Is gravity running out of puff?
in [Logic]
|
From: the borg on 28 Nov 2009 06:47 "John Jones" <jonescardiff(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message news:heot7f$44a$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > Gravity is running out of puff. One day, unless its > continual accelerative force is replenished, gravity will > disappear. Proof: Latest evidence shows that the universe > is expanding faster and faster - gravity is disappearing. > > Next to disappear will be atoms and particles. Unless they > continually make their presence known through time, which > they cannot do if they never change, then they too will > disappear. Proof: That is the reason for the existence of > a probabilistic quantum world, because particles are > already unexpectedly vanishing. > > Next to disappear will be space. If all particles are > gone, and nothing changes in space, then because space > itself is unchanging, and because Time only registers what > is changing, then space will vanish. Proof: When there was > nothing changing in the universe (before the Big Bang) > then there was also no space. > > Next to disappear will be Time. With nothing left in the > universe except Time, then the start and end of Time will > be indistinguishable. Both will vanish into the other. > > Next to disappear will be nothing. When there is nothing > at all, then all we have left is grammar. Proof: we find > ourselves sitting down in front of the computer reading > this, just as we were meant to from the beginning, Alpha > and Omega. Amen. Oh yes indeed JJ. Indeed it was known that you would write this message billions and more years ago. From time eternal, this was your destiny. To one day summarize the REAL and TRUE state of things, as mouse mats fly out the window and kettles cease to boil and Earth becomes unstable, the Great Prophet from Wales has spoken. AMEN
From: Kevin B. Murphy on 28 Nov 2009 12:48 The universe is expanding because... the only other alternative is that the universe is contracting?!? The universe is expanding because... if it was expanding immediately after the big bang then why would anything change? If the universe is contracting then the big bang is a future event and not a past event. Get the picture? For some reason, I am strangely obsessed with understanding gravity myself... My conclusion is that while gravity pulls us towards the center of the earth, mathmatically speaking it either pulls left to right or right to left. -- Denial of Free Will makes the Knowledge of Order Absolute.
From: duke on 28 Nov 2009 13:08 On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:02:56 +0000, John Jones <jonescardiff(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >Gravity is running out of puff. One day, unless its continual >accelerative force is replenished, gravity will disappear. Proof: Latest >evidence shows that the universe is expanding faster and faster - >gravity is disappearing. Gravity is a function of distance between objects. It's not disappearing, but the attraction is getting weaker. And the very point you make precludes the big crunch, means our universe is the one and only creation by God. >Next to disappear will be atoms and particles. Unless they continually >make their presence known through time, which they cannot do if they >never change, then they too will disappear. Proof: That is the reason >for the existence of a probabilistic quantum world, because particles >are already unexpectedly vanishing. > >Next to disappear will be space. If all particles are gone, and nothing >changes in space, then because space itself is unchanging, and because >Time only registers what is changing, then space will vanish. Proof: >When there was nothing changing in the universe (before the Big Bang) >then there was also no space. > >Next to disappear will be Time. With nothing left in the universe except >Time, then the start and end of Time will be indistinguishable. Both >will vanish into the other. > >Next to disappear will be nothing. You and I won't be around. The Dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
From: John Jones on 28 Nov 2009 22:05 duke wrote: > On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:02:56 +0000, John Jones <jonescardiff(a)btinternet.com> >> >> Next to disappear will be nothing. > > You and I won't be around. There won't be any "not being around".
From: Rockinghorse Winner on 29 Nov 2009 00:36
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:02:56 +0000, John Jones <jonescardiff(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >Next to disappear will be nothing. If nothing disappears, that would leave...everything? -- Hug your sweetie today. *R* *H* |