JSH: Depressing reality, prime reality
in [Math]
|
Prev: Dissection puzzle
Next: PRIME NUMBER DIVISOR , CLEAR EXPLANATION , BY INVERSE 19 ( AT THE REQUEST OF PROFESSOR ESCULTURA PHD)
From: Jim Ferry on 10 Mar 2010 16:59 On Mar 10, 12:29 pm, "harry" <nos...(a)invalid.com> wrote: > "JSH" <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:c9df7007-edde-4b12-bb32-96e5f6591ae1(a)t17g2000prg.googlegroups.com... > > >Try clipping your "Musatov" search in similar ways and see what you > >get. > > >James Harris > > Musatov another troll. Or is JSH = Musatov ? > > No one cares abou trolls. Trolls die horrible deaths. No, JSH is not Musatov. JSH's output is sophisticated enough that one is not surprised to learn he has a college degree in physics. Musatov's output is such that one is surprised he can manage the task of posting to Usenet. JSH surpasses Musatov the way a caribou surpasses a flea. It is clear that Musatov is incapable of producing anything as coherent as Musatov's Axiom #19: a careful search of the historical record will show that this is, in fact, the work of JSH, and was only attributed to Musatov through a historical accident of misattribution. Why this happened in unclear, but it may be because James is both so prolific and so unconcerned with fame.
From: spudnik on 10 Mar 2010 17:01 don't top-post, you God-am terra-ist! > yep, JSH is pure Troll.- Hide quoted text - --les OEuvres! http://wlym.com
From: Michael Stemper on 10 Mar 2010 17:31 In article <hn4dsl$dpp$2(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Rotwang <sg552(a)hotmail.co.uk> writes: >JSH wrote: >> On Mar 8, 6:56 pm, Rotwang <sg...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >>> Jesse F. Hughes wrote: >>>> If you'd simply look at the link, you'd know. >>> Indeed, but since James is concerned that looking at a .png file will >>> give him a virus: I used Google. >>> >>>>> And try Yahoo! or Bing as well. >>>> Searching for "Musatov's Axiom 19" brings up Jim's post on every site >>>> but Bing. So much the worse for Bing, since Jim's post is the most >>>> relevant mention of "Musatov's Axiom 19". >>> Actually, Jim's post was the second hit on Bing when I tried. It was the >>> first hit on Yahoo!. >His try was "Musatov's Axiom 19". What do you imagine the results of a >completely different search are supposed to prove? I have heard that Musatov's 19th Axiom, which deals with prime residues, could be of use in proving the Riemann Hypothesis. Does anybody hear have any opinion on whether the behavior of prime residues postulated by the 19th Axiom of Musatov would really relate to the Reimann Hypothesis? I personally don't see any connection between the Reimann Hypothesis and a prime residue (had to sneak a singular one in somehow), but I'll admit to having never given Prime Residue Theory much study. It would be interesting to see how the Prime Residue Behavior/Behaviour that is postulated by Musatov's 19th Axiom could help find zeroes of the Zeta Function. Anybody here remember the episode of _The Prisoner_ entitled "It's Your Funeral"? It didn't discuss the 19th Axiom of Musatov, nor was there ever any discussion of a Prime Residue favoring one answer over another. It did posultate the existence of "jammers", though. Musatov. 19th Axiom. Prime Residue. Fnord. -- Michael F. Stemper #include <Standard_Disclaimer>
From: harry on 10 Mar 2010 19:17 Nice site lyndon laroush and science "spudnik" <Space998(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:87ddc32f-07d2-40f8-aa85-88633572cb52(a)p3g2000pra.googlegroups.com... > don't top-post, you God-am terra-ist! > >> yep, JSH is pure Troll.- Hide quoted text - > > --les OEuvres! > http://wlym.com
From: harry on 10 Mar 2010 19:25
"Jim Ferry" <corklebath(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:04d5153d-40ee-4737-bda0-fad1d944e45d(a)d2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... On Mar 10, 12:29 pm, "harry" <nos...(a)invalid.com> wrote: > "JSH" <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:c9df7007-edde-4b12-bb32-96e5f6591ae1(a)t17g2000prg.googlegroups.com... > >> >Try clipping your "Musatov" search in similar ways and see what you >> >get. >> >> >James Harris >> >> Musatov another troll. Or is JSH = Musatov ? >> >> No one cares abou trolls. Trolls die horrible deaths. >No, JSH is not Musatov. JSH's output is sophisticated enough that one >is not surprised to learn he has a college degree in physics. >Musatov's output is such that one is surprised he can manage the task >of posting to Usenet. JSH surpasses Musatov the way a caribou >surpasses a flea. It is clear that Musatov is incapable of producing >anything as coherent as Musatov's Axiom #19: a careful search of the >historical record will show that this is, in fact, the work of JSH, >and was only attributed to Musatov through a historical accident of >misattribution. Why this happened in unclear, but it may be because >James is both so prolific and so unconcerned with fame. Agree, caribou and fleas is good. and Yes, Musatov is far more famous in higher circles, for far less compedient work than JSH. But we are comparing two Bozos in the Dark with squirt guns and weak minds. |