From: Murat D. Kadirov on
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 08:57:03PM +0200, enos76 wrote:
> If you are using Slackware 13 64bit, the 32bit version of the Adobe
> Flash installer may be hanging because it cannot find /usr/lib/mozilla .
> Symlinking /usr/lib64/mozilla to /usr/lib/mozilla would also not work,
> because Firefox 3.5 64bit AFAIK only accepts 64bit plugins.
>
> I downloaded Adobe Flash 10 alpha 64bit for Linux from
> http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html#capBottom
> then copied its content libflashplayer.so in /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/
> (copying it in ~/.mozilla/plugins/ should also work).

slackware64 contains flashplayer-plugin. See /extra.

--
Murat D. Kadirov
PGP fingerprint: 3081 EBFA 5CB9 BD24 4DB6 76EE 1B97 0A0E CEC0 6AA0
From: Eef Hartman on
Grant wrote:
> Am I alone in using :wq instead?

No, but you SHOULD be: :x is shorter and more reliable (it won't reset
the date-modified when there are no changes and thus make "make" go into
loops and incremental backups unnecessary re-backup the file).

PS: :x is the "ex-mode" equivalent of the vi(sual-mode) ZZ command.
--
Eef Hartman, Delft University of Technology, dept. SSC/ICT
From: Loki Harfagr on
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:19:15 +0200, Eef Hartman did cat :

> Grant wrote:
>> Am I alone in using :wq instead?
>
> No, but you SHOULD be: :x is shorter and more reliable (it won't reset
> the date-modified when there are no changes and thus make "make" go into
> loops and incremental backups unnecessary re-backup the file).
>
> PS: :x is the "ex-mode" equivalent of the vi(sual-mode) ZZ command.

right, I usually only use :w when I actually type :w!
rest of the time it goes ZZ or :x!
Though, I never really thought about the rationale, just
got used to it as an easy type (on azerty at least)
From: Eef Hartman on
Peter Chant wrote:
> I was surprised, missing installer is a rather obvious mistake, from a
large
> company for a rather high profile plug in. I can't imagine it is a fault
> with slackware's tar, otherwise we'd be in a hole world of hurt with tar.

Just extracting cq copy'ing a single plugin file into the right
directory isn't exactly rocket-science, and that is all the installer
did after they stopped shipping it with a .xpt file (THAT one had to go
to the "components" subdirectory and the list of plugins then had to be
updated).
--
Eef Hartman, Delft University of Technology, dept. SSC/ICT
From: Chick Tower on
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:27:57 +1000, Grant wrote:

> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 00:03:21 +0100, Peter Chant
> <REMpeteOVE(a)petezilla.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>Ah, I was slightly confused, was kind of thinking you thought that...ZZ
>>
>>(hmm - I'll leave that ZZ just to let everyone know I use vi a lot)
>
> Am I alone in using :wq instead?
>
> Grant.

Hardly.

--
Chick Tower

For e-mail: aols2 DOT sent DOT towerboy AT xoxy DOT net

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Prev: Slackware compatible?
Next: VT6656 WLAN Card