Prev: Ever had to judge a new to-be-hired in interview ? REPOST
Next: Multiple Combo Boxes Highlighted - Solved
From: Karl E. Peterson on 18 Feb 2010 16:06 Paul Clement wrote: > Karl E. Peterson <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote: > � Yes, that's what I'm saying. Thanks for the amplification. Hopefully, > � one of these days you *will* offer evidence of your intellectual > � honesty. Presumably, you only act like this online, because it would > � sure make life a living he11 offline. > > Well you've met me off line so you should know, but that's beside the point. Right. Anakin seemed like an exceptionally nice little kid, too. ;-) > We may disagree with one another but that doesn't infer intellectual > dishonesty on either part, however; if you are going to infer that on my > part, the burden is not upon me to disprove a statement that you are > unwilling to substantiate. > > There is no intellectual honesty in attacking someone and calling them names > in a failed attempt to marginalize them. It simply means that you don't have > anything relevant to contribute. Whatever. I leave it to the peanut gallery to be my judge/jury. -- ..NET: It's About Trust! http://vfred.mvps.org
From: Karl E. Peterson on 18 Feb 2010 16:18 Paul Clement wrote: > Karl E. Peterson <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote: > � Yes, that's what I'm saying. Thanks for the amplification. Hopefully, > � one of these days you *will* offer evidence of your intellectual > � honesty. Presumably, you only act like this online, because it would > � sure make life a living he11 offline. > > Well you've met me off line so you should know, but that's beside the point. Right. Anakin seemed like an exceptionally nice little kid, too. ;-) > We may disagree with one another but that doesn't infer intellectual > dishonesty on either part, however; if you are going to infer that on my > part, the burden is not upon me to disprove a statement that you are > unwilling to substantiate. > > There is no intellectual honesty in attacking someone and calling them names > in a failed attempt to marginalize them. It simply means that you don't have > anything relevant to contribute. Whatever. I leave it to the peanut gallery to be my judge/jury. -- ..NET: It's About Trust! http://vfred.mvps.org
From: Tony Toews [MVP] on 18 Feb 2010 16:39 "sloan" <sloan(a)ipass.net> wrote: >HOWEVER, I have found benefit from making a "clean break", and instead of >accidentally bringing any bad vb6 practices with you, going to C# is my >suggestion. My understanding is that there are fundamental differences between VB6 and VB.Net such as the definitions of int and long. Thus things can really cause you problems. >Good luck. It's 2010. It's time to move forward. Not if it's a .Net product. My app depends on drag and drop deployment with no install. .Net solutions don't allow for that. Tony -- Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP Tony's Main MS Access pages - http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm Tony's Microsoft Access Blog - http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/ For a convenient utility to keep your users FEs and other files updated see http://www.autofeupdater.com/ Granite Fleet Manager http://www.granitefleet.com/
From: Paul Clement on 19 Feb 2010 08:25 On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:39:24 -0700, "Tony Toews [MVP]" <ttoews(a)telusplanet.net> wrote: � >Good luck. It's 2010. It's time to move forward. � � Not if it's a .Net product. My app depends on drag and drop � deployment with no install. .Net solutions don't allow for that. � � Tony That might be true for XP systems if the .NET Framework is not installed but it isn't true of Vista and Windows 7 where it comes pre-installed. Otherwise, for XP it's a one-time deployment. Paul ~~~~ Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
From: Mike Williams on 19 Feb 2010 10:06
"Paul Clement" <UseAdddressAtEndofMessage(a)swspectrum.com> wrote in message news:5v3tn5hsbjg2jtg1h2rjkkk4b7im7skvop(a)4ax.com... > � Not if it's a .Net product. My app depends on drag and drop > � deployment with no install. .Net solutions don't allow for that. > > for XP it's a one-time deployment. Last time I checked, "one" was more than "none"! Mike |