt honoured by their
> > friend and the only true genius after Newton and Maxwell, your good
> > self. Even Peter Webb would have felt honoured by you becoming Bharat
> > Rattan.
>
>  OH WHAT IS ALL THIS REALLY???

It is about a few things, from my side:
1. Einstein's theories of relativity are based upon a bungle, and that
this bungle is exposed from deductive logic
2. A new mathematical formula I discovered that relates mass and
energy on a non-destructive basis
3. With experimental validity for 2, the possibility of creating a new
kind of engine that will open up space travel to the stars in due
course
4. the maths for 2 indicates throwing out the concept of entropy and
making the law of conservation of energy a special case
5. my proposal, the futuristic Hydrogen Transmission Network, which is
the most efficient transport mechanism for energy and will give pure
hot water as a bonus
If you google groups with my name and these words, you should get
enough hits.

> About India  !!,

Actually all the above work was done in Australia, not India. In
India I did pioneering work on the field of partial-match retrievals,
the basis of modern search engines. Also, I developed microwave
antennas, and as a result I lost regard for the quantum theory.

> the land of many
> mystics and imaginations, magicians of the occult

Also snakes and snake-charmers, holy cows, etc. but my formal
education was purely western and included engineering and computer
science from the two most highly rated engineering institutions of
India - IIT Kharagpur and IIT Delhi. Plus I was educated in school by
the Jesuits, played as a child with Communists, walked the woods and
swum the rivers with the local aboriginals, learnt family values from
both nuclear and extended families, went on pilgrimages with highly
spiritual people, saw Hindi and Bengali and English and Russian
cinemas and theatres, heard Sanskrit chants in social and religious
ceremonies...

>, and Maharishes and

Well, yes, there are very wonderful people in India, highly advanced
in the spiritual domain, and I have had the good fortune of being
blessed by one of them (my guru) when I was a baby.

> millions of Professors of every discipline ,

True, but with advancing age the value I received from my beloved
teachers in school become much more with me - for the knowledge
remains, while the university education becomes dated and often wrong.

some of whom we have
> occasions to know and communicate with. Many Ramanujans Perhaps, a few
> Noble prize candidates in history---- BUT  what leads a vision to
> truth is a different matter

Indeed, how true. Without Divine Guidance, there can be no glimpse of
Truth, only projections of personal or group ego, desire, petulance,
whim, etc. that turn into unpleasant facts in due course, such as in
the Killing Fields of Cambodia.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee


- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

From: Romanise on 11 Apr 2010 10:27
On Apr 10, 3:50 pm, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...(a)bigpond.com> wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2:13 am, Romanise <josh...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> > On Apr 9, 4:28 pm, Zinnic <zeenr...(a)gate.net> wrote:

> > > Arindam, you have severally cited your discussion with me as if I
> > > supported your views on special relativity and your "internal energy
> > > engine".
> > > Let me be clear- I do not! Your fundamental mistake in the latter is
> > > essentially to claim that (V' -V") ^2 is the same as V'^2 - V"^2 in
> > > the equation of  Energy(kinetic) = 0.5 m V^2 as applied for
> > > calculating the difference in kinetic energy of a mass at V' and V".
>
> > > You  failed to respond to this  objection and also failed to concede
> > > the issue re the non-ballistic nature of the speed of sound in its
> > > carrier medium.  Your esoteric imagery of masses of piano/organ
> > > players dispersed by a volcano eruption as a fitting analogy for the
> > > speed of sound of thunder following a lightning stroke, convinced me
> > > that either you were not being serious or that a sensible discussion
> > > was no longer possible.
> > > Again, please desist from implying that I support your unsubstantiated
> > > claims.
> > > Regards
> > >  Zinnic
>
> > Now our delusional Indian will say it was Peter Webb who in thanking
> > heavens for the git to have taken Avtar in this Universe has accepted
> > what the git has been claiming to us Indians for past ten years here
> > on Usenet.

> All that is clear is that there is no lack of treacherous and
> backstabbing, mean-minded and evil Indians around.

But there is only one claiming to be completing the trinity headed by
Newton, or is the claim to head the trinity with Newton and the other
guy being second and third?
From: Romanise on 12 Apr 2010 08:04
On Apr 11, 5:52 pm, "Myself,PresentContinuouslyTenseMallu"
<KalluMallu...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>There is not one scientific journal
> publication of yours in which you have clearly enunciated your
> 'deductive logic' and shown that your 'formula' matches experimental
> data to establish validity, and more importantly, re-interpreted old
> data to establish (internal) consistency of your 'new physics.'

> Nothing to cheer you on about, lad.
> VB

The guy did approach science Journals, but they made fun of him. He
did not think much of his professors guides at two IITs he boasts by.
Judging from recent threads he started and got thoroughly thrashed by
those who know better it is clear he never before even tried Usenet
except soc.culture.indian group from where it looks you forced him to
'publish' on sci.physics etc.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Prev: Perfectly safe science-fiction, earth heated from outside in?
Next: A repulsive Fifth Interaction regulates the Universe