If you had to move from VB6...
in [Visual Basic]
|
Prev: Ever had to judge a new to-be-hired in interview ? REPOST
Next: Multiple Combo Boxes Highlighted - Solved
From: Paul Clement on 18 Feb 2010 08:52 On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:58:03 -0800, Karl E. Peterson <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote: � Paul Clement wrote: � > Not much of an intellectual discussion on your part, � � Presumably an impossibility when dealing with people who refuse to � display intellectual honesty. What was that you said in a recent post? "A fact not in evidence." Certainly not provided. Paul ~~~~ Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
From: Paul Clement on 18 Feb 2010 09:38 On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:26:06 -0000, "Mike Williams" <Mike(a)WhiskyAndCoke.com> wrote: � > Reminding someone of a policy is not a job. � � Well it's not /your/ job Paul, that's for sure! Besides, you did not remind � someone of a policy. Stop making things up. You told someone it was not his � job to perform a certain specific task, and it is not your job to tell � people such things. None of us here have a"job" that other members of the � group have tasked them with performing and nobody suggested they had, until � you came along and suggested it yourself. You are a hypocrite Paul. If you � feel, as you obviously do, that you are yourself at liberty to post � admonishments then please refrain from berating others who you personally � feel have done the same. Stop being a hypocrite. Reminding someone that there is no self moderation is not self moderation. But if you believe what you say, which naturally means you know there is no self moderation, and claim it is what I am doing, then why are you doing it? Or are you a hypocrite by your own faulty reasoning? ;-) But just to remind you as well, it's not your job to tell me what my job is or isn't anyway. ;-) Paul ~~~~ Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
From: Paul Clement on 18 Feb 2010 09:50 On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:47:52 -0500, "C. Kevin Provance" <*@*.*> wrote: � | Not your job and I'm not sure why you have to be repeatedly reminded of � that. � � Yeah, it is. You going to stop me? Now why would I want to do that? The fact that your are adamant enough to continue is sufficient amusement for me. Otherwise, the self-moderation policy was simply informational. I'm not your keeper. Paul ~~~~ Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
From: Karl E. Peterson on 18 Feb 2010 13:09 Paul Clement wrote: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:58:03 -0800, Karl E. Peterson <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote: > > � Paul Clement wrote: > � > Not much of an intellectual discussion on your part, > � > � Presumably an impossibility when dealing with people who refuse to > � display intellectual honesty. > > What was that you said in a recent post? "A fact not in evidence." Yes, that's what I'm saying. Thanks for the amplification. Hopefully, one of these days you *will* offer evidence of your intellectual honesty. Presumably, you only act like this online, because it would sure make life a living he11 offline. -- ..NET: It's About Trust! http://vfred.mvps.org
From: Paul Clement on 18 Feb 2010 15:28
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:09:23 -0800, Karl E. Peterson <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote: � Paul Clement wrote: � > On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:58:03 -0800, Karl E. Peterson <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote: � > � > � Paul Clement wrote: � > � > Not much of an intellectual discussion on your part, � > � � > � Presumably an impossibility when dealing with people who refuse to � > � display intellectual honesty. � > � > What was that you said in a recent post? "A fact not in evidence." � � Yes, that's what I'm saying. Thanks for the amplification. Hopefully, � one of these days you *will* offer evidence of your intellectual � honesty. Presumably, you only act like this online, because it would � sure make life a living he11 offline. Well you've met me off line so you should know, but that's beside the point. We may disagree with one another but that doesn't infer intellectual dishonesty on either part, however; if you are going to infer that on my part, the burden is not upon me to disprove a statement that you are unwilling to substantiate. There is no intellectual honesty in attacking someone and calling them names in a failed attempt to marginalize them. It simply means that you don't have anything relevant to contribute. Paul ~~~~ Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic) |