Is gravity running out of puff?
in [Logic]
|
From: Shrikeback on 29 Nov 2009 01:02 On Nov 27, 8:02 am, John Jones <jonescard...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > Gravity is running out of puff. One day, unless its continual > accelerative force is replenished, gravity will disappear. Proof: Latest > evidence shows that the universe is expanding faster and faster - > gravity is disappearing. > > Next to disappear will be atoms and particles. Unless they continually > make their presence known through time, which they cannot do if they > never change, then they too will disappear. Proof: That is the reason > for the existence of a probabilistic quantum world, because particles > are already unexpectedly vanishing. > > Next to disappear will be space. If all particles are gone, and nothing > changes in space, then because space itself is unchanging, and because > Time only registers what is changing, then space will vanish. Proof: > When there was nothing changing in the universe (before the Big Bang) > then there was also no space. > > Next to disappear will be Time. With nothing left in the universe except > Time, then the start and end of Time will be indistinguishable. Both > will vanish into the other. > > Next to disappear will be nothing. When there is nothing at all, then > all we have left is grammar. Proof: we find ourselves sitting down in > front of the computer reading this, just as we were meant to from the > beginning, Alpha and Omega. Amen. I disagree. Grammar be the first thing to go.
From: Jimbo on 29 Nov 2009 01:08 On Nov 28, 1:08 pm, duke <duckgumb...(a)cox.net> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:02:56 +0000, John Jones <jonescard...(a)btinternet.com> > wrote: > > >Gravity is running out of puff. One day, unless its continual > >accelerative force is replenished, gravity will disappear. Proof: Latest > >evidence shows that the universe is expanding faster and faster - > >gravity is disappearing. > > Gravity is a function of distance between objects. It's not disappearing, but > the attraction is getting weaker. And the very point you make precludes the big > crunch, means our universe is the one and only creation by God. > Poor idiotic duke, doesn't even recognize satire when it slaps him in his face.
From: duke on 29 Nov 2009 18:35 On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:08:12 -0800 (PST), Jimbo <ckdbigtoe(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Nov 28, 1:08�pm, duke <duckgumb...(a)cox.net> wrote: >> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:02:56 +0000, John Jones <jonescard...(a)btinternet.com> >> wrote: >> >> >Gravity is running out of puff. One day, unless its continual >> >accelerative force is replenished, gravity will disappear. Proof: Latest >> >evidence shows that the universe is expanding faster and faster - >> >gravity is disappearing. >> >> Gravity is a function of distance between objects. �It's not disappearing, but >> the attraction is getting weaker. �And the very point you make precludes the big >> crunch, means our universe is the one and only creation by God. >Poor idiotic duke, doesn't even recognize satire when it slaps him in >his face. But, I got the response right. And you didn't even have a clue. The Dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
From: Errol on 30 Nov 2009 03:58 On Nov 27, 6:02 pm, John Jones <jonescard...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > Gravity is running out of puff. One day, unless its continual > accelerative force is replenished, gravity will disappear. Proof: Latest > evidence shows that the universe is expanding faster and faster - > gravity is disappearing. > I think you're right. I did a bungee jump on the weekend and flapped my arms real hard. I was amazed to find myself floating 500 feet above a river. I was about to detach myself from the harness and fly back to the bridge when gravity kicked in again with an audible sigh before I plummeted down again. > Next to disappear will be atoms and particles. Unless they continually > make their presence known through time, which they cannot do if they > never change, then they too will disappear. Proof: That is the reason > for the existence of a probabilistic quantum world, because particles > are already unexpectedly vanishing. > I know! you're right again. Do you also find that the particles about to disappear seem to gravitate towards the few remaining hairs in your rapidly growing baldspot? > Next to disappear will be space. If all particles are gone, and nothing > changes in space, then because space itself is unchanging, and because > Time only registers what is changing, then space will vanish. Proof: > When there was nothing changing in the universe (before the Big Bang) > then there was also no space. > I'm not sure if space ever actually existed. I think it was invented by the International League of conspiring evil psychiatrists ILCEP) and financially backed up by the big pharmaceuticals. The members of ILCEP ruled for 20 years with an iron fist but were unhappy that their acronym was meaningless so they reformed as Psychiatrists Against Really Autistic Nuts On Ironic Drugs (PARANOID) They ruled for 5 years with a wooden foot and finally with a piece of string (apologies to Spike Milligan) > Next to disappear will be Time. With nothing left in the universe except > Time, then the start and end of Time will be indistinguishable. Both > will vanish into the other. > have to disagree on this. My Titanium diving watch is virtually indestructible (up to 200 metres) > Next to disappear will be nothing. When there is nothing at all, then > all we have left is grammar. Proof: we find ourselves sitting down in > front of the computer reading this, just as we were meant to from the > beginning, Alpha and Omega. Amen. its'''' trew det gram..ar dis(a)pee,,RING
From: Jimbo on 1 Dec 2009 10:46
On Nov 29, 6:35 pm, duke <duckgumb...(a)cox.net> wrote: > On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:08:12 -0800 (PST), Jimbo <ckdbig...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >On Nov 28, 1:08 pm, duke <duckgumb...(a)cox.net> wrote: > >> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:02:56 +0000, John Jones <jonescard...(a)btinternet.com> > >> wrote: > > >> >Gravity is running out of puff. One day, unless its continual > >> >accelerative force is replenished, gravity will disappear. Proof: Latest > >> >evidence shows that the universe is expanding faster and faster - > >> >gravity is disappearing. > > >> Gravity is a function of distance between objects. It's not disappearing, but > >> the attraction is getting weaker. And the very point you make precludes the big > >> crunch, means our universe is the one and only creation by God. > >Poor idiotic duke, doesn't even recognize satire when it slaps him in > >his face. > > But, I got the response right. But you lost the quiz. |