JSH: Depressing reality, prime reality
in [Math]
|
Prev: Dissection puzzle
Next: PRIME NUMBER DIVISOR , CLEAR EXPLANATION , BY INVERSE 19 ( AT THE REQUEST OF PROFESSOR ESCULTURA PHD)
From: Rotwang on 8 Mar 2010 22:04 JSH wrote: > On Mar 8, 6:56 pm, Rotwang <sg...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >> Jesse F. Hughes wrote: >>> JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> writes: >>>>> http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/8200/axiom19.png >>>> I don't chase links. >>>>> The first hit is Jim's post on Google Groups. >>>> Not for me. Did you use Google or Google Groups? >>> If you'd simply look at the link, you'd know. >> Indeed, but since James is concerned that looking at a .png file will >> give him a virus: I used Google. >> >>>> And try Yahoo! or Bing as well. >>> Searching for "Musatov's Axiom 19" brings up Jim's post on every site >>> but Bing. So much the worse for Bing, since Jim's post is the most >>> relevant mention of "Musatov's Axiom 19". >> Actually, Jim's post was the second hit on Bing when I tried. It was the >> first hit on Yahoo!. > > Oh, search is: prime residue axiom > Or you can just try: residue axiom > Or you can try: prime residue Huh? You wrote You're deluded. Google your try, and then Google: prime residue axiom Or go to any web search engine. Here it does not have to be Google. The world listens to me. It does not listen to you. His try was "Musatov's Axiom 19". What do you imagine the results of a completely different search are supposed to prove?
From: Bacle on 8 Mar 2010 12:11 > On Mar 8, 6:05 pm, junoexpress > <mtbrenne...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mar 8, 8:49 pm, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > The world listens to me. It does not listen > to you. Really.?. The world laughs at you. > > > > > James Harris > > > > There's a funny sketch about E.H. Hutton that comes > to mind, but I > > digress.. > > It's called a reality check. Coming from someone like you, without a job, without any connectiont o the real world, that is ridiculous. People who learn modern > problem solving > SHOULD also learn about reality checks. Nobody wants to replicate the your methodology, because no one wants to fail indefinitely, like you have. > > In this case the reality check is a search in any web > search engine > on: prime residue axiom. You can bet no one will do it. Because you are not, in people's mind, a good example to follow. > > > However, maybe you can explain why is there not a > single documented > > case on the entire internet of anybody using a > single thing you've > > done? Maybe because it has no value (besides > amusement)? > > Hey, it's my math. Y ou can argue with me about > whether or not it's > important but it will still be my math. Nothing will > have changed. 40 more years of failure. Enjoy. > > > James Harris
From: JSH on 8 Mar 2010 22:20 On Mar 8, 7:04 pm, Rotwang <sg...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: > JSH wrote: > > On Mar 8, 6:56 pm, Rotwang <sg...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: > >> Jesse F. Hughes wrote: > >>> JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> writes: > >>>>>http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/8200/axiom19.png > >>>> I don't chase links. > >>>>> The first hit is Jim's post on Google Groups. > >>>> Not for me. Did you use Google or Google Groups? > >>> If you'd simply look at the link, you'd know. > >> Indeed, but since James is concerned that looking at a .png file will > >> give him a virus: I used Google. > > >>>> And try Yahoo! or Bing as well. > >>> Searching for "Musatov's Axiom 19" brings up Jim's post on every site > >>> but Bing. So much the worse for Bing, since Jim's post is the most > >>> relevant mention of "Musatov's Axiom 19". > >> Actually, Jim's post was the second hit on Bing when I tried. It was the > >> first hit on Yahoo!. > > > Oh, search is: prime residue axiom > > Or you can just try: residue axiom > > Or you can try: prime residue > > Huh? You wrote > > You're deluded. Google your try, and then Google: prime residue > axiom > > Or go to any web search engine. Here it does not have to be > Google. > > The world listens to me. It does not listen to you. > > His try was "Musatov's Axiom 19". What do you imagine the results of a > completely different search are supposed to prove? First, take off the quotes. And second, quit playing stupid. Now if I don't have quotes, why do you? Also, do that search on: prime residue Or search: residue axiom Yes, in MY THREAD, you may have a situation where putting quotes on that particular phrase is pulling into search engines now. But try the search again across search engines WITHOUT PUTTING IT IN QUOTES. Can you do that? James Harris
From: Rotwang on 8 Mar 2010 22:24 JSH wrote: > On Mar 8, 7:04 pm, Rotwang <sg...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >> JSH wrote: >>> On Mar 8, 6:56 pm, Rotwang <sg...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >>>> Jesse F. Hughes wrote: >>>>> JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> writes: >>>>>>> http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/8200/axiom19.png >>>>>> I don't chase links. >>>>>>> The first hit is Jim's post on Google Groups. >>>>>> Not for me. Did you use Google or Google Groups? >>>>> If you'd simply look at the link, you'd know. >>>> Indeed, but since James is concerned that looking at a .png file will >>>> give him a virus: I used Google. >>>>>> And try Yahoo! or Bing as well. >>>>> Searching for "Musatov's Axiom 19" brings up Jim's post on every site >>>>> but Bing. So much the worse for Bing, since Jim's post is the most >>>>> relevant mention of "Musatov's Axiom 19". >>>> Actually, Jim's post was the second hit on Bing when I tried. It was the >>>> first hit on Yahoo!. >>> Oh, search is: prime residue axiom >>> Or you can just try: residue axiom >>> Or you can try: prime residue >> Huh? You wrote >> >> You're deluded. Google your try, and then Google: prime residue >> axiom >> >> Or go to any web search engine. Here it does not have to be >> Google. >> >> The world listens to me. It does not listen to you. >> >> His try was "Musatov's Axiom 19". What do you imagine the results of a >> completely different search are supposed to prove? > > First, take off the quotes. > > And second, quit playing stupid. Now if I don't have quotes, why do > you? > > Also, do that search on: prime residue > > Or search: residue axiom > > Yes, in MY THREAD, you may have a situation where putting quotes on > that particular phrase is pulling into search engines now. But try > the search again across search engines WITHOUT PUTTING IT IN QUOTES. > > Can you do that? Already did, as you would know if you were to look at the image I posted (guess reality testing isn't much use if you're too scared to look at reality). All the searches whose results I reported were without quotes.
From: MichaelW on 8 Mar 2010 22:29
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:01:30 -0800, JSH wrote: > On Mar 8, 6:56 pm, Rotwang <sg...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >> Jesse F. Hughes wrote: >> > JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> writes: >> >> >>>http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/8200/axiom19.png >> >> I don't chase links. >> >> >>> The first hit is Jim's post on Google Groups. >> >> Not for me. Did you use Google or Google Groups? >> >> > If you'd simply look at the link, you'd know. >> >> Indeed, but since James is concerned that looking at a .png file will >> give him a virus: I used Google. >> >> >> And try Yahoo! or Bing as well. >> >> > Searching for "Musatov's Axiom 19" brings up Jim's post on every site >> > but Bing. So much the worse for Bing, since Jim's post is the most >> > relevant mention of "Musatov's Axiom 19". >> >> Actually, Jim's post was the second hit on Bing when I tried. It was >> the first hit on Yahoo!. > > Oh, search is: prime residue axiom > Or you can just try: residue axiom > Or you can try: prime residue > > > ___JSH If you invent an entirely new term for something that is commonly known by another name then of course you will hit the top of the search engine since no one else is calling it by the new term. Search on: Prime number theorem in arithmetic progressions and you will get the same result as known to mathematics for over 100 years. I get this as the top hit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Prime_number_theorem#The_prime_number_theorem_for_arithmetic_progressions which describes the history and provides a link to the proof. Regards, Michael W. |