From: Paul Clement on
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:47:36 -0000, "Mike Williams" <Mike(a)WhiskyAndCoke.com> wrote:


� > LOL! You guys are so predictable it's hilarious.

� . . . and you think you're not! Sheesh! In your case MVP stands for
� Micro$oft Valuable Puppet.

� Mike

Uh, sorry but I'm not chasing people around, monitoring their posts in order to make certain they
post content I like and then labeling them when they don't.

Not much of an intellectual discussion on your part, but I do appreciate the fact that you read my
posts. ;-)


Paul
~~~~
Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
From: Paul Clement on
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:41:40 -0500, "C. Kevin Provance" <*@*.*> wrote:

� | Since he's not been a regular for the last two years, I bet his intentions
� | were not what they (as usual) turned into.
� |
� | /Henning

� Maybe, maybe not. I don't know. Someone has to be a hardass to nip these
� things in the bud. This should effectively prevent a repeat.


Not your job and I'm not sure why you have to be repeatedly reminded of that.


Paul
~~~~
Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
From: Mike Williams on
"Paul Clement" <UseAdddressAtEndofMessage(a)swspectrum.com> wrote in message
news:8otnn5hqukrd60pp5d9hivjt1mbb71pp4u(a)4ax.com...

> Not much of an intellectual discussion on your part

Well there certainly isn't on yours.

> but I do appreciate the fact that you read my
> posts. ;-)

And I appreciate the fact that you read mine. You certainly are an obedient
little puppet. Hopefully some of what I and others say will filter back to
the people who are pulling your strings.

Mike



From: Mike Williams on
"Paul Clement" <UseAdddressAtEndofMessage(a)swspectrum.com> wrote in message
news:m8vnn5hsu5a1gmi4jpe6gg6u2u8j8o34vc(a)4ax.com...

> � Maybe, maybe not. I don't know. Someone has to
> � be a hardass to nip these things in the bud.
>
> Not your job and I'm not sure why you have
> to be repeatedly reminded of that.

It's not your job to tell him it's not his job.

Mike


From: Paul Clement on
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:55:13 -0000, "Mike Williams" <Mike(a)WhiskyAndCoke.com> wrote:


� > Not much of an intellectual discussion on your part

� Well there certainly isn't on yours.

� > but I do appreciate the fact that you read my
� > posts. ;-)

� And I appreciate the fact that you read mine. You certainly are an obedient
� little puppet. Hopefully some of what I and others say will filter back to
� the people who are pulling your strings.

� Mike

Sorry, no strings attached, so good luck with that. ;-)

Try spending more time on the topic than focusing on me (if you can).


Paul
~~~~
Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)