How to Answer the Census.
in [Physics]
|
From: knews4u2chew on 18 Apr 2010 12:16 On Apr 18, 8:42 am, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 18, 6:10 am, Jackney Sneeb <jackneysn...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 20, 7:38 am, hal wrote: > > > > >Right, because I'm not a socialist. > > > > So you don't drive on the government run road system then? > > > We pay for roads when we buy gasoline. > > Not nearly the full cost. Roads are heavily subsidized with general > tax revenues. > > > That would happen with or without "government." > > No it would not. Government is what has the roads built and > maintained. > > HTH. They don't need to know how many bathrooms in my house to tax for roads. They only need to count the cars sold and retired. The 2010 census is "Data Mining" pure and simple. "Enumerate" means count the people. It doesn't mean get their name, rank, and serial number....yet.
From: Remy McSwain on 20 Apr 2010 14:21 In news:b96eaf7c-e171-47b1-9b71-ee9964361c4e(a)b39g2000prd.googlegroups.com, knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 20, 4:37 am, "Remy McSwain" <Paradis70...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: >> Innews:a4128f98-ca77-4664-888a-cd2a9a63a3bd(a)w32g2000prc.googlegroups.com, >> >> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>> Name calling and "catagorizing" proves nothing. >>> If you are afraid to stand up for your privacy rights you are a >>> lazy >>> traitor to America. >> >> Ohhhhhh, the irony! Do you, or do you not accept the validity of >> the US Constitution? Why have you never answered that simple >> question? > > I answered the simple Constitutional "enumeration" question. Do you, or do you not accept the validity of the US Constitution? Either you do, or you do not. You know that plain, simple English of which you're so fond? Use it to answer this simple question. > How many people at the abode?, "two." > Now bug off. What's the matter? Simple questions got you stymied? Simple, plain question requires a simple, plain answer.
From: Michael Price on 20 Apr 2010 03:57 On Mar 21, 12:38 am, hal wrote: > On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:43:08 -0700 (PDT), knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com > wrote: > > >> Great advise to give anyone outside your district. > >> No point letting them get benefits and representation > >> that you could have for yourself. > > >> Sue... > > >>http://2010.census.gov/2010census/ > > >Right, because I'm not a socialist. > > So you don't drive on the government run road system then? So because he uses something he was forced to pay for at gunpoint he's a socialist? > And if your house is burning down you be sure to not call the socialist fire > department. Why because you think he should pay for your fire service and a private one for him just so he say he's not a socialist? > Or the police if someone breaks into your home. Make > sure your electricy doesn't come from any government owned dams for > power plants. I'd be glad to make sure of that. By all means sell of the government electricity providers and privatise the cops. Then people like you can stop complaining that I use services you forced me to pay for.
From: Remy McSwain on 19 Apr 2010 08:26 In news:f4d86c5d-33d9-48bc-b571-c07d6802e182(a)e7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com, Jackney Sneeb <jackneysneeb(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I buy my electricity from the power company. And the only reason the sell it to you is because they know that there's a government administered infrastructure that allows them to collect the money that you would owe them if you fail to live up to your agreement with them.
From: Remy McSwain on 19 Apr 2010 08:38
In news:f4d86c5d-33d9-48bc-b571-c07d6802e182(a)e7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com, Jackney Sneeb <jackneysneeb(a)gmail.com> wrote: > We pay for roads when we buy gasoline. That would happen with or > without "government." And there are people who use roads who > don't buy gasoline, yet they are not prohibited from doing so. Yes, the government collects taxes when you buy gasoline, and then contracts to build roads. Your point? > a) the fire departments are both tax-funded, and volunteer. > There's no reason they couldn't all be volunteer, Of course there is. That's why growing communities shift from all volunteer to paid. Larger communities simply cannot get enough volunteers. >or even be > finance by insurance companies. This brings us to b) if your > house is burning down, you're going to want to call the > insurance company anyway. If the fire department doesn't put > the fire out in time you will need a whole new house. I would > rather have a new house than a half burnt/ half new one. Ridiculousness noted. > The police have no obligation to protect you from burglars (or > anyone else); the courts have ruled that way so you can't sue > them for non- protection. Also, 911 is not the "Bad Guy > Disable" code; if you're being burglarized, a gun is a far more > effective deterrent than a telephone. The police are more likely > to rob you than any other random burglar (at least, in America). > They get paid every month with tax money. More ridiculousness noted. > I buy my electricity from the power company. Which they would not sell to you if there were no way to compel you to pay if you took there electricity, and then refused to pay for it. > Where they get it > is none of my business. Head in the sand noted. > Without an overbearing socialist > bureaucracy, the power company would continue to find ways to > provide electricity - ways that would likewise be none of my > business. Head in deeper sand noted. |