JSH: Depressing reality, prime reality
in [Math]
|
Prev: Dissection puzzle
Next: PRIME NUMBER DIVISOR , CLEAR EXPLANATION , BY INVERSE 19 ( AT THE REQUEST OF PROFESSOR ESCULTURA PHD)
From: Rotwang on 8 Mar 2010 20:34 JSH wrote: > On Mar 7, 6:54 pm, Jim Ferry <corkleb...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> On Mar 5, 9:08 pm, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> There is a lot of satisfaction with having my own axiom, which I had >>> the honor of naming as I'm the discoverer, which is of course, the >>> prime residue axiom, and yes, posters can reply in the negative or >>> derisively, but there you see the difference between finding something >>> and talk. >> Axiom 1: Axioms are never named by their formulators. >> Axiom 2: Axioms are never named after their formulators. >> >> Does this axiomatic system model the practice of mathematics >> accurately? Yes! I assert that it is so, willfully ignore any >> counterexamples, and denounce those who disagree with me as corrupt >> imbeciles. >> >> So now that that's settled, I hereby name the prime residue axiom, >> "Musatov's Axiom #19". And it's too early to say, but it could be >> Mustov's greatest legacy. > > You're deluded. Google your try, and then Google: prime residue axiom > > Or go to any web search engine. Here it does not have to be Google. http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/8200/axiom19.png The first hit is Jim's post on Google Groups. > The world listens to me. It does not listen to you. Looks like the world listens to Jim too. Unless, of course, Google is simply returning pages which contain the search string, irrespective of whether the world pays any attention to the contents of those pages. > Doubt me? Try the searches then. I say you're deluded but I wonder > if you'll acknowledge reality or continue to mouth off your defiance > against it. > > The latter is a little more interesting. Indeed.
From: JSH on 8 Mar 2010 20:49 On Mar 8, 5:34 pm, Rotwang <sg...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: > JSH wrote: > > On Mar 7, 6:54 pm, Jim Ferry <corkleb...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 5, 9:08 pm, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> There is a lot of satisfaction with having my own axiom, which I had > >>> the honor of naming as I'm the discoverer, which is of course, the > >>> prime residue axiom, and yes, posters can reply in the negative or > >>> derisively, but there you see the difference between finding something > >>> and talk. > >> Axiom 1: Axioms are never named by their formulators. > >> Axiom 2: Axioms are never named after their formulators. > > >> Does this axiomatic system model the practice of mathematics > >> accurately? Yes! I assert that it is so, willfully ignore any > >> counterexamples, and denounce those who disagree with me as corrupt > >> imbeciles. > > >> So now that that's settled, I hereby name the prime residue axiom, > >> "Musatov's Axiom #19". And it's too early to say, but it could be > >> Mustov's greatest legacy. > > > You're deluded. Google your try, and then Google: prime residue axiom > > > Or go to any web search engine. Here it does not have to be Google. > > http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/8200/axiom19.png I don't chase links. > The first hit is Jim's post on Google Groups. Not for me. Did you use Google or Google Groups? And try Yahoo! or Bing as well. > > The world listens to me. It does not listen to you. > > Looks like the world listens to Jim too. Unless, of course, Google is > simply returning pages which contain the search string, irrespective of > whether the world pays any attention to the contents of those pages. > > > Doubt me? Try the searches then. I say you're deluded but I wonder > > if you'll acknowledge reality or continue to mouth off your defiance > > against it. > > > The latter is a little more interesting. > > Indeed. I can't chase links as I'm not that trusting. But others may. I get my math when I check Google, Yahoo! and Bing, on the search: prime residue axiom I'm curious about what Jim Ferry claims. You should check multiple search engines as well. James Harris
From: junoexpress on 8 Mar 2010 21:05 On Mar 8, 8:49 pm, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > The world listens to me. It does not listen to you. > > James Harris There's a funny sketch about E.H. Hutton that comes to mind, but I digress.. However, maybe you can explain why is there not a single documented case on the entire internet of anybody using a single thing you've done? Maybe because it has no value (besides amusement)? HTH, M
From: Jesse F. Hughes on 8 Mar 2010 21:16 JSH <jstevh(a)gmail.com> writes: >> http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/8200/axiom19.png > > I don't chase links. > >> The first hit is Jim's post on Google Groups. > > Not for me. Did you use Google or Google Groups? If you'd simply look at the link, you'd know. > And try Yahoo! or Bing as well. Searching for "Musatov's Axiom 19" brings up Jim's post on every site but Bing. So much the worse for Bing, since Jim's post is the most relevant mention of "Musatov's Axiom 19". -- Jesse F. Hughes "Depression hits more people than thought." --headline in Lexington, KY newspaper, as reported on NPR's Morning Edition
From: Jesse F. Hughes on 8 Mar 2010 21:19
JSH <jstevh(a)gmail.com> writes: > I can't chase links as I'm not that trusting. What could go wrong? Obviously, I jest. The web is a dangerous place. For IE users, anyway. (For once, the following .sig was *not* randomly selected.) -- Jesse F. Hughes "Do not click any hyperlinks that you do not trust. Type them in the Address bar yourself." -- Microsoft gives security advice. |