Prev: C64 spotto
Next: A beter C compiler, anyone?
From: christianlott1 on 21 Jan 2010 22:22 On Jan 21, 5:39 am, my_nick_h...(a)hotmail.com wrote: > I'm in the planning stages for a new C= O/S. Here are some features , > goals, my reasoning, etc. (in scrambled order) ... What algorithm do you plan to use for memory management?
From: AgentFriday on 21 Jan 2010 22:26 Robert! Good to hear from you. I was at CommVex 2009, the guy that helped you guys load up the gear. Oh, and the one that mentioned something about doing an O/S. :p Catch you around.. //Steve
From: Michael J. Kerpan on 21 Jan 2010 23:51 At 21 Jan 2010 03:39:12 -0800 my_nick_here(a)hotmail.com wrote: > I'm in the planning stages for a new C= O/S. Here are some features , > goals, my reasoning, etc. (in scrambled order) ... Oh well, it seems like it should be interesting if ever finished. Complex OSes are certainly possible on 8 bit systems, as Symbos for Z80 and OS9 for 6809 prove, but I'm not really sure if anyone has ever done something on the scale you propose on th 6502 (which is a much simpler chip than either the 6809 or the Z80) Hope to hear about your progress, though. Mike
From: RobertB on 23 Jan 2010 02:25 On Jan 21, 7:26 pm, AgentFriday wrote: > Robert! Good to hear from you. Hey, Steve! I didn't know you frequented this place. :) > I was at CommVex 2009, the guy that > helped you guys load up the gear. You can come and help us again at this year's CommVEx v6 on July 24-25 in Las Vegas. :) > Oh, and the one that mentioned > something about doing an O/S. Maybe we should have a presentation on WiNGs in honor of your interest) we had a Wheels presentation at CommVEx v4). Truly, Robert Bernardo CommVEx v6 2010 - http://www.commodore.ca/forum and click on ComVEX
From: Glenn Holmer on 23 Jan 2010 18:36
AgentFriday wrote: > I've been meaning to check out Lunix, thanks for the nudge. And for > your thoughts. +1 re. LUnix |