Prev: Perfectly safe science-fiction, earth heated from outside in?
Next: A repulsive Fifth Interaction regulates the Universe
From: Arindam Banerjee on 13 Apr 2010 18:12
Then there are issues like racism and reverse-racism, intellectual snobbery,
the fear of looking like and feeling as complete nincompoops when exposed,
etc. The last one is the most valid, in this situation. The question is,
how long can this nonsense of theoretical physics last? How long till they
accept that:
c(v=V) = c(v=0) + V
as the whole of Nature supports the above formula, which has been proven to
be correct with deductive logic from the MMI experiment?
I am afraid that careerism and institutionalisation on the one hand, and
media with fiction on the other, has corrupted both the should-be scientific
minds and the popular mind. So nothng good can be expected from the
opportunists and the brainwashed, who form 100% of the empowered population.
Still, one must have faith in the young. The Harry Potter kids, that is. I
hope they at least do not get so corrupted.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
"Arindam Banerjee" <adda1234(a)bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:4V5xn.19151$pv.5148(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> There is a difference between dogma and science, but this is not something
> careerists want to understand.
>
> "spudnik" <Space998(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:b419dfe8-9b05-4106-948f-6fabdfb5c9e2(a)g30g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> just because the Einsteinmaniacs insist -- including
> herr doktor-professor E., when he was presented
> with an article at his office in Caltech -- that
> Michelson and Morley got "null reults," does not mean
> that hte principle of relativity is wrong,
> Galilean or "Einsteinian." the only criterium
> for a phenomenon that needs any thing faster
> than teh dystrubance called light, is "science fiction."
>
>> > Everyone but you takes that for granted. It is implicit in
>> > calculations using Galilieoan/Newtonian relative or vector velocities.
>> > i.e Total distance (D +or- d) is proportional to the relative
>> > velocity (V +or- v) or the vectorial velocity. .
>>
>> > Also everyone concedes that the MM experimental null result does not
>> > preclude that the speed of light is dependent on the speed of its
>> > emitting source but it does not disprove evidence that indicates
>> > otherwise.
>
> --Light: A History!
> http://21stcenturysciencetech.com
>


From: Arindam Banerjee on 13 Apr 2010 18:15
Oi Doggie, that arsehole has again piped in. Not that I read his posts, of
course. But this time I won't give him the . treatment as that confuses
you. Did you read the limericks I wrote about jBm? Scope for
commercialisation here, dear doggie. Like, every football stamped with jBm
has a premium price, and my partner in such an enterprise and I get a cut
from that. Won't that be nice?
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

"Arindam Banerjee" <adda1234(a)bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:d9793957-8f10-4609-a5c8-14abe6809897(a)u34g2000yqu.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 13, 8:46 pm, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...(a)mv.com> wrote:
> Empty post?

Actually, I was showing this as the way to reply to stupid pricks,
such as the kallu-mallu quotawallah, the one corrupt to the core, and
his guru Romanise, the rattiest rat of Gujerat. On the google or IE
you can see the links on the tree, but on some other news server you
may not get the links. Sorry if I have confused you. I usually hang
out at sci and alt.philosophy, rec.arts.books and
soc.culture.bengali.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee


From: Arindam Banerjee on 13 Apr 2010 23:18
On Apr 14, 1:06 pm, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...(a)mv.com> wrote:
> There are also books written which question Einstein and his theories.
> I don't particularly follow them, but I know that they exist, and I saw
> one once. It documented that a lot of what Einstein presented was
> published previously by many other researchers.
>
> ======================================

I am not attacking his character, I am dismissing the theories of
relativity attributed to him.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee.

From: Me, ...again! on 13 Apr 2010 23:29


On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> On Apr 14, 1:06 pm, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...(a)mv.com> wrote:
>> There are also books written which question Einstein and his theories.
>> I don't particularly follow them, but I know that they exist, and I saw
>> one once. It documented that a lot of what Einstein presented was
>> published previously by many other researchers.
>>
>> ======================================
>
> I am not attacking his character, I am dismissing the theories of
> relativity attributed to him.

I'm not attacking his character, either. But, the books do exist.

There was even a FAQ posted on news.answers every month years ago. Might
be on www.faq.org, or whatever, if you want to look it up.


> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee.
>
>
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Prev: Perfectly safe science-fiction, earth heated from outside in?
Next: A repulsive Fifth Interaction regulates the Universe