Is there a way to convert a .TIF file in VB6
in [Visual Basic]
|
From: Karl E. Peterson on 3 Mar 2010 14:54 Tony Girgenti wrote: > Hello Karl. > >> It does work with VB6. Somewhere there's a BAS module with all the< >> proper VB6 declares in it. I have it here, and would be happy to send < >> it to you, if you'd like to drop me an email.< > > If you are talking the 'mFreeImage.bas' file in the > '\FreeImage3131Win32.zip\FreeImage\Wrapper\VB6\mfreeimage\' folder, i already > have that and i added it to the project. I can't tell you for sure if that's the same one. Mine has 10099 lines in it, if that lends a clue. >> But the helpfile for the DLL is extremely thorough. < > > Are you talking about this file? FreeImage3131.pdf. Well, mine is FreeImage392.pdf, so we're off by versions here. Looks like yours (v3.13.1) is a bit newer than mine (v3.9.2). I just downloaded the latest, and am looking at it now. Ahhh, no! The BAS file that comes with that sucks. This is more like the one I have: http://files.codes-sources.com/fichier.aspx?id=38872&f=MFreeImage.bas Although that's revision 1.5, and mine is 1.7 (which I can't seem to figure out where I downloaded it from). Will keep looking around. > I also have that, but i don't see how that helps me understand how to use > FreeImage in my VB 6 application. > > I'm still unsure of what to do and how to fix the errors i am getting. Well, you need to start by fixing that declare, as Nobody suggested. But to really get on top of it, I'd suggest you get the module I'm referring to, either from me or the site I just pointed you to, because it fixes *all* the declares, and just generally makes them a lot friendlier overall. -- ..NET: It's About Trust! http://vfred.mvps.org
From: Karl E. Peterson on 3 Mar 2010 15:00 Paul Clement wrote: > � It's not been clear exactly who you've been trying to please, over the > � last few years, with your antics in this group. It's abundantly clear > � that it's not any of the actual participants. > > You mean the "peanut gallery"? No, I wasn't being dismissive as I referred to everyone who participates here, both the regulars and the drive-bys. > So few in that group, tolerance is minimal, so > pleasing them is futile. I simply try to help those with questions > and they don't seem to get upset if I mention .NET. No, what you do is try to confuse those with questions, as in this thread, by responding about a different product entirely. If you care to dispute that, I'm confident the evidence is quite clear, and the only proper response will be, "FU2!" -- ..NET: It's About Trust! http://vfred.mvps.org
From: Paul Clement on 3 Mar 2010 15:07 On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 17:29:26 -0000, "Mike Williams" <Mike(a)WhiskyAndCoke.com> wrote: � > It's just information Mike. No reason to fear it or be � > intolerant of it or those who deliver it. � � Stop making things up Paul. It's nothing to do with fearing information or � being intolerant of it. It is all to do with not asking for it and not � wanting to hear it. If I or anyone else wished to listen to your VB.Net � sales patter or hear your VB.Net solutions to programming problems then we � would be asking our questions on the VB.Net newsgroup. If you want to � provide Classic VB solutions to Classic VB questions then stick around, � otherwise go somewhere else where your VB.Net stuff will be appreciated and � where it belongs, which is the group that Micro$oft have specifically set up � for it. It is more than a year since you posted a message to the main � Micro$oft VB.Net group so on the assumption that you have forgotten where it � is I'll give you a reminder. You'll find it at microsoft � public.dotnet.languages.vb � � Mike � Not necessary Mike. I moved on to the MSDN .NET forums a couple of years ago. No Classic VB forums there (other than the VB 6.0/VB .NET interop forum I support) and that's why I still participate in this newsgroup. As evidenced from my posts I support both Classic and .NET Visual Basic, separately and together, and that won't change until the Classic questions have dried up or until they shut down the NNTP newsgroup. Paul ~~~~ Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
From: Paul Clement on 3 Mar 2010 16:25 On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:00:11 -0800, Karl E. Peterson <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote: � Paul Clement wrote: � > � It's not been clear exactly who you've been trying to please, over the � > � last few years, with your antics in this group. It's abundantly clear � > � that it's not any of the actual participants. � > � > You mean the "peanut gallery"? � � No, I wasn't being dismissive as I referred to everyone who � participates here, both the regulars and the drive-bys. I must have missed the poll that was taken. � > So few in that group, tolerance is minimal, so � > pleasing them is futile. I simply try to help those with questions � > and they don't seem to get upset if I mention .NET. � � No, what you do is try to confuse those with questions, as in this � thread, by responding about a different product entirely. Yeah, I noticed the Windows API suggestions aren't exactly going very well for the OP. Seems the COM solution made the most sense to him since he was easily able to implement it. Go figure. Must be that confusing open sores library that someone suggested. � If you care to dispute that, I'm confident the evidence is quite clear, � and the only proper response will be, "FU2!" LOL! Well I'm sure the fact that *you* made that statement means that it's automatically self evident and now the burden of proof is upon me to refute it. Sometimes you're a riot (if not right) Karl! ;-) Paul ~~~~ Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
From: Karl E. Peterson on 3 Mar 2010 16:39
Paul Clement wrote: > I must have missed the ball. Yep. FU2, btw. -- ..NET: It's About Trust! http://vfred.mvps.org |