Is gravity running out of puff?
in [Logic]
|
From: hypatiab7 on 2 Dec 2009 01:20 On Nov 27, 11:02 am, John Jones <jonescard...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > Gravity is running out of puff. One day, unless its continual > accelerative force is replenished, gravity will disappear. Proof: Latest > evidence shows that the universe is expanding faster and faster - > gravity is disappearing. > > Next to disappear will be atoms and particles. Unless they continually > make their presence known through time, which they cannot do if they > never change, then they too will disappear. Proof: That is the reason > for the existence of a probabilistic quantum world, because particles > are already unexpectedly vanishing. > > Next to disappear will be space. If all particles are gone, and nothing > changes in space, then because space itself is unchanging, and because > Time only registers what is changing, then space will vanish. Proof: > When there was nothing changing in the universe (before the Big Bang) > then there was also no space. > > Next to disappear will be Time. With nothing left in the universe except > Time, then the start and end of Time will be indistinguishable. Both > will vanish into the other. > > Next to disappear will be nothing. When there is nothing at all, then > all we have left is grammar. Proof: we find ourselves sitting down in > front of the computer reading this, just as we were meant to from the > beginning, Alpha and Omega. Amen. He read this once in a comic book.
From: hypatiab7 on 2 Dec 2009 01:23 On Nov 29, 1:02 am, Shrikeback <shrikeb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 27, 8:02 am, John Jones <jonescard...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Gravity is running out of puff. One day, unless its continual > > accelerative force is replenished, gravity will disappear. Proof: Latest > > evidence shows that the universe is expanding faster and faster - > > gravity is disappearing. > > > Next to disappear will be atoms and particles. Unless they continually > > make their presence known through time, which they cannot do if they > > never change, then they too will disappear. Proof: That is the reason > > for the existence of a probabilistic quantum world, because particles > > are already unexpectedly vanishing. > > > Next to disappear will be space. If all particles are gone, and nothing > > changes in space, then because space itself is unchanging, and because > > Time only registers what is changing, then space will vanish. Proof: > > When there was nothing changing in the universe (before the Big Bang) > > then there was also no space. > > > Next to disappear will be Time. With nothing left in the universe except > > Time, then the start and end of Time will be indistinguishable. Both > > will vanish into the other. > > > Next to disappear will be nothing. When there is nothing at all, then > > all we have left is grammar. Proof: we find ourselves sitting down in > > front of the computer reading this, just as we were meant to from the > > beginning, Alpha and Omega. Amen. > > I disagree. Grammar be the first thing to go. And Grampar?
From: Father Haskell on 2 Dec 2009 01:39 On Nov 30, 3:58 am, Errol <vs.er...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not sure if space ever actually existed. I think it was invented > by the International League of FNORD
From: Errol on 2 Dec 2009 01:56 On Dec 2, 8:39 am, Father Haskell <fatherhask...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Nov 30, 3:58 am, Errol <vs.er...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm not sure if space ever actually existed. I think it was invented > > by the International League of > > FNORD Aha! Are you from the Bavarian branch of the illuminati?
From: Yap on 2 Dec 2009 06:13
On Nov 28, 12:02 am, John Jones <jonescard...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > Gravity is running out of puff. One day, unless its continual > accelerative force is replenished, gravity will disappear. Proof: Latest > evidence shows that the universe is expanding faster and faster - > gravity is disappearing. > > Next to disappear will be atoms and particles. Unless they continually > make their presence known through time, which they cannot do if they > never change, then they too will disappear. Proof: That is the reason > for the existence of a probabilistic quantum world, because particles > are already unexpectedly vanishing. > > Next to disappear will be space. If all particles are gone, and nothing > changes in space, then because space itself is unchanging, and because > Time only registers what is changing, then space will vanish. Proof: > When there was nothing changing in the universe (before the Big Bang) > then there was also no space. > > Next to disappear will be Time. With nothing left in the universe except > Time, then the start and end of Time will be indistinguishable. Both > will vanish into the other. > > Next to disappear will be nothing. When there is nothing at all, then > all we have left is grammar. Proof: we find ourselves sitting down in > front of the computer reading this, just as we were meant to from the > beginning, Alpha and Omega. Amen. You worry too much that you will end up in the ward. We are living happily here, without the need for your amen and god. |