From: Karl E. Peterson on
Paul Clement wrote:
> Karl E. Peterson <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote:
> � Yes, that's what I'm saying. Thanks for the amplification. Hopefully,
> � one of these days you *will* offer evidence of your intellectual
> � honesty. Presumably, you only act like this online, because it would
> � sure make life a living he11 offline.
>
> Well you've met me off line so you should know, but that's beside the point.

Right. Anakin seemed like an exceptionally nice little kid, too. ;-)

> We may disagree with one another but that doesn't infer intellectual
> dishonesty on either part, however; if you are going to infer that on my
> part, the burden is not upon me to disprove a statement that you are
> unwilling to substantiate.
>
> There is no intellectual honesty in attacking someone and calling them names
> in a failed attempt to marginalize them. It simply means that you don't have
> anything relevant to contribute.

Whatever. I leave it to the peanut gallery to be my judge/jury.

--
..NET: It's About Trust!
http://vfred.mvps.org


From: Karl E. Peterson on
Paul Clement wrote:
> Karl E. Peterson <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote:
> � Yes, that's what I'm saying. Thanks for the amplification. Hopefully,
> � one of these days you *will* offer evidence of your intellectual
> � honesty. Presumably, you only act like this online, because it would
> � sure make life a living he11 offline.
>
> Well you've met me off line so you should know, but that's beside the point.

Right. Anakin seemed like an exceptionally nice little kid, too. ;-)

> We may disagree with one another but that doesn't infer intellectual
> dishonesty on either part, however; if you are going to infer that on my
> part, the burden is not upon me to disprove a statement that you are
> unwilling to substantiate.
>
> There is no intellectual honesty in attacking someone and calling them names
> in a failed attempt to marginalize them. It simply means that you don't have
> anything relevant to contribute.

Whatever. I leave it to the peanut gallery to be my judge/jury.

--
..NET: It's About Trust!
http://vfred.mvps.org


From: Tony Toews [MVP] on
"sloan" <sloan(a)ipass.net> wrote:

>HOWEVER, I have found benefit from making a "clean break", and instead of
>accidentally bringing any bad vb6 practices with you, going to C# is my
>suggestion.

My understanding is that there are fundamental differences between VB6
and VB.Net such as the definitions of int and long. Thus things can
really cause you problems.

>Good luck. It's 2010. It's time to move forward.

Not if it's a .Net product. My app depends on drag and drop
deployment with no install. .Net solutions don't allow for that.

Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Tony's Main MS Access pages - http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
Tony's Microsoft Access Blog - http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/
For a convenient utility to keep your users FEs and other files
updated see http://www.autofeupdater.com/
Granite Fleet Manager http://www.granitefleet.com/
From: Paul Clement on
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:39:24 -0700, "Tony Toews [MVP]" <ttoews(a)telusplanet.net> wrote:

� >Good luck. It's 2010. It's time to move forward.

� Not if it's a .Net product. My app depends on drag and drop
� deployment with no install. .Net solutions don't allow for that.

� Tony

That might be true for XP systems if the .NET Framework is not installed but it isn't true of Vista
and Windows 7 where it comes pre-installed.

Otherwise, for XP it's a one-time deployment.


Paul
~~~~
Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
From: Mike Williams on
"Paul Clement" <UseAdddressAtEndofMessage(a)swspectrum.com> wrote in message
news:5v3tn5hsbjg2jtg1h2rjkkk4b7im7skvop(a)4ax.com...

> � Not if it's a .Net product. My app depends on drag and drop
> � deployment with no install. .Net solutions don't allow for that.
>
> for XP it's a one-time deployment.

Last time I checked, "one" was more than "none"!

Mike