Prev: Ever had to judge a new to-be-hired in interview ? REPOST
Next: Multiple Combo Boxes Highlighted - Solved
From: Paul Clement on 17 Feb 2010 09:28 On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:47:36 -0000, "Mike Williams" <Mike(a)WhiskyAndCoke.com> wrote: � > LOL! You guys are so predictable it's hilarious. � � . . . and you think you're not! Sheesh! In your case MVP stands for � Micro$oft Valuable Puppet. � � Mike Uh, sorry but I'm not chasing people around, monitoring their posts in order to make certain they post content I like and then labeling them when they don't. Not much of an intellectual discussion on your part, but I do appreciate the fact that you read my posts. ;-) Paul ~~~~ Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
From: Paul Clement on 17 Feb 2010 09:29 On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:41:40 -0500, "C. Kevin Provance" <*@*.*> wrote: � | Since he's not been a regular for the last two years, I bet his intentions � | were not what they (as usual) turned into. � | � | /Henning � � Maybe, maybe not. I don't know. Someone has to be a hardass to nip these � things in the bud. This should effectively prevent a repeat. � Not your job and I'm not sure why you have to be repeatedly reminded of that. Paul ~~~~ Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
From: Mike Williams on 17 Feb 2010 09:55 "Paul Clement" <UseAdddressAtEndofMessage(a)swspectrum.com> wrote in message news:8otnn5hqukrd60pp5d9hivjt1mbb71pp4u(a)4ax.com... > Not much of an intellectual discussion on your part Well there certainly isn't on yours. > but I do appreciate the fact that you read my > posts. ;-) And I appreciate the fact that you read mine. You certainly are an obedient little puppet. Hopefully some of what I and others say will filter back to the people who are pulling your strings. Mike
From: Mike Williams on 17 Feb 2010 09:59 "Paul Clement" <UseAdddressAtEndofMessage(a)swspectrum.com> wrote in message news:m8vnn5hsu5a1gmi4jpe6gg6u2u8j8o34vc(a)4ax.com... > � Maybe, maybe not. I don't know. Someone has to > � be a hardass to nip these things in the bud. > > Not your job and I'm not sure why you have > to be repeatedly reminded of that. It's not your job to tell him it's not his job. Mike
From: Paul Clement on 17 Feb 2010 12:28
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:55:13 -0000, "Mike Williams" <Mike(a)WhiskyAndCoke.com> wrote: � � > Not much of an intellectual discussion on your part � � Well there certainly isn't on yours. � � > but I do appreciate the fact that you read my � > posts. ;-) � � And I appreciate the fact that you read mine. You certainly are an obedient � little puppet. Hopefully some of what I and others say will filter back to � the people who are pulling your strings. � � Mike Sorry, no strings attached, so good luck with that. ;-) Try spending more time on the topic than focusing on me (if you can). Paul ~~~~ Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic) |