Is gravity running out of puff?
in [Logic]
|
From: Yap on 2 Dec 2009 06:15 On Nov 28, 1:01 pm, "Mark Earnest" <gmearn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > "John Jones" <jonescard...(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message > > news:heot7f$44a$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > > > > > > Gravity is running out of puff. One day, unless its continual accelerative > > force is replenished, gravity will disappear. Proof: Latest evidence shows > > that the universe is expanding faster and faster - gravity is > > disappearing. > > > Next to disappear will be atoms and particles. Unless they continually > > make their presence known through time, which they cannot do if they never > > change, then they too will disappear. Proof: That is the reason for the > > existence of a probabilistic quantum world, because particles are already > > unexpectedly vanishing. > > > Next to disappear will be space. If all particles are gone, and nothing > > changes in space, then because space itself is unchanging, and because > > Time only registers what is changing, then space will vanish. Proof: When > > there was nothing changing in the universe (before the Big Bang) then > > there was also no space. > > > Next to disappear will be Time. With nothing left in the universe except > > Time, then the start and end of Time will be indistinguishable. Both will > > vanish into the other. > > > Next to disappear will be nothing. When there is nothing at all, then all > > we have left is grammar. Proof: we find ourselves sitting down in front of > > the computer reading this, just as we were meant to from the beginning, > > Alpha and Omega. Amen. > > Well, at least you had a punch line this time. > So you think the universe is running down like a wind up toy > would. What is to keep someone from winding it up again? I thought you know your own answer and his reply perfectly......ie, the pixie in the sky?
From: Yap on 2 Dec 2009 06:18 On Nov 29, 2:08 am, duke <duckgumb...(a)cox.net> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:02:56 +0000, John Jones <jonescard...(a)btinternet.com> > wrote: > > >Gravity is running out of puff. One day, unless its continual > >accelerative force is replenished, gravity will disappear. Proof: Latest > >evidence shows that the universe is expanding faster and faster - > >gravity is disappearing. > > Gravity is a function of distance between objects. It's not disappearing, but > the attraction is getting weaker. And the very point you make precludes the big > crunch, means our universe is the one and only creation by God. But you find no god acting to stop the expansion. It is imperative that you find there is only an imagination of ancient goat herders. > > > > > > >Next to disappear will be atoms and particles. Unless they continually > >make their presence known through time, which they cannot do if they > >never change, then they too will disappear. Proof: That is the reason > >for the existence of a probabilistic quantum world, because particles > >are already unexpectedly vanishing. > > >Next to disappear will be space. If all particles are gone, and nothing > >changes in space, then because space itself is unchanging, and because > >Time only registers what is changing, then space will vanish. Proof: > >When there was nothing changing in the universe (before the Big Bang) > >then there was also no space. > > >Next to disappear will be Time. With nothing left in the universe except > >Time, then the start and end of Time will be indistinguishable. Both > >will vanish into the other. > > >Next to disappear will be nothing. > > You and I won't be around. > > The Dukester, American-American > ***** > "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI > *****
From: Yap on 2 Dec 2009 06:20 On Nov 29, 11:05 am, John Jones <jonescard...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > duke wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:02:56 +0000, John Jones <jonescard...(a)btinternet..com> > > >> Next to disappear will be nothing. > > > You and I won't be around. > > There won't be any "not being around". Yes, there is no god to take care of you and duke.
From: Yap on 2 Dec 2009 06:22 On Nov 30, 7:35 am, duke <duckgumb...(a)cox.net> wrote: > On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:08:12 -0800 (PST), Jimbo <ckdbig...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >On Nov 28, 1:08 pm, duke <duckgumb...(a)cox.net> wrote: > >> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:02:56 +0000, John Jones <jonescard...(a)btinternet.com> > >> wrote: > > >> >Gravity is running out of puff. One day, unless its continual > >> >accelerative force is replenished, gravity will disappear. Proof: Latest > >> >evidence shows that the universe is expanding faster and faster - > >> >gravity is disappearing. > > >> Gravity is a function of distance between objects. It's not disappearing, but > >> the attraction is getting weaker. And the very point you make precludes the big > >> crunch, means our universe is the one and only creation by God. > >Poor idiotic duke, doesn't even recognize satire when it slaps him in > >his face. > > But, I got the response right. And you didn't even have a clue. You can't even figure out the ball and string thing, let alone the concepts of time, universe and expansion..... > > The Dukester, American-American > ***** > "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI > *****
From: Errol on 2 Dec 2009 08:57
On Dec 2, 1:20 pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 29, 11:05 am, John Jones <jonescard...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > > > duke wrote: > > > On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:02:56 +0000, John Jones <jonescard...(a)btinternet.com> > > > >> Next to disappear will be nothing. > > > > You and I won't be around. > > > There won't be any "not being around". > > Yes, there is no god to take care of you and duke. The only problem with including alt.atheism in the newsgroup list is that it attracts your inevitably banal comments which are about as wanted as genital herpes. I liken you to a new gang member eager to prove his worth but unaware of how to do so, so he attacks everything with the same lack of discrimination. |