Prev: Slackware compatible?
Next: VT6656 WLAN Card
From: notbob on 12 Sep 2009 15:47 On 2009-09-12, Peter Chant <REMpeteOVE(a)petezilla.co.uk> wrote: > That was the only file that extracted. I forget. I recall a couple others, but I'm a geezer. Surprisingly, whether there's been a install script or not, this simple manual install has worked for the last few yrs of linux flash upgrades. In mozzy based browsers, anyway. Hey ...if I know it, you know its REAL common knowledge. ;) nb
From: Peter Chant on 12 Sep 2009 19:02 goarilla wrote: > you install another browser and make it the default ? :D So I visit eveyones in turns houses and download another browser for them?! It's my site so I only get to influence the server end (picked a nice linux host). -- http://www.petezilla.co.uk
From: Peter Chant on 12 Sep 2009 19:03 notbob wrote: > I figured you did. :) > > That was for the previous poster. Ah, I was slightly confused, was kind of thinking you thought that...ZZ (hmm - I'll leave that ZZ just to let everyone know I use vi a lot) -- http://www.petezilla.co.uk
From: Peter Chant on 12 Sep 2009 19:05 notbob wrote: > On 2009-09-12, Peter Chant <REMpeteOVE(a)petezilla.co.uk> wrote: > >> That was the only file that extracted. > > I forget. I recall a couple others, but I'm a geezer. > > Surprisingly, whether there's been a install script or not, this > simple manual install has worked for the last few yrs of linux flash > upgrades. In mozzy based browsers, anyway. Hey ...if I know it, you > know its REAL common knowledge. ;) I was surprised, missing installer is a rather obvious mistake, from a large company for a rather high profile plug in. I can't imagine it is a fault with slackware's tar, otherwise we'd be in a hole world of hurt with tar. -- http://www.petezilla.co.uk
From: Grant on 13 Sep 2009 02:27
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 00:03:21 +0100, Peter Chant <REMpeteOVE(a)petezilla.co.uk> wrote: >notbob wrote: > > >> I figured you did. :) >> >> That was for the previous poster. > >Ah, I was slightly confused, was kind of thinking you thought that...ZZ > >(hmm - I'll leave that ZZ just to let everyone know I use vi a lot) Am I alone in using :wq instead? Grant. -- http://bugsplatter.id.au |